Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):88-95. doi: 10.2337/dc17-1074. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
To assess national differences in diabetes care and quality of life (QOL) between individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes (≥50 years) in Canada and the U.S.
Cross-sectional data from identical surveys administered in the Canadian Study of Longevity in Diabetes and the Joslin Medalist Study, collected in 2013-2016 and 2005-2011, respectively, were compared. Laboratory values and ophthalmic examination were completed by clinical care physicians for Canadians and the Joslin Clinic for Americans. Univariate comparisons and multivariable regression for HbA, QOL, insulin pump use, and coronary artery disease (CAD) were performed. Nephropathy, CAD, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were self-reported; neuropathy was defined by a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (Questionnaire component) score ≥3, and proliferative retinopathy was documented from ophthalmic examination. QOL was self-reported on an ordinal scale.
Three hundred sixty-one Canadians and 668 Americans had similar ages (mean 65.78 years [SD 8.67] vs. 66.38 years [7.66], = 0.27) and durations of diabetes (median 53.00 years [interquartile range 51.00, 58.00] vs. 53.00 years [51.00, 57.00], = 0.51). Canadians had higher HbA (mean 7.53% [SD 1.03] [59 mmol/mol] vs. 7.22% [0.98] [55 mmol/mol], < 0.0001), lower QOL (36.9% vs. 48.7% with "excellent" QOL, = 0.0002), and less CAD (29.7% vs. 41.2%, = 0.0003) and insulin pump use (43.3% vs. 55.6%, = 0.0002). Other complication rates were similar. Residual differences for Canadians compared with Americans remained after adjustment for age, sex, CAD, PAD, education, and relevant a priori selected variables: 0.28% higher HbA ( = 0.0004); and odds ratios of 0.68 (95% CI 0.51, 0.90), 0.46 (0.31, 0.68), and 0.71 (0.52, 0.96) for higher QOL, CAD, and insulin pump use, respectively.
Although Canadians and Americans have similar rates of complications other than CAD, further research is required to understand why Canadians have higher HbA levels, lower QOL, and less insulin pump use.
评估加拿大和美国长期(≥50 年)1 型糖尿病患者在糖尿病治疗和生活质量(QOL)方面的国家差异。
比较了 2013-2016 年和 2005-2011 年分别在加拿大长寿糖尿病研究和 Joslin 奖章研究中进行的相同调查的横断面数据。加拿大由临床医生完成实验室值和眼科检查,而美国由 Joslin 诊所完成。对 HbA、QOL、胰岛素泵使用和冠心病(CAD)进行了单变量比较和多变量回归。肾病、CAD 和外周动脉疾病(PAD)为自我报告;神经病通过密歇根神经病筛查工具(问卷部分)评分≥3 来定义,增殖性视网膜病变则通过眼科检查记录。QOL 为自我报告的等级量表。
361 名加拿大人和 668 名美国人年龄相近(平均年龄 65.78 岁[SD 8.67]与 66.38 岁[7.66], = 0.27),糖尿病病程也相似(中位数 53.00 岁[四分位距 51.00,58.00]与 53.00 岁[51.00,57.00], = 0.51)。加拿大人的 HbA 水平较高(平均 7.53%[SD 1.03] [59 mmol/mol]与 7.22%[0.98] [55 mmol/mol], < 0.0001),QOL 较低(36.9%与 48.7%的“优秀”QOL, = 0.0002),CAD(29.7%与 41.2%, = 0.0003)和胰岛素泵使用率(43.3%与 55.6%, = 0.0002)较低。其他并发症发生率相似。对加拿大人与美国人进行比较后,在调整年龄、性别、CAD、PAD、教育程度和相关预设变量后,仍存在与加拿大相关的差异:HbA 高 0.28%( = 0.0004);QOL 较高、CAD 和胰岛素泵使用率分别为 0.68(95%CI 0.51,0.90)、0.46(0.31,0.68)和 0.71(0.52,0.96)的比值。
尽管加拿大和美国除 CAD 以外的并发症发生率相似,但仍需要进一步研究以了解为什么加拿大人的 HbA 水平较高、QOL 较低且胰岛素泵使用率较低。