Bagge Louise, Blomström Per, Jidéus Lena, Lönnerholm Stefan, Blomström-Lundqvist Carina
Department of Cardiology, Institution of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Institution of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;50(2):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s10840-017-0290-2. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Epicardial pulmonary vein isolation has become an increasingly used therapy for medically resistant atrial fibrillation. The purpose of the present study was therefore to evaluate if epicardial pulmonary vein isolation combined with ganglionated plexi ablation affects the size and mechanical function of the left atrium, and whether the effects are dependent on the extensiveness of the ablation applications.
A total of 42 patients underwent an echocardiographic examination prior to and 6 months after a minimal invasive epicardial pulmonary vein isolation procedure for the assessment of the effects on left atrial size and function. In 27 patients, who had sinus rhythm both at baseline and follow-up, was a comparison of atrial size and function possible at these time intervals. Fractional area changes were obtained from the left atrial end-systolic and end-diastolic areas in the apical four-chamber view. Pulsed-Doppler was used to assess the transmitral flow velocities to evaluate mechanical function.
Left atrial size and function at 6-month follow-up had not changed significantly from those at baseline as indicated by left atrial maximal area (17.1 ± 4.6 vs. 18.7 ± 5.3, p = 0.118), minimal area (12.5 ± 3.8 vs. 13.4 ± 4.7, p = 0.248), fractional area change (27.4 ± 8.2 vs. 28.7 ± 10.6, p = 0.670), and E/A ratio (1.49 ± 0.47 vs. 1.54 ± 0.67, p = 0.855).
Radiofrequency ablation for epicardial pulmonary vein isolation combined with ganglionated plexi ablation has no major effects on atrial function or size. A preserved atrial function for those maintaining sinus rhythm may have important implications for thromboembolic risk after surgery, but warrants confirmation in larger trials.
心外膜肺静脉隔离术已越来越多地用于治疗药物难治性心房颤动。因此,本研究的目的是评估心外膜肺静脉隔离术联合神经节丛消融是否会影响左心房的大小和机械功能,以及这些影响是否取决于消融应用的范围。
共有42例患者在接受微创心外膜肺静脉隔离术前和术后6个月接受超声心动图检查,以评估对左心房大小和功能的影响。在27例基线和随访时均为窦性心律的患者中,可以在这些时间间隔对心房大小和功能进行比较。从心尖四腔视图中的左心房收缩末期和舒张末期面积获得面积分数变化。使用脉冲多普勒评估二尖瓣血流速度以评估机械功能。
6个月随访时的左心房大小和功能与基线时相比无显著变化,如左心房最大面积(17.1±4.6对18.7±5.3,p = 0.118)、最小面积(12.5±3.8对13.4±4.7,p = 0.248)、面积分数变化(27.4±8.2对28.7±10.6,p = 0.670)和E/A比值(1.49±0.47对1.54±0.67,p = 0.855)所示。
心外膜肺静脉隔离术联合神经节丛消融的射频消融对心房功能或大小无重大影响。对于维持窦性心律的患者,保留心房功能可能对术后血栓栓塞风险具有重要意义,但需要在更大规模的试验中得到证实。