Pol Arch Intern Med. 2018 Jan 31;128(1):15-23. doi: 10.20452/pamw.4141. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
INTRODUCTION A higher prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been noted among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly in those with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). Due to a similar clinical presentation and the lack of highly specific laboratory tests, there is a common overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). The introduction of an additional, simple, and inexpensive diagnostic tool to help in the diagnosis of PE in patients with AECOPD would be of special interest for everyday clinical practice. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of the monocyte to large platelet ratio (MLPR) as a diagnostic tool for PE in patients with AECOPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients with AECOPD and suspicion of PE who underwent CTPA. The MLPR was investigated as a marker of thrombosis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were preformed to measure the accuracy of the MLPR in comparison with CTPA results and to identify the cutoff value for the MLPR. RESULTS A total of 101 patients (56 men and 45 women; median age, 72 years; range, 37-94 years) were included in the study. The MLPR showed an excellent accuracy in comparison with CTPA results: the area under the ROC curve was 0.945 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.904-0.986). The MLPR was characterized by a good accuracy of qualitative test parameters, with high sensitivity (100%; 95% CI, 79.6-100) and specificity (85.7%; 95% CI, 75.9-92.6). CONCLUSIONS The MLPR measurement appears to be a reliable, simple, inexpensive, and widely available test that may help in the differential diagnosis of PE in patients with AECOPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺栓塞(PE)患病率较高,尤其是在 COPD 急性加重(AECOPD)患者中。由于临床表现相似,且缺乏高度特异性的实验室检查,CTPA 检查的过度使用较为常见。对于日常临床实践,引入一种额外的、简单且廉价的诊断工具来帮助诊断 AECOPD 患者中的 PE 将具有特殊意义。目的:本研究旨在评估单核细胞与大血小板比值(MLPR)作为 AECOPD 患者中 PE 诊断工具的有用性。患者与方法:我们对疑似患有 AECOPD 和 PE 并接受 CTPA 检查的患者进行了回顾性评估。将 MLPR 作为血栓形成的标志物进行研究。进行了接收者操作特性(ROC)曲线分析,以比较 MLPR 与 CTPA 结果的准确性,并确定 MLPR 的截断值。结果:共纳入 101 例患者(56 名男性和 45 名女性;中位年龄 72 岁;范围 37-94 岁)。与 CTPA 结果相比,MLPR 具有出色的准确性:ROC 曲线下面积为 0.945(95%置信区间 [CI],0.904-0.986)。MLPR 的定性测试参数具有良好的准确性,高灵敏度(100%;95%CI,79.6-100)和特异性(85.7%;95%CI,75.9-92.6)。结论:MLPR 测量似乎是一种可靠、简单、廉价且广泛可用的检测方法,可有助于对 AECOPD 患者中的 PE 进行鉴别诊断。