Strzyżewska-Worotyńska Emilia, Szarek Józef, Babińska Izabella, Gulda Dominika
Department of Pathophysiology, Forensic Veterinary Medicine and Administration, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego St. 13, 10-719, Olsztyn, Poland.
Department of Sheep, Goat and Fur Bearing Animal Breeding, University of Science and Technology, Mazowiecka St. 28, 85-084, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Environ Monit Assess. 2017 Nov 6;189(12):611. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6278-7.
We investigated environmental impacts on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared at fish farms with either extensive technology, in a flow-through system (FTS, n = 3), or intensive technology, in a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS, n = 3). All fish were fed the same rations. Fish were caught in spring and autumn (body mass, 501-750 g) from these six farms. We performed macroscopic (intact fish) and microscopic (gills stained with haematoxylin/eosin) examinations. Lesions were categorised based on the type and location of structural abnormalities. The histopathological index (HAI) was calculated, and each lesion was scored. Fish reared in FTS or RAS were compared for the prevalence of morphological lesions. Gill epithelial hypertrophy and hyperplasia comprised 73% (RAS) to 79% (FTS) of all morphological abnormalities. In spring and autumn, lesions comprised, respectively, 11 and 18% (FTS) and 16 and 10% (RAS) mucous and chloride cell abnormalities and 8 and 4% (FTS) and 10 and 3% (RAS) blood vessel abnormalities. Diffuse, irreversible gill lesions were observed sporadically in all fish. Gill epithelium received the most exposure to environmental pathogens. HAIs indicated that normal gill architecture and minor lesions predominated in all fish. However, among trout caught in spring, moderate and extensive changes in gills occurred more commonly with RAS (34%) than with FTS (17%). Trout caught in autumn displayed no great differences. These results indicated that FTS prepared fish better than RAS for wintering. Moreover, we showed that gills were an excellent biomarker for analysing the impact of extensive and intensive production environments on rainbow trout.
我们研究了环境对采用粗放技术(流水系统,FTS,n = 3)或集约技术(循环水养殖系统,RAS,n = 3)在养鱼场养殖的虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss)的影响。所有鱼投喂相同的定量饲料。在春季和秋季从这六个养殖场捕获鱼(体重501 - 750克)。我们进行了宏观(完整鱼体)和微观(鳃用苏木精/伊红染色)检查。根据结构异常的类型和位置对病变进行分类。计算组织病理学指数(HAI),并对每个病变进行评分。比较了在FTS或RAS中养殖的鱼形态学病变的发生率。鳃上皮肥大和增生占所有形态学异常的73%(RAS)至79%(FTS)。在春季和秋季,病变分别包括11%和18%(FTS)以及16%和10%(RAS)的黏液细胞和氯细胞异常,以及8%和4%(FTS)以及10%和3%(RAS)的血管异常。在所有鱼中偶尔观察到弥漫性、不可逆的鳃病变。鳃上皮最易接触环境病原体。HAIs表明所有鱼的鳃结构正常和轻微病变占主导。然而,在春季捕获的鳟鱼中,RAS(34%)比FTS(17%)更常出现鳃的中度和广泛变化。秋季捕获的鳟鱼没有显著差异。这些结果表明,FTS养殖的鱼比RAS养殖的鱼更适合越冬。此外,我们表明鳃是分析粗放和集约生产环境对虹鳟影响的优秀生物标志物。