Dong Yuhao, Zeng Miaoyu, Zhang Bin, Han Lujun, Liu Entao, Lian Zhouyang, Liu Jing, Liang Changhong, Zhang Shuixing
Department of Radiology, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences/Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, P.R. China.
Graduate College, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong 515041, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2017 Nov;14(5):6224-6230. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6962. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
The aim of the present study was to analyze the differences in imaging and clinical features between primary pulmonary lymphoma (PPL) and secondary pulmonary lymphoma (SPL) to provide insight into pulmonary lymphoma for an improved clinical diagnosis. A retrospective study of 38 patients with pulmonary lymphoma (19 PPL and 19 SPL) treated between September 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015, was performed. The clinical manifestations, and computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT images of each case were collected. χ and Fisher's exact tests were applied to assess statistically significant differences between PPL and SPL in terms of clinical and imaging features. The significant variables were further applied to canonical discriminate analysis. The CT results revealed that the occurrence of a >3-cm mass (P=0.007), peripheral location (lower than the segmental bronchi) (P=0.027), cavitation (P=0.008) and consolidation (P=0.027) were associated with PPL, while peripheral and hilar location (P=0.003) or mediastinal and hilar lymph node engagement (P=0.044) were predominantly observed in SPL. However, no significant differences between clinical manifestations and the maximum standard uptake value of pulmonary lesions in PPL and SPL were identified (all P>0.05). A function derived from discriminate analysis was generated that may predict the affiliation to PPL or SPL radiographically, with an overall accuracy of ≤92.1%. The results of the present study revealed that PPL and SPL exhibit distinctive features on CT images due to distinct molecular mechanisms and growth patterns. Careful observation of CT features may be useful in the diagnosis of PPL and SPL regarding the tumor morphology, location and lymph node involvement.
本研究的目的是分析原发性肺淋巴瘤(PPL)和继发性肺淋巴瘤(SPL)在影像学和临床特征上的差异,以便深入了解肺淋巴瘤,改善临床诊断。对2006年9月1日至2015年12月31日期间接受治疗的38例肺淋巴瘤患者(19例PPL和19例SPL)进行了回顾性研究。收集了每个病例的临床表现、计算机断层扫描(CT)和正电子发射断层扫描-CT图像。应用χ检验和Fisher精确检验评估PPL和SPL在临床和影像学特征方面的统计学显著差异。将显著变量进一步应用于典型判别分析。CT结果显示,直径>3 cm的肿块(P=0.007)、外周位置(低于段支气管)(P=0.027)、空洞形成(P=0.008)和实变(P=0.027)与PPL相关,而外周和肺门位置(P=0.003)或纵隔和肺门淋巴结受累(P=0.044)主要见于SPL。然而,PPL和SPL在临床表现和肺部病变最大标准摄取值方面未发现显著差异(所有P>0.05)。生成了一个来自判别分析的函数,该函数可在影像学上预测属于PPL或SPL,总体准确率≤92.1%。本研究结果显示,由于分子机制和生长模式不同,PPL和SPL在CT图像上表现出独特特征。仔细观察CT特征可能有助于在诊断PPL和SPL时了解肿瘤形态、位置和淋巴结受累情况。