Suppr超能文献

快速调查技术用于检测恙螨(中气门目:恙螨科)。

A rapid survey technique for Tropilaelaps mite (Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) detection.

机构信息

USDA-ARS Bee Research Laboratory, Bldg. 476 BARC-E, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2013 Aug;106(4):1535-44. doi: 10.1603/ec12339.

Abstract

Parasitic Tropilaelaps (Delfinado and Baker) mites are a damaging pest of European honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in Asia. These mites represent a significant threat if introduced to other regions of the world, warranting implementation of Tropilaelaps mite surveillance in uninfested regions. Current Tropilaelaps mite-detection methods are unsuitable for efficient large scale screening. We developed and tested a new bump technique that consists of firmly rapping a honey bee brood frame over a collecting pan. Our method was easier to implement than current detection tests, reduced time spent in each apiary, and minimized brood destruction. This feasibility increase overcomes the test's decreased rate of detecting infested colonies (sensitivity; 36.3% for the bump test, 54.2% and 56.7% for the two most sensitive methods currently used in Asia). Considering this sensitivity, we suggest that screening programs sample seven colonies per apiary (independent of apiary size) and 312 randomly selected apiaries in a region to be 95% sure of detecting an incipient Tropilaelaps mite invasion. Further analyses counter the currently held view that Tropilaelaps mites prefer drone bee brood cells. Tropilaelaps mite infestation rate was 3.5 +/- 0.9% in drone brood and 5.7 +/- 0.6% in worker brood. We propose the bump test as a standard tool for monitoring of Tropilaelaps mite presence in regions thought to be free from infestation. However, regulators may favor the sensitivity of the Drop test (collecting mites that fall to the bottom of a hive on sticky boards) over the less time-intensive Bump test.

摘要

寄生的嗜革螨(Delfinado 和 Baker)是亚洲欧洲蜜蜂(Apis mellifera L.)的一种有害害虫。如果这些螨虫传入世界其他地区,将构成重大威胁,因此有必要在未受感染的地区实施嗜革螨监测。目前的嗜革螨检测方法不适合高效的大规模筛查。我们开发并测试了一种新的敲击技术,该技术包括在收集盘上牢固地敲击蜜蜂幼虫框架。与当前的检测测试相比,我们的方法更容易实施,每个蜂场的时间花费更少,对幼虫的破坏最小。这种可行性的提高克服了测试对受感染蜂群的检测率降低的问题(敏感性;敲击测试为 36.3%,亚洲目前使用的两种最敏感的方法分别为 54.2%和 56.7%)。考虑到这种敏感性,我们建议筛选计划对每个蜂场抽取七个样本(独立于蜂场规模),并对一个地区的 312 个随机选择的蜂场进行检测,以有 95%的把握检测到嗜革螨的初期入侵。进一步的分析反驳了目前认为嗜革螨更喜欢雄蜂幼虫细胞的观点。在雄蜂幼虫和工蜂幼虫中,嗜革螨的感染率分别为 3.5 +/- 0.9%和 5.7 +/- 0.6%。我们建议敲击测试作为监测被认为未受感染地区嗜革螨存在的标准工具。然而,监管机构可能更倾向于选择落板检测(收集粘在蜂箱底部的螨虫)的敏感性,而不是耗时较少的敲击检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验