Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University , 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Galileo Academy of Science and Technology , 1150 Francisco Street, San Francisco, California 94109, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 5;51(23):13859-13868. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03570. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Utilities incorporating the potable reuse of municipal wastewater are interested in converting from the UV/HO to the UV/free chlorine advanced oxidation process (AOP). The AOP treatment of reverse osmosis (RO) permeate often includes the de facto UV/chloramine AOP because chloramines applied upstream permeate RO membranes. Models are needed that accurately predict oxidant photolysis and subsequent radical reactions. By combining radical scavengers and kinetic modeling, we have derived quantum yields for radical generation by the UV photolysis of HOCl, OCl, and NHCl of 0.62, 0.55, and 0.20, respectively, far below previous estimates that incorporated subsequent free chlorine or chloramine scavenging by the Cl and OH daughter radicals. The observed quantum yield for free chlorine loss actually decreased with increasing free chlorine concentration, suggesting scavenging of radicals participating in free chlorine chain decomposition and even free chlorine reformation. Consideration of reactions of ClO and its daughter products (e.g., ClO), not included in previous models, were critical for modeling free chlorine loss. Radical reactions (indirect photolysis) accounted for ∼50% of chloramine decay and ∼80% of free chlorine loss or reformation. The performance of the UV/chloramine AOP was comparable to the UV/HO AOP for degradation of 1,4-dioxane, benzoate and carbamazepine across pH 5.5-8.3. The UV/free chlorine AOP was more efficient at pH 5.5, but only by 30% for 1,4-dioxane. At pH 7.0-8.3, the UV/free chlorine AOP was less efficient. Cl converts to OH. The modeled Cl:OH ratio was ∼20% for the UV/free chlorine AOP and ∼35% for the UV/chloramine AOP such that OH was generally more important for contaminant degradation.
采用市政污水再生利用技术的企业,对从 UV/HO 工艺向 UV/自由氯高级氧化工艺(AOP)的转变很感兴趣。反渗透(RO)渗透液的 AOP 处理通常包括事实上的 UV/氯胺 AOP,因为氯胺被施加到 RO 膜上游的渗透液中。需要建立准确预测氧化剂光解和随后自由基反应的模型。通过结合自由基清除剂和动力学建模,我们分别得出了 HOCl、OCl 和 NHCl 的 UV 光解产生自由基的量子产率为 0.62、0.55 和 0.20,远低于之前将后续自由氯或氯胺自由基清除纳入的估计值。观察到的自由氯损失量子产率实际上随着自由氯浓度的增加而降低,这表明自由基参与了自由氯链分解甚至自由氯再形成的清除。考虑到之前模型中未包含的 ClO 和其产物(例如 ClO)的反应,对于自由氯损失的建模至关重要。自由基反应(间接光解)占氯胺衰减的约 50%,占自由氯损失或再形成的约 80%。在 pH 5.5-8.3 范围内,UV/氯胺 AOP 与 UV/HO AOP 相比,对于 1,4-二恶烷、苯甲酸和卡马西平的降解性能相当。在 pH 5.5 时,UV/自由氯 AOP 的效率更高,但对于 1,4-二恶烷仅提高了 30%。在 pH 7.0-8.3 时,UV/自由氯 AOP 的效率较低。Cl 转化为 OH。UV/自由氯 AOP 的模型 Cl:OH 比值约为 20%,UV/氯胺 AOP 的模型 Cl:OH 比值约为 35%,因此 OH 通常更有利于污染物降解。