Department of Sport, and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland.
Kinesiology Program, Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Metabolism. 2018 Apr;81:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
Low-carbohydrate diets have recently grown in popularity among endurance athletes, yet little is known about the long-term (>4wk) performance implications of consuming a low-carbohydrate high fat ketogenic diet (LCKD) in well-trained athletes.
Twenty male endurance-trained athletes (age 33±11y, body mass 80±11kg; BMI 24.7±3.1kg/m) who habitually consumed a carbohydrate-based diet, self-selected into a high-carbohydrate (HC) group (n=11, %carbohydrate:protein:fat=65:14:20), or a LCKD group (n=9, 6:17:77). Both groups performed the same training intervention (endurance, strength and high intensity interval training (HIIT)). Prior to and following successful completion of 12-weeks of diet and training, participants had their body composition assessed, and completed a 100km time trial (TT), six second (SS) sprint, and a critical power test (CPT). During post-intervention testing the HC group consumed 30-60g/h carbohydrate, whereas the LCKD group consumed water, and electrolytes.
The LCKD group experienced a significantly greater decrease in body mass (HC -0.8kg, LCKD -5.9kg; P=0.006, effect size (ES): 0.338) and percentage body fat percentage (HC -0.7%, LCKD -5.2%; P=0.008, ES: 0.346). Fasting serum beta-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) significantly increased from 0.1 at baseline to 0.5mmol/L in the LCKD group (P=0.011, ES: 0.403) in week 12. There was no significant change in performance of the 100km TT between groups (HC -1.13min·s, LCKD -4.07min·s, P=0.057, ES: 0.196). SS sprint peak power increased by 0.8 watts per kilogram bodyweight (w/kg) in the LCKD group, versus a -0.1w/kg reduction in the HC group (P=0.025, ES: 0.263). CPT peak power decreased by -0.7w/kg in the HC group, and increased by 1.4w/kg in the LCKD group (P=0.047, ES: 0.212). Fat oxidation in the LCKD group was significantly greater throughout the 100km TT.
Compared to a HC comparison group, a 12-week period of keto-adaptation and exercise training, enhanced body composition, fat oxidation during exercise, and specific measures of performance relevant to competitive endurance athletes.
低碳水化合物饮食最近在耐力运动员中越来越受欢迎,但对于经过训练的运动员来说,长期(>4 周)摄入低碳水化合物高脂肪生酮饮食(LCKD)对运动表现的影响知之甚少。
20 名有经验的耐力训练运动员(年龄 33±11 岁,体重 80±11kg;BMI 24.7±3.1kg/m),习惯性地食用基于碳水化合物的饮食,自行选择高碳水化合物(HC)组(n=11,碳水化合物:蛋白质:脂肪=65:14:20)或低碳水化合物高脂肪生酮饮食(LCKD)组(n=9,6:17:77)。两组均进行相同的训练干预(耐力、力量和高强度间歇训练(HIIT))。在成功完成 12 周的饮食和训练后,对参与者的身体成分进行评估,并完成 100km 计时赛(TT)、六秒(SS)冲刺和临界功率测试(CPT)。在干预后测试期间,HC 组每小时消耗 30-60g 碳水化合物,而 LCKD 组仅消耗水和电解质。
LCKD 组体重明显下降(HC -0.8kg,LCKD -5.9kg;P=0.006,效应量(ES):0.338),体脂百分比明显下降(HC -0.7%,LCKD -5.2%;P=0.008,ES:0.346)。LCKD 组空腹血清β-羟丁酸(βHB)从基线时的 0.1mmol/L 显著增加至 0.5mmol/L(P=0.011,ES:0.403)在第 12 周。两组 100km TT 之间的运动表现没有显著变化(HC -1.13min·s,LCKD -4.07min·s,P=0.057,ES:0.196)。SS 冲刺峰值功率增加了 0.8 瓦/千克体重(w/kg),而 HC 组则减少了 0.1w/kg(P=0.025,ES:0.263)。HC 组 CPT 峰值功率下降了-0.7w/kg,而 LCKD 组增加了 1.4w/kg(P=0.047,ES:0.212)。LCKD 组在整个 100km TT 期间的脂肪氧化明显增加。
与高碳水化合物对照组相比,12 周的酮适应和运动训练增强了身体成分、运动时的脂肪氧化以及与竞技耐力运动员相关的特定运动表现指标。