• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理实践和基本护理最小数据集的方法、指标和研究空白:范围文献综述。

Methods, metrics and research gaps around minimum data sets for nursing practice and fundamental care: A scoping literature review.

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2230-2247. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14155. Epub 2017 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.14155
PMID:29119641
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To examine and map research on minimum data sets linked to nursing practice and the fundamentals of care. Another aim was to identify gaps in the evidence to suggest future research questions to highlight the need for standardisation of terminology around nursing practice and fundamental care.

BACKGROUND

Addressing fundamental care has been highlighted internationally as a response to missed nursing care. Systematic performance measurements are needed to capture nursing practice outcomes.

DESIGN

Overview of the literature framed by the scoping study methodology.

METHOD

PubMed and CINAHL were searched using the following inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed empirical quantitative and qualitative studies related to minimum data sets and nursing practice published in English. No time restrictions were set. Exclusion criteria were as follows: no available full text, reviews and methodological and discursive studies. Data were categorised into one of the fundamentals of care elements.

RESULTS

The review included 20 studies published in 1999-2016. Settings were mainly nursing homes or hospitals. Of 14 elements of the fundamentals of care, 11 were identified as measures in the included studies, but their frequency varied. The most commonly identified elements concerned safety, prevention and medication (n = 11), comfort (n = 6) and eating and drinking (n = 5).

CONCLUSION

Studies have used minimum data sets and included variables linked to nursing practices and fundamentals of care. However, the relations of these variables to nursing practice were not always clearly described and the main purpose of the studies was seldom to measure the outcomes of nursing interventions. More robust studies focusing on nursing practice and patient outcomes are warranted.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Using minimum data sets can highlight the nurses' work and what impact it has on direct patient care. Appropriate models, systems and standardised terminology are needed to facilitate the documentation of nursing activities.

摘要

目的和目标

检查并绘制与护理实践和基本护理相关的最小数据集的研究图谱。另一个目的是确定证据中的差距,提出未来的研究问题,以突出护理实践和基本护理术语标准化的必要性。

背景

国际上强调解决基本护理问题是对护理缺失的回应。需要系统的绩效测量来捕捉护理实践结果。

设计

根据范围综述研究方法概述文献。

方法

使用以下纳入标准在 PubMed 和 CINAHL 上进行检索:与最小数据集和护理实践相关的同行评审实证定量和定性研究,以英文发表。没有设置时间限制。排除标准如下:无可用全文、综述以及方法学和论述性研究。数据被分类为基本护理要素之一。

结果

综述包括 1999 年至 2016 年发表的 20 项研究。研究地点主要是疗养院或医院。在 14 项基本护理要素中,有 11 项在纳入的研究中被确定为测量要素,但它们的频率有所不同。最常被识别的要素涉及安全、预防和药物治疗(n=11)、舒适(n=6)和饮食(n=5)。

结论

研究使用了最小数据集,并包含与护理实践和基本护理要素相关的变量。然而,这些变量与护理实践的关系并不总是明确描述的,研究的主要目的也很少是衡量护理干预的结果。需要更有力的研究来关注护理实践和患者结果。

临床相关性

使用最小数据集可以突出护士的工作以及其对直接患者护理的影响。需要适当的模型、系统和标准化术语来促进护理活动的记录。

相似文献

1
Methods, metrics and research gaps around minimum data sets for nursing practice and fundamental care: A scoping literature review.护理实践和基本护理最小数据集的方法、指标和研究空白:范围文献综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2230-2247. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14155. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
How fundamental aspects of nursing care are defined in the literature: A scoping review.护理关怀的基本方面在文献中是如何定义的:范围综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2189-2229. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14313.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Patients' and nurses' experiences of fundamental nursing care: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.患者和护士对基础护理的体验:系统评价和定性综合。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(11-12):1858-1882. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15082. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
6
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Bedside nurses' perspective on the Fundamentals of Care framework and its application in clinical practice: A multi-site focus group interview study.床边护士对关怀基本要素框架的看法及其在临床实践中的应用:多地点焦点组访谈研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Sep;145:104526. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104526. Epub 2023 May 18.
9
Testing a model for person-centred pain management: A systematic review and synthesis guided by the Fundamentals of Care framework.测试以患者为中心的疼痛管理模型:以关怀基本要素框架为指导的系统评价和综合研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):6811-6831. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16770. Epub 2023 May 27.
10
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Xiao's double C nursing model on motor function, daily living activities, and quality of life in stroke patients.肖氏双C护理模式对脑卒中患者运动功能、日常生活活动能力及生活质量的影响
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 14;104(7):e41456. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041456.
2
The development of nursing-sensitive indicators: A critical discussion.护理敏感指标的发展:批判性讨论
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Jul 24;7:100227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100227. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The ILC Maine statement: Time for the fundamental care [r]evolution.
缅因州独立生活中心声明:是时候进行基本护理革命了。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jan;81(1):523-536. doi: 10.1111/jan.16108. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
Nursing research priorities based on CINAHL database: A scoping review.基于CINAHL数据库的护理研究重点:一项范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2019 Dec 26;7(2):483-494. doi: 10.1002/nop2.428. eCollection 2020 Mar.