Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):118-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
To investigate the effectiveness of graduated elastic compression stockings (GECS) below the knee in improving symptoms in patients with varicose veins in the absence of high quality evidence.
This was a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. Thirty patients with no experience of elastic stockings, presenting with primary varicose veins causing calf pain or aching were randomised to a GECS (18-21 mmHg at the ankle level, n=15) or a placebo stocking (0 mmHg, n=15). Pain or aching of the index leg after 1 week was the primary outcome measure. In patients with bilateral varicose veins the leg with the most severe pain/aching was considered. Other defined symptoms were secondary outcome measures. All symptoms were scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS).
The two study groups were well balanced at baseline. At the completion of the study after 1 week, GECS were more effective than placebo stockings in reducing pain or aching (VAS score 1.7±3.0 vs. 4.5±2.8 for placebo, p=.02), while non-significant trends were observed for some of the remaining symptoms of the index leg, including feeling of swelling (VAS score 0.9±1.9 vs. 3.3±3.5 for placebo), paraesthesiae (VAS score 0.2±0.6 vs. 2.1±3.1 for placebo), and the number of symptoms other than pain or aching (1.3±1.1 vs. 2.8±1.7 for placebo). Number needed to treat (95% CI) for a 50% or complete improvement of pain or aching in the index leg was 2 (95% CI 1.2-5.5) and 2 (95% CI 1.2-5.3), respectively. Mean daily use of the placebo stockings and GECS was 8.0 hours and 10.2 hours, respectively (p=.13).
Among patients with varicose veins, GECS seem effective in ameliorating symptoms, particularly pain or aching, compared with placebo stockings after 1 week of use. Long-term studies are justified.
在缺乏高质量证据的情况下,研究膝下分级弹力压缩袜(GECS)对改善静脉曲张患者症状的效果。
这是一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。30 名从未使用过弹力袜、因小腿疼痛或不适而出现原发性静脉曲张的患者被随机分配至 GECS(踝部 18-21mmHg,n=15)或安慰剂袜(0mmHg,n=15)。以第 1 周时患侧腿部疼痛或不适的程度作为主要结局指标。对于双侧静脉曲张的患者,以疼痛或不适最严重的腿为准。其他定义的症状为次要结局指标。所有症状均采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评分。
两组患者在基线时具有良好的均衡性。在 1 周后的研究结束时,GECS 在减轻疼痛或不适方面比安慰剂袜更有效(VAS 评分 1.7±3.0 对 4.5±2.8,p=.02),而其余一些腿部症状(包括肿胀感、感觉异常和除疼痛或不适以外的症状数)的改善趋势虽不显著,但也有观察到(VAS 评分 0.9±1.9 对 3.3±3.5,0.2±0.6 对 2.1±3.1,1.3±1.1 对 2.8±1.7)。对于指数腿疼痛或不适 50%或完全改善的治疗人数(95%CI),GECS 为 2(95%CI 1.2-5.5),安慰剂为 2(95%CI 1.2-5.3)。安慰剂袜和 GECS 的平均每日使用时间分别为 8.0 小时和 10.2 小时(p=.13)。
在静脉曲张患者中,与安慰剂袜相比,GECS 在使用 1 周后似乎可有效改善症状,尤其是疼痛或不适。需要进行长期研究。