• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旋转铰链植入物在复杂初次和翻修全膝关节置换术中的应用。

Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):766-770. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.009
PMID:29129618
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contemporary rotating hinge knee (RHK) prosthesis has shown improved survival rates over earlier generations. However, reports of high complication and mechanical failure rates highlight the need for more clinical outcome data in the complex primary and revision setting. The purpose of this study is to report our results of using a contemporary rotating hinge for complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Using a prospectively maintained surgical database, 79 knees in 76 patients who underwent an RHK of a single design for either a complex primary (14 knees) or revision total knee arthroplasty (65 knees) were identified. This included 19% undergoing an RHK for periprosthetic joint infection and 32.9% who had concomitant extensor mechanism repair. The cohort consisted of 60 women and 16 men with a mean age of 66.7 years (range 39-89) at the time of surgery. Patient outcomes were assessed using Knee Society Scores and radiographs were reviewed for signs of wear and loosening. Failure rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

At a minimum of 2 years, 13 patients had died and 4 were lost to follow-up, leaving 62 knees in 59 patients who were followed for a mean of 55.2 months (range 24-146). The mean Knee Society Scores improved from 35.7 to 66.2 points (P < .01). The incidence of complications was 38.7%. The most common complications were periprosthetic fracture, extensor mechanism rupture, and periprosthetic infection. Estimated survival was 70.7% at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Despite improvements in design and biomaterials, there remains a relatively high complication rate associated with the use of a modern RHK implant. While aseptic loosening was rare, periprosthetic fracture, infection, and extensor mechanism failure were substantial emphasizing the complex nature of these cases.

摘要

背景

与早期几代产品相比,现代旋转铰链膝关节(RHK)假体的存活率有所提高。然而,高并发症和机械故障发生率的报告突显了在复杂的初次和翻修环境中需要更多临床结果数据。本研究的目的是报告我们使用现代旋转铰链进行复杂初次和翻修全膝关节置换术的结果。

方法

使用前瞻性维护的手术数据库,确定了 76 名患者的 79 膝接受了单一设计的 RHK,其中 14 膝为复杂初次置换,65 膝为翻修全膝关节置换。这包括 19%的患者因假体周围关节感染而行 RHK,32.9%的患者同时行伸肌机制修复。该队列包括 60 名女性和 16 名男性,手术时的平均年龄为 66.7 岁(范围 39-89)。使用膝关节协会评分评估患者的结果,并对影像学进行检查以观察磨损和松动的迹象。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线估计失败率。

结果

至少随访 2 年时,有 13 名患者死亡,4 名患者失访,59 名患者中有 62 膝随访,平均随访时间为 55.2 个月(范围 24-146)。膝关节协会评分从 35.7 分提高到 66.2 分(P<0.01)。并发症发生率为 38.7%。最常见的并发症是假体周围骨折、伸肌机制破裂和假体周围感染。估计 5 年生存率为 70.7%。

结论

尽管设计和生物材料有所改进,但现代 RHK 植入物的使用仍存在相对较高的并发症发生率。虽然无菌性松动罕见,但假体周围骨折、感染和伸肌机制失败较为严重,强调了这些病例的复杂性。

