• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗计划者:一项评估电子病历系统集成、需求导向的应用平台可接受性和可用性的试点研究。

Palliative Care Planner: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Acceptability and Usability of an Electronic Health Records System-integrated, Needs-targeted App Platform.

机构信息

1 Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

2 Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):59-68. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-500OC.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-500OC
PMID:29121480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5812235/
Abstract

RATIONALE

The quality and patient-centeredness of intensive care unit (ICU)-based palliative care delivery is highly variable.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and pilot an app platform for clinicians and ICU patients and their family members that enhances the delivery of needs-targeted palliative care.

METHODS

In the development phase of the study, we developed an electronic health record (EHR) system-integrated mobile web app system prototype, PCplanner (Palliative Care Planner). PCplanner screens the EHR for ICU patients meeting any of five prompts (triggers) for palliative care consultation, allows families to report their unmet palliative care needs, and alerts clinicians to these needs. The evaluation phase included a prospective before/after study conducted at a large academic medical center. Two control populations were enrolled in the before period to serve as context for the intervention. First, 25 ICU patients who received palliative care consults served as patient-level controls. Second, 49 family members of ICU patients who received mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours served as family-level controls. Afterward, 14 patients, 18 family members, and 10 clinicians participated in the intervention evaluation period. Family member outcomes measured at baseline and 4 days later included acceptability (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire [CSQ]), usability (Systems Usability Scale [SUS]), and palliative care needs, assessed with the adapted needs of social nature, existential concerns, symptoms, and therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale; the Patient-Centeredness of Care Scale (PCCS); and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Patient outcomes included frequency of goal concordant treatment, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Family members reported high PCplanner acceptability (mean CSQ, 14.1 [SD, 1.4]) and usability (mean SUS, 21.1 [SD, 1.7]). PCplanner family member recipients experienced a 12.7-unit reduction in NEST score compared with a 3.4-unit increase among controls (P = 0.002), as well as improved mean scores on the PCCS (6.6 [SD, 5.8]) and the PSS (-0.8 [SD, 1.9]). The frequency of goal-concordant treatment increased over the course of the intervention (n = 14 [SD, 79%] vs. n = 18 [SD, 100%]). Compared with palliative care controls, intervention patients received palliative care consultation sooner (3.9 [SD, 2.7] vs. 6.9 [SD, 7.1] mean days), had a shorter mean hospital length of stay (20.5 [SD, 9.1] vs. 22.3 [SD, 16.0] patient number), and received hospice care more frequently (5 [36%] vs. 5 [20%]), although these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

PCplanner represents an acceptable, usable, and clinically promising systems-based approach to delivering EHR-triggered, needs-targeted ICU-based palliative care within a standard clinical workflow. A clinical trial in a larger population is needed to evaluate its efficacy.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房(ICU)姑息治疗的质量和以患者为中心的程度差异很大。

目的

开发并试点一种针对临床医生和 ICU 患者及其家属的应用程序平台,以增强以需求为导向的姑息治疗的实施。

方法

在研究的开发阶段,我们开发了一种电子健康记录(EHR)系统集成的移动网络应用程序系统原型,即 PCplanner(姑息治疗计划器)。PCplanner 从符合以下五种提示(触发条件)之一的 ICU 患者的 EHR 中筛选出姑息治疗咨询对象,允许家属报告他们未满足的姑息治疗需求,并向临床医生发出这些需求的警报。评估阶段包括在一家大型学术医疗中心进行的前瞻性前后研究。在干预前阶段,纳入了两个对照组,作为干预的背景。首先,25 名接受姑息治疗咨询的 ICU 患者作为患者层面的对照组。其次,49 名接受至少 48 小时机械通气的 ICU 患者的家属作为家庭层面的对照组。之后,14 名患者、18 名家属和 10 名临床医生参与了干预评估阶段。基线和 4 天后评估的家庭成员结果包括可接受性(客户满意度问卷 [CSQ])、可用性(系统可用性量表 [SUS]),以及通过适应后的社会需求、存在问题、症状和治疗互动(NEST)量表、关怀患者程度量表(PCCS)和压力知觉量表(PSS)评估的姑息治疗需求。患者结果包括目标一致治疗的频率、住院时间和出院去向。

