Devitt Brian M, Bell Stuart W, Ardern Clare L, Hartwig Taylor, Porter Tabitha J, Feller Julian A, Webster Kate E
OrthoSport Victoria, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2017 Oct 24;5(10):2325967117731767. doi: 10.1177/2325967117731767. eCollection 2017 Oct.
The role of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) to augment primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial.
To determine whether the addition of LEAT to primary ACLR provides greater control of rotational laxity and improves clinical outcomes compared with ACLR alone and to assess the impact of early versus delayed ACLR.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
Two reviewers independently searched 7 databases for randomized and nonrandomized clinical studies comparing ACLR plus LEAT versus ACLR alone. Animal, cadaveric, and biomechanical studies; revision or repair procedures; and studies using synthetic ligaments and multiligamentous-injured knees were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with a modified Downs and Black checklist. The primary outcome was postoperative pivot shift. These data were pooled by use of a fixed-effects meta-analysis model. The studies were divided into delayed (>12 months) and early (≤12 months) reconstruction groups for meta-analysis. A best-evidence synthesis was performed on the remaining outcome measures.
Of 387 titles identified, 11 articles were included (5 of high quality). Meta-analysis of postoperative pivot shift in 3 studies of delayed primary ACLR showed a statistically significant difference for the pivot-shift test in favor of ACLR with LEAT (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.81; = .008; = 0). Meta-analysis of 5 studies of early primary ACLR found no statistically significant difference with the addition of LEAT (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.33-1.09; = .10; = 33%). Insufficient evidence was available to determine whether the addition of LEAT had any effect on clinical, objective, subjective, and functional outcomes.
In primary ACLR, no evidence is available showing additional benefit of LEAT in reducing the postoperative pivot shift in early reconstructions (≤12 months); however, LEAT may have a role in delayed ACLR. Strong evidence exists that a combined ACLR and LEAT reduces lateral femoral translation, but there is insufficient evidence to identify any benefit for other clinical outcomes.
外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LEAT)用于增强初次前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)的作用仍存在争议。
确定与单纯ACLR相比,初次ACLR联合LEAT是否能更好地控制旋转松弛并改善临床结果,并评估早期与延迟ACLR的影响。
系统评价;证据等级,3级。
两名评价者独立检索7个数据库,以查找比较ACLR联合LEAT与单纯ACLR的随机和非随机临床研究。排除动物、尸体和生物力学研究;翻修或修复手术;以及使用合成韧带和多韧带损伤膝关节的研究。使用改良的唐斯和布莱克清单评估偏倚风险。主要结局是术后轴移。这些数据通过固定效应荟萃分析模型进行汇总。为进行荟萃分析,将研究分为延迟(>12个月)和早期(≤12个月)重建组。对其余结局指标进行最佳证据综合分析。
在识别出的387篇标题中,纳入了11篇文章(5篇高质量)。对3项延迟初次ACLR研究的术后轴移进行荟萃分析,结果显示轴移试验存在统计学显著差异,支持ACLR联合LEAT(优势比[OR],0.44;95%置信区间[CI],0.24 - 0.81;P = .008;I² = 0)。对5项早期初次ACLR研究进行荟萃分析,发现联合LEAT无统计学显著差异(OR,0.60;95% CI,0.33 - 1.09;P = .10;I² = 33%)。没有足够的证据来确定添加LEAT是否对临床、客观、主观和功能结局有任何影响。
在初次ACLR中,没有证据表明LEAT在早期重建(≤12个月)中对减少术后轴移有额外益处;然而,LEAT可能在延迟ACLR中发挥作用。有强有力的证据表明,ACLR联合LEAT可减少股骨外侧移位,但没有足够的证据确定对其他临床结局有任何益处。