Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Feb;77(2):293-299. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211989. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
To compare the CT Syndesmophyte Score (CTSS) for low-dose CT (ldCT) with the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) for conventional radiographs (CR) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Patients with AS in the Sensitive Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis cohort had lateral cervical and lumbar spine CR and whole spine ldCT at baseline and 2 years. CR and ldCT images were scored by two readers, paired by patient, blinded to time order, per imaging modality. For the total score analysis, we used average scores of readers per corner on CR or quadrant on ldCT. For the syndesmophyte analysis we used individual reader and consensus scores, regarding new or growing syndesmophyte at the same corner/quadrant.
50 patients were included in the syndesmophyte analysis and 37 in the total score analysis. Mean (SD) status scores for mSASSS (range 0-72) and CTSS (range 0-552) at baseline were 17.9 (13.8) and 161.6 (126.6), and mean progression was 2.4 (3.8) and 17.9 (22.1). Three times as many patients showed new or growing syndesmophytes at ≥3 quadrants on ldCT compared with ≥3 corners on CR for individual readers; for consensus this increased to five times. In 50 patients, 36 new or growing syndesmophytes are seen on CR compared with 151 on ldCT, most being found in the thoracic spine.
ldCT, covering the whole spine, detects more progression in the form of new and growing syndesmophytes in patients with AS compared with CR, which is limited to the cervical and lumbar spine. Most progression occurred in the thoracic spine.
比较强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者低剂量 CT(ldCT)的 CT 骨桥评分(CTSS)与传统 X 线(CR)改良的 Stoke 强直性脊柱炎脊柱评分(mSASSS)。
敏感影像学在强直性脊柱炎队列中,患者基线和 2 年时进行颈椎和腰椎侧位 CR 和全脊柱 ldCT。CR 和 ldCT 图像由两位读者进行评分,每一位读者与患者配对,按时间顺序进行盲法评估,根据成像方式进行评分。对于总分分析,我们使用 CR 每个角或 ldCT 每个象限的两位读者的平均评分。对于骨桥分析,我们使用单个读者和共识评分,评估同一角/象限的新骨桥或生长骨桥。
50 例患者纳入骨桥分析,37 例患者纳入总分分析。基线时 mSASSS(范围 0-72)和 CTSS(范围 0-552)的平均(标准差)状态评分分别为 17.9(13.8)和 161.6(126.6),平均进展分别为 2.4(3.8)和 17.9(22.1)。对于单个读者,与 CR 的≥3 个角相比,ldCT 上≥3 个象限出现新的或生长的骨桥的患者多 3 倍;共识时,这个数字增加到 5 倍。在 50 例患者中,CR 上发现 36 个新的或生长的骨桥,而 ldCT 上发现 151 个,大多位于胸椎。
与 CR 相比,覆盖整个脊柱的 ldCT 检测到更多的新的和生长的骨桥在 AS 患者中出现进展,而 CR 仅限于颈椎和腰椎。大多数进展发生在胸椎。