Nebeker Camille, Harlow John, Espinoza Giacinto Rebeca, Orozco-Linares Rubi, Bloss Cinnamon S, Weibel Nadir
a Department of Family Medicine and Public Health , School of Medicine, University of California San Diego.
b Center for Wireless and Population Health Systems , Qualcomm Institute, University of California San Diego.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):266-276. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1403980.
Vast quantities of personal health information and private identifiable information are being created through mobile apps, wearable sensors, and social networks. While new strategies and tools for obtaining health data have expanded researchers' abilities to design and test personalized and adaptive health interventions, the deployment of pervasive sensing and computational techniques to gather research data is raising ethical challenges for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) charged with protecting research participants. To explore experiences with, and perceptions about, technology-enabled research, and identify solutions for promoting responsible conduct of this research we conducted focus groups with human research protection program and IRB affiliates. Our findings outline the need for increased collaboration across stakeholders in terms of: (1) shared and dynamic resources that improve awareness of technologies and decrease potential threats to participant privacy and data confidentiality, and (2) development of appropriate and dynamic standards through collaboration with stakeholders in the research ethics community.
通过移动应用程序、可穿戴传感器和社交网络,正在产生大量的个人健康信息和可识别的私人信息。虽然获取健康数据的新策略和工具扩大了研究人员设计和测试个性化及适应性健康干预措施的能力,但部署普及的传感和计算技术来收集研究数据,给负责保护研究参与者的机构审查委员会(IRB)带来了伦理挑战。为了探索对技术支持的研究的经验和看法,并确定促进此类研究负责任开展的解决方案,我们与人类研究保护计划及IRB附属机构进行了焦点小组讨论。我们的研究结果概述了各利益相关方在以下方面加强合作的必要性:(1)共享和动态的资源,提高对技术的认识,减少对参与者隐私和数据保密性的潜在威胁;(2)通过与研究伦理界的利益相关方合作,制定适当和动态的标准。