Krauss Gregory, Biton Victor, Harvey Jay H, Elger Christian, Trinka Eugen, Soares da Silva Patrício, Gama Helena, Cheng Hailong, Grinnell Todd, Blum David
The Johns Hopkins University, Department of Neurology, Meyer 2-147, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Arkansas Epilepsy Program, Clinical Trials Inc., 2 Lile Ct #100, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Epilepsy Res. 2018 Jan;139:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
To examine the influence of titration schedule and maintenance dose on the incidence and type of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) associated with adjunctive eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL).
Data from three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed. Patients with refractory partial-onset seizures were randomized to maintenance doses of ESL 400, 800, or 1200mg QD (dosing was initiated at 400 or 800mg QD) or placebo. The incidence of TEAEs was analyzed during the double-blind period (2-week titration phase; 12-week maintenance phase), according to the randomized maintenance dose and the titration schedule.
1447 patients were included in the analysis. During the first week of treatment, 62% of patients taking ESL 800mg QD had ≥1 TEAE, vs 35% of those taking 400mg QD and 32% of the placebo group; dizziness, somnolence, nausea, and headache were numerically more frequent in patients taking ESL 800mg than those taking ESL 400mg QD. During the double-blind period, the incidences of common TEAEs were lower in patients who initiated ESL at 400mg vs 800mg QD. For the 800 and 1200mg QD maintenance doses, rates of TEAEs leading to discontinuation were lower in patients who began treatment with 400mg than in those who began taking ESL 800mg QD.
Initiation of ESL at 800mg QD is feasible. However, initiating treatment with ESL 400mg QD for 1 or 2 weeks is recommended, being associated with a lower incidence of TEAEs, and related discontinuations. For some patients, treatment may be initiated at 800mg QD, if the need for more immediate seizure reduction outweighs concerns about increased risk of adverse reactions during initiation.
探讨滴定方案和维持剂量对与辅助用醋酸艾司利卡西平(ESL)相关的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)的发生率及类型的影响。
分析了三项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的数据。难治性部分性发作患者被随机分配至ESL维持剂量400、800或1200mg每日一次(起始剂量为400或800mg每日一次)或安慰剂组。根据随机分配的维持剂量和滴定方案,在双盲期(2周滴定阶段;12周维持阶段)分析TEAE的发生率。
1447例患者纳入分析。在治疗的第一周,服用ESL 800mg每日一次的患者中有62%发生≥1次TEAE,而服用400mg每日一次的患者为35%,安慰剂组为32%;服用ESL 800mg的患者中头晕、嗜睡、恶心和头痛在数量上比服用ESL 400mg每日一次的患者更常见。在双盲期,起始ESL剂量为400mg每日一次的患者中常见TEAE的发生率低于800mg每日一次的患者。对于800和1200mg每日一次的维持剂量,起始治疗剂量为400mg的患者中导致停药的TEAE发生率低于起始服用ESL 800mg每日一次的患者。
起始ESL剂量为800mg每日一次是可行的。然而,建议以ESL 400mg每日一次起始治疗1或2周,其与较低的TEAE发生率及相关停药率有关。对于一些患者,如果更迫切需要减少癫痫发作的需求超过了对起始治疗期间不良反应风险增加的担忧,则可以800mg每日一次起始治疗。