Department of Vascular Surgery, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
J Hosp Infect. 2018 May;99(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.10.022. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
Approximately 19% of morbidity in peripheral vascular surgery is attributable to wound complications, which can result in delayed healing, and also arterial or graft infection leading to limb loss and even mortality in extreme cases.
To determine whether groin wound complications were reduced following the routine introduction of PICO negative pressure wound therapy dressings in patients who underwent peripheral vascular surgery.
Patients who underwent peripheral vascular surgery from 2011 to 2016 were identified and divided into PICO and non-PICO groups. Patient, procedure and wound characteristics were tabulated and analysed. Patients were followed-up for at least six weeks postoperatively. Wound complication rates, infection confirmed by microbiology, and requirement for re-admission due to wound complications were noted. Basic cost analysis was performed.
In total, 151 patients were analysed (N = 73 PICO, N = 78 non-PICO). No difference in age (P = 0.862), body mass index (P = 0.673), diabetes (P = 0.339), pre-operative albumin (P = 0.196), use of drain (P = 0.343) and history of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (P = 0.281) was observed between groups. The PICO group contained more smokers than the non-PICO group (45% vs 29%, P = 0.034). Wound complications were seen in 8% (N = 6) of the PICO group and 19% (N = 15) of the non-PICO group (P = 0.042). No significant difference in infection was found between the two groups (3% vs 6%, P = 0.249), but fewer seromas were observed when PICO dressings were used (1.4% vs 7.7%, P = 0.069). Haematoma (2.7% vs 3.8%, P = 0.531) and dehiscence rates (1.4% vs 1.3%, P = 0.735) were similar between the two groups.
Routine use of PICO dressings is associated with a reduction in wound complication rates following peripheral vascular surgery, and is cost-effective.
外周血管手术的发病率约有 19%归因于伤口并发症,这可能导致愈合延迟,还会导致动脉或移植物感染,在极端情况下导致肢体丧失甚至死亡。
确定在常规使用 PICO 负压伤口治疗敷料后,外周血管手术患者的腹股沟伤口并发症是否减少。
确定了 2011 年至 2016 年期间接受外周血管手术的患者,并将其分为 PICO 和非 PICO 组。对患者、手术和伤口特征进行了列表和分析。对患者进行了至少六周的术后随访。记录伤口并发症发生率、微生物学确认的感染以及因伤口并发症再次入院的情况。进行了基本成本分析。
共分析了 151 例患者(N=73 PICO,N=78 非 PICO)。两组患者的年龄(P=0.862)、体重指数(P=0.673)、糖尿病(P=0.339)、术前白蛋白(P=0.196)、引流管使用(P=0.343)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌史(P=0.281)无差异。PICO 组吸烟者多于非 PICO 组(45%比 29%,P=0.034)。PICO 组有 8%(N=6)的患者发生伤口并发症,而非 PICO 组有 19%(N=15)的患者发生伤口并发症(P=0.042)。两组之间的感染无显著差异(3%比 6%,P=0.249),但使用 PICO 敷料时观察到的血清肿较少(1.4%比 7.7%,P=0.069)。血肿(2.7%比 3.8%,P=0.531)和裂开率(1.4%比 1.3%,P=0.735)在两组之间相似。
常规使用 PICO 敷料可降低外周血管手术后的伤口并发症发生率,且具有成本效益。