Chytas D, Korres D S, Babis G C, Efstathopoulos N E, Papadopoulos E C, Markatos K, Nikolaou V S
2nd Orthopaedic Department of University of Athens, Konstantopouleio Hospital, Nea Ionia, Greece.
, 75, Theotokopoulou Str, 11144, Athens, Greece.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):343-349. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2072-z. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
The thorough knowledge of C2 lamina anatomy is essential for the avoidance of complications during screw fixation. We performed a review of the literature, aiming to detect what was found about anatomical feasibility of C2 translaminar fixation in different populations, along with possible recommendations for the avoidance of complications, and to detect whether factors such as race or gender could influence axis lamina anatomy and fixation feasibility.
We performed a search in PubMed and Cochrane database of systematic reviews for studies which correlated axis lamina anatomy with fixation feasibility. We extracted data concerning measurements on C2 lamina, the methods and conclusions of the studies.
Twenty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies mainly focused on Asian populations. Male gender was generally related to larger anatomical parameters of C2 lamina. The use of a C2 translaminar screw with a diameter of 3.5 mm was generally feasible, even in children, but there was disagreement about risk of vertebral artery injury. Computed tomography was most frequently recommended preoperatively. Three-dimensional reconstruction was suggested by some authors.
C2 lamina anatomy generally permitted screw fixation in most studies, but there was disagreement about risk of vertebral artery injury. Preoperative computed tomography was generally recommended, while, according to some authors, three-dimensional reconstruction could be essential. However, there is a relative lack of studies about non-Asian populations. More research could further illustrate the anatomy of C2 lamina, clarify the safety of axis fixation for more populations and perhaps modify preoperative imaging protocols.
全面了解C2椎板解剖结构对于避免螺钉固定过程中的并发症至关重要。我们对文献进行了综述,旨在查明在不同人群中C2经椎板固定的解剖学可行性方面的研究发现、避免并发症的可能建议,并查明种族或性别等因素是否会影响枢椎椎板解剖结构和固定可行性。
我们在PubMed和Cochrane系统评价数据库中检索将枢椎椎板解剖结构与固定可行性相关联的研究。我们提取了有关C2椎板测量、研究方法和结论的数据。
26项研究符合我们的纳入标准。这些研究主要集中在亚洲人群。男性通常与C2椎板较大的解剖学参数相关。使用直径3.5毫米的C2经椎板螺钉通常是可行的,即使在儿童中也是如此,但对于椎动脉损伤风险存在分歧。术前最常推荐使用计算机断层扫描。一些作者建议进行三维重建。
在大多数研究中,C2椎板解剖结构通常允许进行螺钉固定,但对于椎动脉损伤风险存在分歧。通常推荐术前进行计算机断层扫描,而一些作者认为三维重建可能至关重要。然而,关于非亚洲人群的研究相对较少。更多研究可能会进一步阐明C2椎板的解剖结构,明确更多人群枢椎固定的安全性,并可能修改术前成像方案。