结果

家属报告 PCplanner 的接受度(平均 CSQ,14.1[SD,1.4])和可用性(平均 SUS,21.1[SD,1.7])均很高。与对照组的 3.4 分增加相比,PCplanner 家属的 NEST 评分降低了 12.7 分(P = 0.002),PCCS(6.6[SD,5.8])和 PSS(-0.8[SD,1.9])的平均得分也有所提高。治疗目标的一致性在干预过程中有所增加(n = 14[SD,79%] vs. n = 18[SD,100%])。与姑息治疗对照组相比,干预组患者更早接受姑息治疗咨询(3.9[SD,2.7] vs. 6.9[SD,7.1]平均天数),住院时间更短(20.5[SD,9.1] vs. 22.3[SD,16.0]患者数),更频繁地接受临终关怀(5[36%] vs. 5[20%]),尽管这些差异没有统计学意义。

结论

PCplanner 是一种可接受、可用且具有临床前景的系统方法,可在标准临床工作流程中提供基于 EHR 触发的、以需求为导向的 ICU 姑息治疗。需要在更大的人群中进行临床试验来评估其疗效。

相似文献

1
Palliative Care Planner: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Acceptability and Usability of an Electronic Health Records System-integrated, Needs-targeted App Platform.姑息治疗计划者:一项评估电子病历系统集成、需求导向的应用平台可接受性和可用性的试点研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):59-68. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-500OC.
2
Operationalizing needs-focused palliative care for older adults in intensive care units: Design of and rationale for the PCplanner randomized clinical trial.将以需求为导向的老年重症加强护理病房姑息治疗付诸实践:PCplanner 随机临床试验的设计和原理。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Nov;98:106163. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106163. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Mobile Application-Based Communication Facilitation Platform for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于移动应用的危重症患者家属沟通促进平台:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2349666. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49666.
4
Improving racial disparities in unmet palliative care needs among intensive care unit family members with a needs-targeted app intervention: The ICUconnect randomized clinical trial.通过以需求为导向的应用程序干预改善重症监护病房家庭成员未满足的姑息治疗需求方面的种族差异:ICUconnect随机临床试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Apr;103:106319. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106319. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
5
Medical Record Quality Assessments of Palliative Care for Intensive Care Unit Patients. Do They Match the Perspectives of Nurses and Families?重症监护病房患者姑息治疗的病历质量评估。它们与护士和家属的观点相符吗?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 May;13(5):690-8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201508-501OC.
6
Preliminary report of the integration of a palliative care team into an intensive care unit.重症监护病房姑息治疗团队整合的初步报告。
Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;24(2):154-65. doi: 10.1177/0269216309346540. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
7
Effects of mindfulness training programmes delivered by a self-directed mobile app and by telephone compared with an education programme for survivors of critical illness: a pilot randomised clinical trial.自我指导型手机应用程序和电话提供的正念训练方案与重症幸存者教育方案相比对其效果:一项先导随机临床试验。
Thorax. 2019 Jan;74(1):33-42. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211264. Epub 2018 May 23.
8
Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction Model for Targeted Palliative Care Among Hospitalized Medical Patients: a Pilot Quasi-experimental Study.电子健康记录在院医疗患者目标性姑息治疗死亡率预测模型:一项试点类实验研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1841-1847. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05169-2. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
9
Assessment of Clinical Palliative Care Trigger Status vs Actual Needs Among Critically Ill Patients and Their Family Members.评估危重症患者及其家属的临床姑息治疗触发状态与实际需求。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144093. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44093.
10
Palliative Care Needs Assessment in the Neuro-ICU: Effect on Family.神经重症监护病房的姑息治疗需求评估:对家庭的影响。
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Oct;27(2):163-172. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0426-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Centered Measures of Goal Concordance in Geriatrics and Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.老年医学与姑息治疗中以患者为中心的目标一致性衡量方法:一项范围综述
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2530370. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30370.
2
Clinical and economic impact of digital dashboards on hospital inpatient care: a systematic review.数字仪表盘对医院住院护理的临床和经济影响:一项系统综述
JAMIA Open. 2025 Jul 26;8(4):ooaf078. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf078. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Palliative care in acute care surgery: research challenges and opportunities.急性护理手术中的姑息治疗:研究挑战与机遇
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 Mar 18;10(1):e001615. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001615. eCollection 2025.