相似文献

1
Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.旋转铰链植入物在复杂初次和翻修全膝关节置换术中的应用。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):766-770. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
2
Long-Term Results After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.使用当代旋转铰链假体进行全膝关节置换术后的长期结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Feb 15;99(4):324-330. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00307.
3
What Is the Mid-term Survivorship of Infected Rotating-hinge Implants Treated with One-stage-exchange?感染的旋转铰链植入物一期翻修术后的中期存活率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2714-2722. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001868.
4
Rotating-hinge prosthesis for aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: A multicentre retrospective study of 127 cases with a mean follow-up of five years.旋转铰链假体在膝关节无菌性翻修中的应用:127 例平均随访 5 年的多中心回顾性研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102855. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102855. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
5
Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior stabilized, condylar constrained or fully constrained prosthesis: a minimum 2-year follow-up analysis.翻修全膝关节置换术,使用骨水泥固定的后稳定、髁间限制或完全限制假体:至少 2 年的随访分析。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Jun;2(2):112-20. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.2.112. Epub 2010 May 4.
6
Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes.复杂初次全膝关节置换术:长期疗效
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):1459-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01173.
7
Is there a place for rotating-hinge arthroplasty in knee revision surgery for aseptic loosening?在无菌性松动的膝关节翻修手术中,旋转铰链式人工关节置换术是否有一席之地?
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Dec;23(8):1204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.016. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
8
Acceptable mid- to long-term survival rates and functional outcomes following a single design rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty.单设计旋转铰链式全膝关节置换术后可接受的中期至长期生存率和功能结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun;28(6):1868-1875. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05593-1. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
Outcomes of rotating versus pure hinge knee arthroplasty in the setting of one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection.一期翻修治疗人工关节周围感染中旋转铰链膝关节置换与单纯铰链膝关节置换的结果比较。
Int Orthop. 2024 Jul;48(7):1751-1759. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06139-y. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
10
Hinged versus CCK revision arthroplasty for the stiff total knee.用于僵硬全膝关节的铰链式与CCK翻修关节成形术
Knee. 2019 Jan;26(1):222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Two- to Six-year Assessment of Survivorship and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rotating Hinge Knee Prostheses With Porous Tibial Cone Augmentation.带多孔胫骨锥形增强旋转铰链膝关节假体的2至6年生存率及患者报告结局评估
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jun 2;33:101724. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101724. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Clinical outcomes of standard primary vs. primary rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective matched-pair analysis.标准初次全膝关节置换术与初次旋转铰链式全膝关节置换术的临床疗效:一项回顾性配对分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jun 7;20(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05961-3.
3
Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty: Rotating hinge prostheses.
全膝关节置换术的当前概念:旋转铰链式假体
SICOT J. 2025;11:18. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2025010. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
4
Total knee replacement in severe genu recurvatum. High prosthetic survival rate without deformity recurrence, using rotating hinge prosthesis.重度膝反屈的全膝关节置换术。使用旋转铰链式假体,假体生存率高且无畸形复发。
J Orthop. 2024 Oct 9;61:109-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.008. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Survivorship and Functional Outcomes After Complex Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty With Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Implants.采用当代旋转铰链型植入物的复杂初次全膝关节置换术后的生存率和功能结果
HSS J. 2024 Sep 19:15563316241276869. doi: 10.1177/15563316241276869.
6
Assessing the impact of distal femoral morphology using Citak's ratio: an independent risk factor for aseptic loosening in rotating hinge knee prosthesis.使用 Citak 比值评估股骨远端形态的影响:旋转铰链膝关节假体无菌性松动的独立危险因素。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3573-3581. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05427-x. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
7
Outcomes of rotating versus pure hinge knee arthroplasty in the setting of one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection.一期翻修治疗人工关节周围感染中旋转铰链膝关节置换与单纯铰链膝关节置换的结果比较。
Int Orthop. 2024 Jul;48(7):1751-1759. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06139-y. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Comparative Functional and Isokinetic Analysis between Implants with Posterior Stabilization and Rotating Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty.后稳定型植入物与旋转铰链型全膝关节置换术的比较功能及等速分析
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 Mar 21;59(1):e68-e75. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779685. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Midterm results of modular hinge total knee arthroplasty using cementless osseointegrating stems: low fixation associated complications and good functional outcome in primary and revision knee arthroplasty.使用非骨水泥骨整合柄的模块化铰链式全膝关节置换术的中期结果:在初次和翻修膝关节置换术中,低固定相关并发症和良好的功能结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):831-845. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05148-7. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
10
Good Mid-Term Implant Survival of a Novel Single-Design Rotating-Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty.新型单设计旋转铰链全膝关节置换术的中期植入物良好存活率
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6113. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196113.