Kelić Katarina, Matić Sanja, Marović Danijela, Klarić Eva, Tarle Zrinka
Private Dental Office, Croatia
Department of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Acta Clin Croat. 2016 Dec;55(4):607-614. doi: 10.20471/acc.2016.55.04.11.
The aim of the study was to determine microhardness of high- and low-viscosity bulk-fill composite resins and compare it with conventional composite materials. Four materials of high-viscosity were tested, including three bulk-fills: QuiXfi l (QF), x-tra fi l (XTF) and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TEBCF), while nanohybrid composite GrandioSO (GSO) served as control. The other four were low-viscosity composites, three bulk-fill materials: Smart Dentin Replacement (SDR), Venus Bulk Fill (VBF) and x-tra base (XB), and conventional control material X-Flow (XF). Composite samples (n=5) were polymerized for 20 s with Bluephase G2 curing unit. Vickers hardness was used to determine microhardness of each material at the surface, and at 2-mm and 4-mm depth. GSO on average recorded significantly higher microhardness values than bulk-fill materials (p<0.001). The low-viscosity composite XF revealed similar microhardness values as SDR, but significantly lower than XB (p<0.001) and significantly higher than VBF (p<0.001). Microhardness of high-viscosity bulk-fill materials was lower than microhardness of the conventional composite material (GSO). Surface microhardness of low-viscosity materials was generally even lower. The microhardness of all tested materials at 4 mm was not different from their surface values. However, additional capping layer was a necessity for low-viscosity bulk-fill materials due to their low microhardness.
本研究的目的是测定高粘度和低粘度大体积充填复合树脂的显微硬度,并将其与传统复合材料进行比较。测试了四种高粘度材料,包括三种大体积充填材料:QuiXfi l(QF)、x-tra fi l(XTF)和Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill(TEBCF),而纳米混合复合材料GrandioSO(GSO)作为对照。另外四种是低粘度复合材料,三种大体积充填材料:Smart Dentin Replacement(SDR)、Venus Bulk Fill(VBF)和x-tra base(XB),以及传统对照材料X-Flow(XF)。复合样本(n = 5)使用Bluephase G2固化单元聚合20秒。采用维氏硬度测定每种材料在表面、2毫米和4毫米深度处 的显微硬度。GSO平均记录的显微硬度值明显高于大体积充填材料(p<0.001)。低粘度复合材料XF显示出与SDR相似的显微硬度值,但明显低于XB(p<0.001)且明显高于VBF(p<0.001)。高粘度大体积充填材料的显微硬度低于传统复合材料(GSO)。低粘度材料的表面显微硬度通常更低。所有测试材料在4毫米处的显微硬度与其表面值无差异。然而,由于低粘度大体积充填材料的显微硬度较低,需要额外的覆盖层。