Kafil Tahir S, Nguyen Tran M, Patton Petrease H, MacDonald John K, Chande Nilesh, McDonald John Wd
Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 11;11(11):CD003575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003575.pub6.
Collagenous colitis is a cause of chronic diarrhea. This updated review was performed to identify therapies for collagenous colitis that have been assessed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
The primary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of treatments for collagenous colitis.
We searched CENTRAL, the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register, MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to 7 November 2016.
We included RCTs comparing a therapy with placebo or active comparator for the treatment of active or quiescent collagenous colitis.
Data were independently extracted by two authors. The primary outcome was clinical response or maintenance of response as defined by the included studies. Secondary outcome measures included histological response, quality of life and the occurrence of adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess bias. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
Twelve RCTs (476 participants) were included. These studies assessed bismuth subsalicylate, Boswellia serrata extract, mesalamine, cholestyramine, probiotics, prednisolone and budesonide therapy. Four studies were low risk of bias. One study assessing mesalamine and cholestyramine was judged to be high risk of bias due to no blinding. The other studies had an unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation (five studies) allocation concealment (six studies), blinding (one study), incomplete outcome data (one study) and selective outcome reporting (one study). Clinical response occurred in 100% (4/4) of patients who received bismuth subsalicylate (nine 262 mg tablets daily for 8 weeks) compared to 0% (0/5) of patients who received placebo (1 study; 9 participants; RR 10.80, 95% CI 0.75 to 155.93; GRADE = very low). Clinical response occurred in 44% (7/16) of patients who received Boswellia serrata extract (three 400 mg/day capsules for 8 weeks) compared to 27% (4/15) of patients who received placebo (1 study; 31 participants; RR 1.64, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.49; GRADE = low). Clinical response occurred in 80% (24/30) of budesonide patients compared to 44% (11/25) of mesalamine patients (1 study; 55 participants; RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.93; GRADE = low). Histological response was observed in 87% (26/30) of budesonide patients compared to 44% (11/25) of mesalamine patients (1 study, 55 participants; RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.13; GRADE = low). There was no difference between the two treatments with respect to adverse events (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.10; GRADE = low), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.65; GRADE = low) and serious adverse events (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.21; GRADE = low). Clinical response occurred in 44% (11/25) of mesalamine patients (3 g/day) compared to 59% (22/37) of placebo patients (1 study; 62 participants; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.24; GRADE = low). Histological response was observed in 44% (11/25) and 51% (19/37) of patients receiving mesalamine and placebo, respectively (1 study; 62 participants; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.47; GRADE = low). There was no difference between the two treatments with respect to adverse events (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.88; GRADE = low), withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 5.92, 95% CI 0.70 to 49.90; GRADE = low) and serious adverse events (RR 4.44, 95% CI 0.49 to 40.29; GRADE = low). Clinical response occurred in 63% (5/8) of prednisolone (50 mg/day for 2 weeks) patients compared to 0% (0/3) of placebo patients (1 study, 11 participants; RR 4.89, 95% CI 0.35 to 68.83; GRADE = very low). Clinical response occurred in 29% (6/21) of patients who received probiotics (2 capsules containing 0.5 x 10 CFU each of L. acidophilus LA-5 and B. animalis subsp. lactis strain BB-12 twice daily for 12 weeks) compared to 13% (1/8) of placebo patients (1 study, 29 participants, RR 2.29, 95% CI 0.32 to 16.13; GRADE = very low). Clinical response occurred in 73% (8/11) of patients who received mesalamine (800 mg three times daily) compared to 100% (12/12) of patients who received mesalamine + cholestyramine (4 g daily) (1 study, 23 participants; RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.08; GRADE = very low). Clinical response occurred in 81% (38/47) of patients who received budesonide (9 mg daily in a tapering schedule for 6 to 8 weeks) compared to 17% (8/47) of placebo patients (3 studies; 94 participants; RR 4.56, 95% CI 2.43 to 8.55; GRADE = low). Histological response was higher in budesonide participants (72%, 34/47) compared to placebo (17%, 8/47) (RR 4.15, 95% CI 2.25 to 7.66; GRADE = low). Clinical response was maintained in 68% (57/84) of budesonide patients compared to 20% (18/88) of placebo patients (3 studies, 172 participants, RR 3.30 95% CI 2.13 to 5.09; GRADE = low). Histological response was maintained in 48% (19/40) of budesonide patients compared to 15% (6/40) of placebo patients (2 studies; 80 participants; RR 3.17, 95% CI 1.44 to 6.95; GRADE = very low). No difference was found between budesonide and placebo for adverse events (5 studies; 290 participants; RR 1.18, o95% CI 0.92 to 1.51; GRADE = low), withdrawals due to adverse events (5 studies, 290 participants; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.17; GRADE = very low) or serious adverse events (4 studies, 175 participants; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.15 to 8.01; GRADE = very low). Adverse effects reported in the budesonide studies include nausea, vomiting, neck pain, abdominal pain, excessive sweating and headache. Adverse effects reported in the mesalamine studies included nausea and skin rash. Adverse effects in the prednisolone study included abdominal pain, headache, sleep disturbance, mood change and weight gain.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low quality evidence suggests that budesonide may be effective for inducing and maintaining clinical and histological response in patients with collagenous colitis. We are uncertain about the benefits and harms of therapy with bismuth subsalicylate, Boswellia serrata extract, mesalamine with or without cholestramine, prednisolone and probiotics. These agents and other therapies require further study.
