Cloney Michael B, Hopkins Benjamin, Dhillon Ekamjeet S, Dahdaleh Nader S
1Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, and.
2Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):88-95. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161399. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
OBJECTIVE Venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), including both deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism, are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after spine surgery. Prophylactic anticoagulation, or chemoprophylaxis, can prevent VTE. However, the timing of VTEs after spine surgery and the effect of chemoprophylaxis on VTE timing remain underinvestigated. METHODS The records of 6869 consecutive spine surgeries were retrospectively examined. Data on patient demographics, surgical variables, hospital course, and timing of VTEs were collected. Patients who received chemoprophylaxis were compared with those who did not. Appropriate regression models were used to examine selection for chemoprophylaxis and the timing of VTEs. RESULTS Age (OR 1.037, 95% CI 1.023-1.051; p < 0.001), longer surgery (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.002-1.004; p < 0.001), history of DVT (OR 1.697, 95% CI 1.038-2.776; p = 0.035), and fusion surgery (OR 1.917, 95% CI 1.356-2.709; p < 0.001) predicted selection for chemoprophylaxis. Chemoprophylaxis patients experienced more VTEs (3.62% vs 2.03% of patients, respectively; p < 0.001), and also required longer hospital stays (5.0 days vs 1.0 days; HR 0.5107; p < 0.0001) and had a greater time to the occurrence of VTE (median 6.8 days vs 3.6 days; HR 0.6847; p = 0.0003). The cumulative incidence of VTEs correlated with the postoperative day in both groups (Spearman r = 0.9746, 95% CI 0.9457-0.9883, and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; Spearman r = 0.9061, 95% CI 0.8065-0.9557, and p < 0.0001 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), and the cumulative incidence of VTEs was higher in the nonchemoprophylaxis group throughout the 30-day postoperative period. Cumulative VTE incidence and postoperative day were linearly correlated in the first 2 postoperative weeks (R = 0.9396 and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; R = 0.8190 and p = 0.0003 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group) and the remainder of the 30-day postoperative period (R = 0.9535 and p < 0.0001 for the chemoprophylaxis group; R = 0.6562 and p = 0.0058 for the nonchemoprophylaxis group), but the linear relationships differ between these 2 postoperative periods (p < 0.0001 for both groups). CONCLUSIONS Anticoagulation reduces the cumulative incidence of VTE after spine surgery. The cumulative incidence of VTEs rises linearly in the first 2 postoperative weeks and then plateaus. Surgeons should consider early initiation of chemoprophylaxis for patients undergoing spine surgery.
目的 静脉血栓栓塞事件(VTEs),包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞,是脊柱手术后发病和死亡的主要原因。预防性抗凝,即化学预防,可以预防VTE。然而,脊柱手术后VTE的发生时间以及化学预防对VTE发生时间的影响仍未得到充分研究。方法 回顾性检查6869例连续脊柱手术的记录。收集患者人口统计学、手术变量、住院过程和VTE发生时间的数据。将接受化学预防的患者与未接受化学预防的患者进行比较。使用适当的回归模型来研究化学预防的选择和VTE的发生时间。结果 年龄(OR 1.037,95%CI 1.023 - 1.051;p < 0.001)、手术时间较长(OR 1.003,95%CI 1.002 - 1.004;p < 0.001)、DVT病史(OR 1.697,95%CI 1.038 - 2.776;p = 0.035)和融合手术(OR 1.917,95%CI 1.356 - 2.709;p < 0.001)可预测化学预防的选择。接受化学预防的患者发生VTE的情况更多(分别为患者的3.62%和2.03%;p < 0.001),并且住院时间更长(5.0天对1.0天;HR 0.5107;p < 0.0001),VTE发生的时间更长(中位数6.8天对3.6天;HR 0.6847;p = 0.0003)。两组中VTE的累积发生率均与术后天数相关(化学预防组Spearman r = 0.9746,95%CI 0.9457 - 0.9883,p < 0.0001;非化学预防组Spearman r = 0.9061,95%CI 0.8065 - 0.9557,p < 0.0001),并且在术后30天内非化学预防组的VTE累积发生率更高。术后前2周内VTE累积发生率与术后天数呈线性相关(化学预防组R = 0.9396,p < 0.0001;非化学预防组R = 0.8190,p = 0.0003)以及术后30天剩余时间内(化学预防组R = 0.9535,p < 0.0001;非化学预防组R = 0.6562,p = 0.0058),但这两个术后时期的线性关系不同(两组p均< 0.0001)。结论 抗凝可降低脊柱手术后VTE的累积发生率。VTE的累积发生率在术后前2周呈线性上升,然后趋于平稳。外科医生应考虑对接受脊柱手术的患者尽早开始化学预防。