• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国农业部 AgrAbility 项目有效性的定量评估。

A quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of USDA's AgrAbility project.

机构信息

Colorado State University, Human Development and Family Studies, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1570, United States.

Colorado State University, Department of Statistics, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1877, United States.

出版信息

Disabil Health J. 2018 Apr;11(2):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.10.004
PMID:29110968
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that the combination of assistive technology and education increases ability to live and work independently, which in turn increases the quality of life (QOL) levels of adults with disabilities. No previously published treatment-comparison group intervention studies were found with adult farmers and ranchers with disabilities. Knowing how effective USDA's AgrAbility Project is at increasing this population's QOL and independent living and working (ILW) levels will reinforce and inform change in AgrAbility and will provide outcomes for stakeholders and public decision makers to better address agricultural communities' needs.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether or not AgrAbility is effective for enhancing QOL and ILW levels of agricultural producers with functional limitations and to assess intervention-comparison group differences.

METHODS

Intervention group participants (N = 225) included ranchers and farmers from 12 states with various disabilities who participated in AgrAbility. Comparison group participants (N = 100) from 17 states also included farmers and ranchers with various disabilities; they received no on-site visits or other AgrAbility services.

RESULTS

In this 10-year, 27-state study, AgrAbility participants reported statistically significant presurvey-postsurvey improvements in QOL levels (mean presurvey = 5.56; mean postsurvey = 7.13) while comparison group participants reported no change in QOL (mean presurvey = 5.10; mean postsurvey = 4.91). AgrAbility group mean ILW scores rose from 2.86 to 3.71 while comparison group mean ILW scores rose slightly from 3.24 to 3.50.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that AgrAbility was effective as compared with a no-treatment comparison group on improving QOL and ILW levels.

摘要

背景

有证据表明,辅助技术与教育相结合可以提高独立生活和工作的能力,从而提高残疾成年人的生活质量(QOL)水平。目前尚未发现针对残疾成年农民和牧场主的治疗对照干预研究。了解美国农业部的 AgrAbility 项目在提高这一人群的 QOL 和独立生活和工作(ILW)水平方面的有效性,将加强并为 AgrAbility 提供信息,并为利益相关者和公共决策者提供结果,以更好地满足农业社区的需求。

目的

评估 AgrAbility 是否能有效提高有功能障碍的农业生产者的生活质量和独立生活和工作水平,并评估干预对照组的差异。

方法

干预组参与者(N=225)包括来自 12 个州的有各种残疾的牧场主和农民,他们参加了 AgrAbility。对照组参与者(N=100)来自 17 个州,也包括有各种残疾的农民和牧场主;他们没有接受现场访问或其他 AgrAbility 服务。

结果

在这项为期 10 年、涉及 27 个州的研究中,AgrAbility 参与者报告说,他们的生活质量水平在调查前和调查后有显著的提高(平均调查前为 5.56;平均调查后为 7.13),而对照组参与者的生活质量没有变化(平均调查前为 5.10;平均调查后为 4.91)。AgrAbility 组的平均 ILW 分数从 2.86 上升到 3.71,而对照组的平均 ILW 分数略有上升,从 3.24 上升到 3.50。

结论

这些结果表明,与无治疗对照组相比,AgrAbility 在提高生活质量和独立生活和工作水平方面是有效的。

相似文献

1
A quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of USDA's AgrAbility project.美国农业部 AgrAbility 项目有效性的定量评估。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Apr;11(2):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
2
Assessing changes in quality of life and independent living and working levels among AgrAbility farmers and ranchers with disabilities.评估残疾农民和牧场主的生活质量、独立生活和工作水平的变化。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Apr;11(2):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
3
Quality of life and independent living and working levels of farmers and ranchers with disabilities.残疾农民和牧场主的生活质量以及独立生活和工作水平。
Disabil Health J. 2016 Apr;9(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
4
Dissemination of assistive technology information to farmers and ranchers with disabilities.向残疾农民和牧场主传播辅助技术信息。
J Agric Saf Health. 2011 Jul;17(3):187-207. doi: 10.13031/2013.38182.
5
AgrAbility mental/behavioral health for farm/ranch families with disabilities.残障农牧场/牧场家庭的 AgrAbility 心理健康/行为健康项目。
J Agromedicine. 2011 Apr;16(2):87-98. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.554766.
6
A 25-Year Overview of AgrAbility Demographics.《AgrAbility 项目人口统计学 25 年概述》。
J Agromedicine. 2021 Oct;26(4):393-403. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2020.1837318. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
Underserved farmers with disabilities: designing an AgrAbility program to address health disparities.服务不足的残疾农民:设计 AgrAbility 项目以解决健康差距。
J Agromedicine. 2011 Apr;16(2):99-105. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2011.554767.
8
"Keep Me Doing What I Love": A Photovoice Evaluation of the Missouri AgrAbility Project.“让我继续做我热爱之事”:密苏里农业残障项目的摄影之声评估
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):425-431. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1356778.
9
National AgrAbility Project impact on farmers and ranchers with disabilities.国家农业残障人士项目对残疾农民和牧场主的影响。
J Agric Saf Health. 2006 Nov;12(4):275-91. doi: 10.13031/2013.22009.
10
Twenty years of AgrAbility: a retrospective forum.《AgrAbility 二十年:回顾论坛》。
J Agromedicine. 2012;17(4):410-4. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2012.713844.