• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠风险选择的强化学习模型以及伪装成胜利的损失对冒险行为的促进作用。

Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.

作者信息

Marshall Andrew T, Kirkpatrick Kimberly

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):262-279. doi: 10.1037/xan0000141.

DOI:10.1037/xan0000141
PMID:29120214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5682951/
Abstract

Risky decisions are inherently characterized by the potential to receive gains or incur losses, and these outcomes have distinct effects on subsequent decision-making. One important factor is that individuals engage in loss-chasing, in which the reception of a loss is followed by relatively increased risk-taking. Unfortunately, the mechanisms of loss-chasing are poorly understood, despite the potential importance for understanding pathological choice behavior. The goal of the present experiment was to illuminate the mechanisms governing individual differences in loss-chasing and risky-choice behaviors. Rats chose between a low-uncertainty outcome that always delivered a variable amount of reward and a high-uncertainty outcome that probabilistically delivered reward. Loss-processing and loss-chasing were assessed in the context of losses disguised as wins (LDWs), which are loss outcomes that are presented along with gain-related stimuli. LDWs have been suggested to interfere with adaptive decision-making in humans and thus potentially increase loss-making. Here, the rats presented with LDWs were riskier, in that they made more choices for the high-uncertainty outcome. A series of nonlinear models were fit to individual rats' data to elucidate the possible psychological mechanisms that best account for individual differences in high-uncertainty choices and loss-chasing behaviors. The models suggested that the rats presented with LDWs were more prone to showing a stay bias following high-uncertainty outcomes compared to rats not presented with LDWs. These results collectively suggest that LDWs acquire conditioned reinforcement properties that encourage continued risk-taking and increase loss-chasing following previous high-risk decisions. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

风险决策的本质特征是有可能获得收益或遭受损失,而这些结果对后续决策有着不同的影响。一个重要因素是个体存在损失追逐行为,即遭受损失后会相对增加冒险行为。不幸的是,尽管损失追逐机制对于理解病理性选择行为具有潜在重要性,但人们对此了解甚少。本实验的目的是阐明控制个体在损失追逐和风险选择行为上差异的机制。大鼠在一个总是给予可变数量奖励的低不确定性结果和一个概率性给予奖励的高不确定性结果之间进行选择。在伪装成胜利的损失(LDWs)情境中评估损失处理和损失追逐,LDWs是与收益相关刺激一起呈现的损失结果。有人认为LDWs会干扰人类的适应性决策,从而可能增加损失。在这里,面对LDWs的大鼠更具风险性,因为它们对高不确定性结果做出了更多选择。一系列非线性模型被拟合到个体大鼠的数据上,以阐明最能解释高不确定性选择和损失追逐行为个体差异的可能心理机制。模型表明,与未面对LDWs的大鼠相比,面对LDWs的大鼠在高不确定性结果后更倾向于表现出停留偏差。这些结果共同表明,LDWs获得了条件强化特性,鼓励持续冒险,并在先前的高风险决策后增加损失追逐。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/b0eab0a3a706/nihms885038f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/0bf7a87a32cf/nihms885038f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/aa1e35c5cabd/nihms885038f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/540ffb842e9a/nihms885038f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/4762ee94fea8/nihms885038f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/44117598d40f/nihms885038f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/b0eab0a3a706/nihms885038f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/0bf7a87a32cf/nihms885038f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/aa1e35c5cabd/nihms885038f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/540ffb842e9a/nihms885038f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/4762ee94fea8/nihms885038f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/44117598d40f/nihms885038f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8231/5682951/b0eab0a3a706/nihms885038f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.大鼠风险选择的强化学习模型以及伪装成胜利的损失对冒险行为的促进作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(3):262-279. doi: 10.1037/xan0000141.
2
Investigating the influence of 'losses disguised as wins' on decision making and motivation in rats.探究“伪装成胜利的损失”对大鼠决策和动机的影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;29(8):732-744. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000455.
3
Measuring Gamblers' Behaviour to Show That Negative Sounds Can Reveal the True Nature of Losses Disguised as Wins in Multiline Slot Machines.测量赌徒行为,揭示多线老虎机中伪装成赢钱的损失的真实本质。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Jun;37(2):403-425. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09976-9. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
4
Using sound to unmask losses disguised as wins in multiline slot machines.利用声音揭示多线老虎机中伪装成赢局的输局。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Mar;31(1):183-96. doi: 10.1007/s10899-013-9411-8.
5
Losses Disguised as Wins Affect Game Selection on Multiline Slots.损失伪装成胜利会影响多线插槽的游戏选择。
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Dec;34(4):1377-1390. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9773-z.
6
Do losses disguised as wins create a "sweet spot" for win overestimates in multiline slots play?作为输家的伪装赢家是否为多线插槽游戏中的赢高估创造了“甜蜜点”?
Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106598. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106598. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Gambling despite financial loss-the role of losses disguised as wins in multi-line slots.尽管输钱仍继续赌博——多线老虎机中损失伪装为赢带来的作用。
Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):119-124. doi: 10.1111/add.14406. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Relative gains, losses, and reference points in probabilistic choice in rats.大鼠概率选择中的相对收益、损失和参考点
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 6;10(2):e0117697. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117697. eCollection 2015.
9
Missed losses loom larger than missed gains: Electrodermal reactivity to decision choices and outcomes in a gambling task.错失损失比错失收益更显著:赌博任务中对决策选择和结果的皮肤电反应。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Apr;16(2):353-61. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0395-y.
10
Upping the Reinforcement Rate by Playing the Maximum Lines in Multi-line Slot Machine Play.通过在多线老虎机游戏中玩最大行数来提高强化率。
J Gambl Stud. 2015 Sep;31(3):949-64. doi: 10.1007/s10899-014-9446-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Medial entorhinal cortex mediates learning of context-dependent interval timing behavior.内侧缰状回皮层介导与上下文相关的时间间隔学习行为。
Nat Neurosci. 2024 Aug;27(8):1587-1598. doi: 10.1038/s41593-024-01683-7. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Prior experience modifies acquisition trajectories via response-strategy sampling.先前经验通过反应策略抽样来改变习得轨迹。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jul;26(4):1217-1239. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01769-y. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
3
Translating concepts of risk and loss in rodent models of gambling and the limitations for clinical applications.

