Pignata Maud, Chouaid Christos, Le Lay Katell, Luciani Laura, McConnachie Ceilidh, Gordon James, Roze Stéphane
HEVA-HEOR, Lyon.
Centre Hospitalier, Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Oct 25;9:655-668. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S136657. eCollection 2017.
Lung cancer has the highest mortality rate of all cancers worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85% of all lung cancers and has an extremely poor prognosis. Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family blocker designed to suppress cellular signaling and inhibit cellular growth and is approved in Europe after platinum-based therapy for squamous NSCLC. The objective of the present analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of afatinib after platinum-based therapy for squamous NSCLC in France.
The study population was based on the LUX-Lung 8 trial that compared afatinib with erlotinib in patients with squamous NSCLC. The analysis was performed from the perspective of all health care funders and affected patients. A partitioned survival model was developed to evaluate cost-effectiveness based on progression-free survival and overall survival in the trial. Life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and direct costs were evaluated over a 10-year time horizon. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 4% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
Model projections indicated that afatinib was associated with greater life expectancy (0.16 years) and quality-adjusted life expectancy (0.094 quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]) than that projected for erlotinib. The total cost of treatment over a 10-year time horizon was higher for afatinib than erlotinib, EUR12,364 versus EUR9,510, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR30,277 per QALY gained for afatinib versus erlotinib. Sensitivity analyses showed that the base case findings were stable under variation of a range of model inputs.
Based on data from the LUX-Lung 8 trial, afatinib was projected to improve clinical outcomes versus erlotinib, with a 97% probability of being cost-effective assuming a willingness to pay of EUR70,000 per QALY gained, after platinum-based therapy in patients with squamous NSCLC in France.
肺癌是全球所有癌症中死亡率最高的。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有肺癌的85%,预后极差。阿法替尼是一种不可逆的表皮生长因子受体(ErbB)家族阻滞剂,旨在抑制细胞信号传导并抑制细胞生长,在欧洲被批准用于经铂类治疗后的鳞状NSCLC。本分析的目的是评估在法国,阿法替尼用于经铂类治疗后的鳞状NSCLC的成本效益。
研究人群基于LUX-Lung 8试验,该试验比较了阿法替尼与厄洛替尼在鳞状NSCLC患者中的疗效。分析是从所有医疗保健资助者和受影响患者的角度进行的。开发了一个分区生存模型,以根据试验中的无进展生存期和总生存期评估成本效益。在10年的时间范围内评估预期寿命、质量调整预期寿命和直接成本。未来成本和临床效益按每年4%进行贴现。进行了确定性和概率性敏感性分析。
模型预测表明,与厄洛替尼相比,阿法替尼可带来更长的预期寿命(0.16年)和质量调整预期寿命(0.094质量调整生命年[QALYs])。在10年的时间范围内,阿法替尼的总治疗成本高于厄洛替尼,分别为12364欧元和9510欧元,导致阿法替尼相对于厄洛替尼每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比为30277欧元。敏感性分析表明,在一系列模型输入变量的情况下,基本情况的结果是稳定的。
基于LUX-Lung 8试验的数据,预计在法国,对于经铂类治疗的鳞状NSCLC患者,与厄洛替尼相比,阿法替尼可改善临床结局,假设每获得一个QALY的支付意愿为70000欧元,则其具有成本效益的概率为97%。