• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恐怖主义如何影响对民主的态度:2015 年的突尼斯

How Terrorism Affects Attitudes toward Democracy: Tunisia in 2015.

机构信息

University of Western Ontario.

University of Toronto.

出版信息

Can Rev Sociol. 2017 Nov;54(4):519-529. doi: 10.1111/cars.12175.

DOI:10.1111/cars.12175
PMID:29120111
Abstract

Tunisia is the only country that emerged from the Arab Spring as a democracy. However, Tunisian democracy is threatened by political divisions, economic problems, and the threat of terrorist attacks. We shed light on Tunisia's democratic prospects by examining (1) the degree to which major terrorist attacks in 2015 influenced Tunisian public opinion on democracy and (2) the extent to which preference for a democratic system affected opinions on the prospects for democracy in Tunisia. We use data from three waves of a nationwide survey conducted just before and just after Tunisia's first major terrorist attack, and just after the country's second major terrorist attack. We demonstrate that after the attacks the Tunisian public became less favourable toward democracy and less optimistic that Tunisia would soon be ready for it. Such scepticism was widespread, affecting people who preferred democracy as much as those who did not. We conclude that the prospects for Tunisian democracy are more precarious than is sometimes assumed.

摘要

突尼斯是阿拉伯之春后唯一出现的民主国家。然而,突尼斯的民主受到政治分歧、经济问题和恐怖袭击威胁的威胁。我们通过考察以下两个方面,揭示了突尼斯的民主前景:(1)2015 年的重大恐怖袭击在多大程度上影响了突尼斯公众对民主的看法;(2)对民主制度的偏好在多大程度上影响了他们对突尼斯民主前景的看法。我们使用了在突尼斯第一次重大恐怖袭击之前和之后以及该国第二次重大恐怖袭击之后进行的三次全国性调查的数据。我们表明,在袭击之后,突尼斯公众对民主的支持度降低,对突尼斯即将准备好民主的看法也变得不那么乐观。这种怀疑态度很普遍,影响了那些喜欢民主的人和不喜欢民主的人。我们的结论是,突尼斯民主的前景比人们有时想象的更加不稳定。

相似文献

1
How Terrorism Affects Attitudes toward Democracy: Tunisia in 2015.恐怖主义如何影响对民主的态度:2015 年的突尼斯
Can Rev Sociol. 2017 Nov;54(4):519-529. doi: 10.1111/cars.12175.
2
Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks.利用自然实验评估恐怖袭击的选举后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 16;115(42):10624-10629. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800302115. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
3
[Demo-economic theory in Tunisia].[突尼斯的示范经济理论]
Rev Tunis Sci Soc. 1980;17(62):83-9.
4
Will HIV / AIDS undermine democracy in South Africa?艾滋病毒/艾滋病会破坏南非的民主吗?
AIDS Anal Afr. 2000 Jun-Jul;11(1):14.
5
Self-esteem, authoritarianism, and democratic values in the face of threat.面对威胁时的自尊、威权主义和民主价值观。
Psychol Rep. 2004 Aug;95(1):311-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.95.1.311-316.
6
Tunisia WFS [World Fertility Survey].突尼斯世界生育率调查
Popul Today. 1984 Jul-Aug;12(7-8):4-5.
7
Association between feeling threatened by a terrorist attack and subjective health: a web survey a week after the attacks of 22 March 2016 in Belgium.遭受恐怖袭击威胁与主观健康之间的关联:2016年3月22日比利时袭击事件一周后的网络调查
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Aug 10;9(1):1500821. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1500821. eCollection 2018.
8
Family planning in Tunisia and Morocco: a summary and evaluation of the recent record.
Stud Fam Plann. 1971 May;2(5):101-10.
9
Globalization, democracy, and child health in developing countries.全球化、民主与发展中国家儿童健康。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jul;136-137:52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 2.
10
Science is a gateway for democracy.科学是民主的一扇大门。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):313-6. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9455-2. Epub 2013 Jun 30.