4
Mobile App-Facilitated Collaborative Palliative Care Intervention for Critically Ill Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.针对重症老年患者的移动应用程序辅助协作姑息治疗干预:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):173-183. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6838.
5
Usability evaluation of electronic health records at the trauma and emergency directorates at the Komfo Anokye teaching hospital in the Ashanti region of Ghana.加纳阿散蒂地区科姆福·安诺耶教学医院创伤和急诊部门电子病历的可用性评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02636-7.
6
Mobile Application-Based Communication Facilitation Platform for Family Members of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于移动应用的危重症患者家属沟通促进平台:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2349666. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49666.
7
Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Critical Care Nephrology.探索聊天机器人在重症监护肾脏病学中的潜力。
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Oct 20;10(10):58. doi: 10.3390/medicines10100058.
8
Clinical Decision Support Systems for Palliative Care Management: A Scoping Review.临床决策支持系统在姑息治疗管理中的应用:综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):e205-e218. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
9
Usability of a mobile application for health professionals in home care services: a user-centered approach.移动应用程序在家庭护理服务中供健康专业人员使用的可用性:一种以用户为中心的方法。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 14;13(1):2607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29640-7.
10
Determining Goal Concordant Care in the Intensive Care Unit Using Electronic Health Records.使用电子健康记录确定重症监护病房中的目标一致的护理。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Mar;65(3):e199-e205. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a Research Agenda for Integrating Palliative Care into Critical Care and Pulmonary Practice To Improve Patient and Family Outcomes.制定将姑息治疗纳入重症监护和肺部医疗实践的研究议程以改善患者及家属的治疗结果。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):329-343. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0567.
2
Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.晚期痴呆症护理目标干预的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jan 1;177(1):24-31. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031.
3
Association of Increasing Use of Mechanical Ventilation Among Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia and Intensive Care Unit Beds.养老院中患有晚期痴呆症的居民和 ICU 床位的机械通气使用量不断增加的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Dec 1;176(12):1809-1816. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5964.
4
Improving ICU-Based Palliative Care Delivery: A Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Survey of Critical Care Clinician Attitudes and Beliefs.改善基于重症监护病房的姑息治疗服务:一项关于重症监护临床医生态度和信念的多中心、多学科调查。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):e372-e378. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002099.
5
Quality of End-of-Life Care Provided to Patients With Different Serious Illnesses.不同严重疾病患者临终关怀质量。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Aug 1;176(8):1095-102. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.1200.
6
Impact of Inpatient Palliative Care on Treatment Intensity for Patients with Serious Illness.住院姑息治疗对重症患者治疗强度的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2016 Sep;19(9):936-42. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0240. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
7
Medical Record Quality Assessments of Palliative Care for Intensive Care Unit Patients. Do They Match the Perspectives of Nurses and Families?重症监护病房患者姑息治疗的病历质量评估。它们与护士和家属的观点相符吗?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 May;13(5):690-8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201508-501OC.
8
Integrating Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit. Evidence Gaps and Quality Gaps.在重症监护病房整合姑息治疗。证据差距与质量差距。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 May;13(5):595-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201601-061ED.
9
A Novel Picture Guide to Improve Spiritual Care and Reduce Anxiety in Mechanically Ventilated Adults in the Intensive Care Unit.一本新颖的图片指南,旨在改善重症监护病房中接受机械通气的成年患者的精神护理并减轻焦虑。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Aug;13(8):1333-42. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201512-831OC.
10
SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records.基于快速医疗互操作性资源的智能医疗:一个用于电子健康记录的基于标准的、可互操作的应用程序平台。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):899-908. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv189. Epub 2016 Feb 17.