Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK;.
Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(11):2761-2767. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx406.
Combination pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel (D) is considered standard first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. This post hoc, exploratory analysis of CLEOPATRA study data evaluated the clinical effects of D treatment duration within this regimen. The clinical benefits of pertuzumab and trastuzumab by different durations of D treatment were also evaluated.
Patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer received trastuzumab and D plus pertuzumab or placebo. Clinical outcomes were analyzed by the number of D cycles that patients received (<6D, 6D, or >6D). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for each treatment arm within each D cycle group were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier approach. Time-dependent, multivariate Cox regression was applied to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HER2-targeted therapy and D cycle groups.
Overall, 804 patients received <6D (n = 119), 6D (n = 210), or >6D (n = 475) cycles. After adjusting for pertuzumab benefits versus placebo (PFS HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.74, P < 0.0001; OS HR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.49-0.74, P < 0.0001), >6D versus 6D cycles was not associated with statistically significant improvements in PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.01, P = 0.0640) or OS (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.69-1.12, P = 0.3073). Consistent improvements in PFS and OS were observed with pertuzumab versus placebo, irrespective of D duration. The HRs for PFS were 0.395, 0.615, and 0.633 for <6D, 6D, and >6D cycles, respectively (P < 0.05 for all D cycle groups). Corresponding HRs for OS were 0.577, 0.700, and 0.612, respectively (P < 0.05 for <6D and >6D).
After accounting for pertuzumab benefits, more than six cycles of D treatment was not associated with significant improvements in either PFS or OS compared with six cycles. The addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab improved clinical outcomes versus trastuzumab plus placebo, regardless of D treatment duration.
CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00567190.
曲妥珠单抗、帕妥珠单抗和多西他赛(D)联合治疗被认为是人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)阳性转移性乳腺癌的标准一线治疗方法。本 CLEOPATRA 研究数据的事后探索性分析评估了该方案中 D 治疗持续时间的临床效果。还评估了不同 D 治疗持续时间的曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗的临床获益。
HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌患者接受曲妥珠单抗和 D 加帕妥珠单抗或安慰剂治疗。根据患者接受的 D 周期数(<6D、6D 或>6D)分析临床结局。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计每个 D 周期组中每个治疗臂的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。应用时间依赖性多变量 Cox 回归估计 HER2 靶向治疗和 D 周期组的调整危险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
总体而言,804 名患者接受了<6D(n=119)、6D(n=210)或>6D(n=475)个周期。在调整了与安慰剂相比,曲妥珠单抗的获益(PFS HR=0.61,95%CI 0.51-0.74,P<0.0001;OS HR=0.60,95%CI,0.49-0.74,P<0.0001)后,与 6D 相比,>6D 周期与 PFS(HR=0.80,95%CI 0.63-1.01,P=0.0640)或 OS(HR=0.88,95%CI 0.69-1.12,P=0.3073)的统计学显著改善无关。无论 D 持续时间如何,与安慰剂相比,使用帕妥珠单抗均观察到 PFS 和 OS 的一致改善。PFS 的 HR 分别为<6D、6D 和>6D 周期的 0.395、0.615 和 0.633(所有 D 周期组的 P<0.05)。OS 的相应 HR 分别为 0.577、0.700 和 0.612(P<0.05,<6D 和>6D)。
在考虑到曲妥珠单抗的获益后,与 6 个周期相比,D 治疗超过 6 个周期与 PFS 或 OS 的显著改善无关。与曲妥珠单抗加安慰剂相比,曲妥珠单抗加帕妥珠单抗的加入改善了临床结局,无论 D 治疗持续时间如何。
临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT00567190。