Domos Peter, Tytherleigh-Strong Graham, Van Rensburg Lee
1 Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
2 Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Sep-Dec;25(3):2309499017739482. doi: 10.1177/2309499017739482.
Adult mid-shaft clavicle fractures are common injuries. For displaced fractures, open reduction with plate or intramedullary (IM) fixation is the widely used techniques. All methods have their own potential drawbacks, especially related to local soft tissue complications. There is little information about outcome and management of local wound complications after clavicle fracture fixations.
Ninety-seven patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation, 17 were treated with IM screw fixation and 80 with plate fixation. Wound complication occurred in eight patients (8.2%) and rates differed significantly between IM and plate fixations (29.4% vs. 3.8%). Patients were assessed on average 58.3 months with visual analogue pain scores (VASs), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and QuickDash (QD) score.
Five patients had wound breakdown and three patients had wound erythema. In seven patients with stable fixation, it was possible to "dress and suppress" with average 3 weeks of oral antibiotics. One patient had unstable fixation and required longer antibiotic treatment with early screw removal. One patient developed a chronic discharging wound, requiring debridement and later plate removal. At final follow-up, all wounds remained healed, bony union was achieved in all. The average scores were: VAS 1, OSS 46, and QD 4.5.
Good function with dry healed wound and united clavicle can be achieved. Further studies are required to investigate the difference in soft tissue complication rates, which may be due to the IM technique of retrograde drilling with a guide wire and due to aseptic thermal bone necrosis, rather than true infection.
成人锁骨中段骨折是常见损伤。对于移位骨折,切开复位钢板或髓内(IM)固定是广泛应用的技术。所有方法都有其潜在缺点,尤其是与局部软组织并发症相关。关于锁骨骨折固定后局部伤口并发症的结局和处理的信息很少。
97例患者接受切开复位内固定,17例采用IM螺钉固定,80例采用钢板固定。8例患者(8.2%)发生伤口并发症,IM固定和钢板固定的发生率有显著差异(29.4%对3.8%)。平均58.3个月时采用视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)、牛津肩评分(OSS)和快速残疾评定量表(QD)对患者进行评估。
5例患者伤口裂开,3例患者伤口红斑。7例固定稳定的患者口服抗生素平均3周后得以“换药并控制”。1例患者固定不稳定,需要更长时间的抗生素治疗并早期取出螺钉。1例患者出现慢性流脓伤口,需要清创,后来取出钢板。末次随访时,所有伤口均愈合,所有患者均实现骨愈合。平均评分如下:VAS为1分,OSS为46分,QD为4.5分。
可实现伤口干燥愈合且锁骨愈合的良好功能。需要进一步研究来调查软组织并发症发生率的差异,这可能是由于带导丝逆行钻孔的IM技术以及无菌性热骨坏死,而非真正的感染。