本文引用的文献

1
Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.大鼠的次优选择:动机显著性归因促进适应不良的决策。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
2
Chronic administration of the dopamine D agonist ropinirole invigorates performance of a rodent slot machine task, potentially indicative of less distractible or compulsive-like gambling behaviour.长期给予多巴胺 D 激动剂罗匹尼罗可增强啮齿动物老虎机任务的表现,这可能表明其赌博行为的注意力分散程度较低或类似强迫行为。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Jan;234(1):137-153. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4447-y. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
赌博啮齿动物模型中风险与损失概念的翻译以及临床应用的局限性
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020 Feb;31:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.010. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
4
Challenges and Opportunities in Animal Models of Gambling-like Behavior.赌博样行为动物模型中的挑战与机遇
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020 Feb;31:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
The role of 'jackpot' stimuli in maladaptive decision-making: dissociable effects of D1/D2 receptor agonists and antagonists.“ jackpot ” 刺激在适应不良决策中的作用:D1/D2 受体激动剂和拮抗剂的可分离效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 May;235(5):1427-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4851-6. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.
鸽子的次优选择:刺激值预测对频率的选择。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159336. eCollection 2016.
4
The agranular and granular insula differentially contribute to gambling-like behavior on a rat slot machine task: effects of inactivation and local infusion of a dopamine D4 agonist on reward expectancy.无颗粒和有颗粒的脑岛在大鼠老虎机任务中对类似赌博行为有不同贡献:失活和局部注入多巴胺D4激动剂对奖励预期的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Sep;233(17):3135-47. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4355-1. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
5
Nucleus accumbens D2R cells signal prior outcomes and control risky decision-making.伏隔核D2R细胞对先前结果进行信号传递并控制风险决策。
Nature. 2016 Mar 31;531(7596):642-6. doi: 10.1038/nature17400. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
6
Dopamine D3 Receptors Modulate the Ability of Win-Paired Cues to Increase Risky Choice in a Rat Gambling Task.多巴胺D3受体调节赢牌配对线索在大鼠赌博任务中增加风险选择的能力。
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):785-94. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2225-15.2016.
7
Activation of dopamine D4 receptors within the anterior cingulate cortex enhances the erroneous expectation of reward on a rat slot machine task.前扣带皮层内多巴胺D4受体的激活增强了大鼠老虎机任务中对奖励的错误预期。
Neuropharmacology. 2016 Jun;105:186-195. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
Effects of optimism on gambling in the rat slot machine task.乐观情绪对大鼠老虎机任务中赌博行为的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Mar 1;300:97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
Neural correlates of state-based decision-making in younger and older adults.年轻人和老年人基于状态的决策的神经关联
Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 15;130:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
10
Skewed by Cues? The Motivational Role of Audiovisual Stimuli in Modelling Substance Use and Gambling Disorders.受线索影响而产生偏差?视听刺激在模拟物质使用和赌博障碍中的动机作用。
Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016;27:507-29. doi: 10.1007/7854_2015_393.