胶原性结肠炎是慢性腹泻的一个病因。本更新综述旨在确定在随机对照试验(RCT)中评估过的用于治疗胶原性结肠炎的疗法。
主要目的是评估治疗胶原性结肠炎的益处和危害。
我们检索了截至2016年11月7日的Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane炎症性肠病小组专业注册库、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)和荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)。
我们纳入了比较一种疗法与安慰剂或活性对照药治疗活动期或静止期胶原性结肠炎的随机对照试验。
由两位作者独立提取数据。主要结局是纳入研究定义的临床缓解或缓解维持情况。次要结局指标包括组织学缓解、生活质量和不良事件的发生情况。对二分法结局计算风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚。采用GRADE标准评估证据的整体质量。
纳入了12项随机对照试验(476名参与者)。这些研究评估了次水杨酸铋、锯叶棕提取物、美沙拉嗪、考来烯胺、益生菌、泼尼松龙和布地奈德疗法。四项研究偏倚风险低。一项评估美沙拉嗪和考来烯胺的研究因未实施盲法被判定为高偏倚风险。其他研究在随机序列产生(5项研究)、分配隐藏(6项研究)、盲法(1项研究)、结局数据不完整(1项研究)和选择性报告结局(1项研究)方面的偏倚风险不明确。接受次水杨酸铋(每日9片262mg,共8周)的患者临床缓解率为100%(4/4),而接受安慰剂的患者为0%(0/5)(1项研究;9名参与者;RR 10.80,95%CI 0.75至155.93;GRADE = 极低)。接受锯叶棕提取物(每日3粒400mg胶囊,共8周)的患者临床缓解率为44%(7/16),接受安慰剂的患者为27%(4/15)(1项研究;31名参与者;RR 1.64,95%CI 0.60至4.49;GRADE = 低)。布地奈德组患者临床缓解率为80%(24/30),美沙拉嗪组为44%(11/25)(1项研究;55名参与者;RR 1.82,95%CI 1.13至2.93;GRADE = 低)。布地奈德组患者组织学缓解率为87%(26/30),美沙拉嗪组为44%(11/25)(1项研究,55名参与者;RR 1.97,95%CI 1.24至3.13;GRADE = 低)。两种治疗在不良事件(RR 0.69,95%CI 0.43至1.10;GRADE = 低)、因不良事件退出(RR 0.09,95%CI 0.01至1.65;GRADE = 低)和严重不良事件(RR 0.12,95%CI 0.01至2.21;GRADE = 低)方面无差异。接受美沙拉嗪(每日3g)的患者临床缓解率为44%(11/25),接受安慰剂的患者为59%(22/37)(1项研究;62名参与者;RR 0.74,95%CI 0.44至1.24;GRADE = 低)。接受美沙拉嗪和安慰剂的患者组织学缓解率分别为44%(11/25)和51%(19/37)(1项研究;62名参与者;RR 0.86,95%CI 0.50至1.47;GRADE = 低)。两种治疗在不良事件(RR 1.26,95%CI 0.84至1.88;GRADE = 低)、因不良事件退出(RR 5.92,95%CI 0.70至49.90;GRADE = 低)和严重不良事件(RR 4.44,95%CI 0.49至40.29;GRADE = 低)方面无差异。接受泼尼松龙(每日50mg,共2周)的患者临床缓解率为63%(5/8),接受安慰剂的患者为0%(0/3)(1项研究,11名参与者;RR 4.89,95%CI 0.35至68.83;GRADE = 极低)。接受益生菌(含嗜酸乳杆菌LA - 5和动物双歧杆菌亚种乳酸亚种菌株BB - 12各0.5×10⁸CFU的胶囊,每日2次,共12周)的患者临床缓解率为29%(6/21),接受安慰剂的患者为13%(1/8)(1项研究,29名参与者,RR 2.29,95%CI 0.32至16.13;GRADE = 极低)。接受美沙拉嗪(每日3次,每次800mg)的患者临床缓解率为73%(8/11),接受美沙拉嗪 + 考来烯胺(每日4g)的患者为100%(12/12)(1项研究,23名参与者;RR 0.74,95%CI 0.50至1.08;GRADE = 极低)。接受布地奈德(每日9mg,逐渐减量,共6至8周)的患者临床缓解率为81%(38/47),接受安慰剂的患者为17%(8/47)(3项研究;94名参与者;RR 4.56,95%CI 2.43至8.55;GRADE = 低)。布地奈德组参与者的组织学缓解率(72%,34/47)高于安慰剂组(17%,8/47)(RR 4.15,95%CI 2.25至7.66;GRADE = 低)。布地奈德组患者临床缓解维持率为68%(57/84),安慰剂组为20%(18/88)(3项研究,172名参与者,RR 3.30,95%CI 2.13至5.09;GRADE = 低)。布地奈德组患者组织学缓解维持率为48%(19/40),安慰剂组为15%(6/40)(2项研究;80名参与者;RR 3.17,95%CI 1.44至6.95;GRADE = 极低)。布地奈德与安慰剂在不良事件(5项研究;290名参与者;RR 1.18,95%CI 0.92至1.51;GRADE = 低)、因不良事件退出(5项研究,290名参与者;RR 0.97,95%CI 0.43至2.17;GRADE = 极低)或严重不良事件(4项研究,175名参与者;RR 1.11,95%CI 0.15至8.01;GRADE = 极低)方面无差异。布地奈德研究中报告的不良反应包括恶心、呕吐、颈部疼痛、腹痛、多汗和头痛。美沙拉嗪研究中报告的不良反应包括恶心和皮疹。泼尼松龙研究中的不良反应包括腹痛、头痛、睡眠障碍、情绪改变和体重增加。
低质量证据表明布地奈德可能对诱导和维持胶原性结肠炎患者的临床和组织学缓解有效。我们尚不确定次水杨酸铋、锯叶棕提取物、美沙拉嗪(含或不含考来烯胺)、泼尼松龙和益生菌治疗的益处和危害。这些药物及其他疗法需要进一步研究。