Pettis Jeffery S, Rose Robyn, Chaimanee Veeranan
Bee Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, Maryland, United States of America.
Plant Protection and Quarantine, USDA-APHIS, Riverdale, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 10;12(11):e0188063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188063. eCollection 2017.
At least two parasitic mites have moved from Asian species of honeybees to infest Apis mellifera. Of these two, Varroa destructor is more widespread globally while Tropilaelaps mercedesae has remained largely in Asia. Tropilaelaps mites are most problematic when A. mellifera is managed outside its native range in contact with Asian species of Apis. In areas where this occurs, beekeepers of A. mellifera treat aggressively for Tropilaelaps and Varroa is either outcompeted or is controlled as a result of the aggressive treatment regime used against Tropilaelaps. Many mite control products used worldwide may in fact control both mites but environmental conditions differ globally and thus a control product that works well in one area may be less or ineffective in other areas. This is especially true of volatile compounds. In the current research we tested several commercial products known to control Varroa and powdered sulfur for efficacy against Tropilaelaps. Additionally, we tested the cultural control method of making a hive division to reduce Tropilaelaps growth in both the parent and offspring colony. Making a split or nucleus colony significantly reduced mite population in both the parent and nucleus colony when compared to un-manipulated control colonies. The formic acid product, Mite-Away Quick Strips®, was the only commercial product that significantly reduced mite population 8 weeks after initiation of treatment without side effects. Sulfur also reduced mite populations but both sulfur and Hopguard® significantly impacted colony growth by reducing adult bee populations. Apivar® (amitraz) strips had no effect on mite or adult bee populations under the conditions tested.
至少有两种寄生螨已从亚洲蜜蜂物种转移到西方蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)上寄生。在这两种螨中,狄斯瓦螨(Varroa destructor)在全球分布更广,而梅氏热厉螨(Tropilaelaps mercedesae)主要仍分布在亚洲。当西方蜜蜂在其原生范围之外与亚洲蜜蜂物种接触饲养时,热厉螨造成的问题最为严重。在发生这种情况的地区,西方蜜蜂的养蜂人会积极防治热厉螨,而狄斯瓦螨要么因竞争而减少,要么由于针对热厉螨采取的积极防治措施而得到控制。全球使用的许多杀螨产品实际上可能对这两种螨都有效,但全球环境条件不同,因此在一个地区效果良好的防治产品在其他地区可能效果较差或无效。挥发性化合物尤其如此。在当前的研究中,我们测试了几种已知可防治狄斯瓦螨的商业产品以及硫磺对热厉螨的防治效果。此外,我们还测试了通过分蜂来减少亲代和子代蜂群中热厉螨数量的养殖防治方法。与未处理的对照蜂群相比,分蜂或组建核群显著减少了亲代和核群中的螨数量。甲酸产品Mite-Away Quick Strips®是唯一一种在处理8周后能显著减少螨数量且无副作用的商业产品。硫磺也减少了螨数量,但硫磺和Hopguard®都通过减少成年蜜蜂数量对蜂群生长产生了显著影响。在测试条件下,Apivar®(双甲脒)条带对螨或成年蜜蜂数量没有影响。