Shin Su Jin, Kim Yeong Kyeong, Suh Soon-Rim, Jung Duk Yoo, Kim Yunju, Yim Mi Kyoung
College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
College of Nursing, Catholic University of Pusan, Korea.
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Oct 25;14:26. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.26. eCollection 2017.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze opinions about the action plan for implementation of clinical performance exam as part of the national nursing licensing examination and presents the expected effects of the performance exam and aspects to consider regarding its implementation. METHODS: This study used a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected by a questionnaire survey, while qualitative data were collected by focus group interviews with experts. The survey targeted 200 nursing professors and clinical nurses with more than 5 years of work experience, and the focus group interviews were conducted with 28 of professors, clinical instructors, and nurses at hospitals. RESULTS: First, nursing professors and clinical specialists agreed that the current written tests have limitations in evaluating examinees' ability, and that the introduction of a clinical performance exam will yield positive results. Clinical performance exam is necessary to evaluate and improve nurses' work ability, which means that the implementation of a performance exam is advisable if its credibility and validity can be verified. Second, most respondents chose direct performance exams using simulators or standardized patients as the most suitable format of the test. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the current national nursing licensing exam is somewhat limited in its ability to identify competent nurses. Thus, the time has come for us to seriously consider the introduction of a performance exam. The prerequisites for successfully implementing clinical performance exam as part of the national nursing licensing exam are a professional training process and forming a consortium to standardize practical training.
目的:本研究旨在分析作为国家护士执照考试一部分的临床实践考试实施行动计划的相关意见,并呈现实践考试的预期效果及其实施时需考虑的方面。 方法:本研究采用混合方法设计。定量数据通过问卷调查收集,定性数据通过与专家进行焦点小组访谈收集。调查对象为200名护理教授和具有5年以上工作经验的临床护士,焦点小组访谈则由28名教授、临床教师和医院护士参与。 结果:首先,护理教授和临床专家一致认为当前的笔试在评估考生能力方面存在局限性,引入临床实践考试将产生积极效果。临床实践考试对于评估和提高护士的工作能力是必要的,这意味着如果其可信度和有效性能够得到验证,那么实施实践考试是可取的。其次,大多数受访者选择使用模拟器或标准化病人进行直接实践考试作为最合适的考试形式。 结论:总之,当前的国家护士执照考试在识别合格护士的能力方面存在一定局限性。因此,现在是我们认真考虑引入实践考试的时候了。将临床实践考试成功纳入国家护士执照考试的前提条件是专业培训过程以及组建一个联盟以规范实践培训。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017-10-25
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016-6-7
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016-6-2
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2020