Suppr超能文献

利伐沙班联合或不联合阿司匹林用于稳定性冠心病患者:一项国际、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Rivaroxaban with or without aspirin in patients with stable coronary artery disease: an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):205-218. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32458-3. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is a consequence of acute thrombotic events involving activation of platelets and coagulation proteins. Factor Xa inhibitors and aspirin each reduce thrombotic events but have not yet been tested in combination or against each other in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, outpatient trial, patients with stable coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease were recruited at 602 hospitals, clinics, or community centres in 33 countries. This paper reports on patients with coronary artery disease. Eligible patients with coronary artery disease had to have had a myocardial infarction in the past 20 years, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, history of stable or unstable angina, previous multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention, or previous multi-vessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After a 30-day run in period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive rivaroxaban (2·5 mg orally twice a day) plus aspirin (100 mg once a day), rivaroxaban alone (5 mg orally twice a day), or aspirin alone (100 mg orally once a day). Randomisation was computer generated. Each treatment group was double dummy, and the patients, investigators, and central study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome of the COMPASS trial was the occurrence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01776424, and is closed to new participants.

FINDINGS

Between March 12, 2013, and May 10, 2016, 27 395 patients were enrolled to the COMPASS trial, of whom 24 824 patients had stable coronary artery disease from 558 centres. The combination of rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced the primary outcome more than aspirin alone (347 [4%] of 8313 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; hazard ratio [HR] 0·74, 95% CI 0·65-0·86, p<0·0001). By comparison, treatment with rivaroxaban alone did not significantly improve the primary outcome when compared with treatment with aspirin alone (411 [5%] of 8250 vs 460 [6%] of 8261; HR 0·89, 95% CI 0·78-1·02, p=0·094). Combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin treatment resulted in more major bleeds than treatment with aspirin alone (263 [3%] of 8313 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·66, 95% CI 1·37-2·03, p<0·0001), and similarly, more bleeds were seen in the rivaroxaban alone group than in the aspirin alone group (236 [3%] of 8250 vs 158 [2%] of 8261; HR 1·51, 95% CI 1·23-1·84, p<0·0001). The most common site of major bleeding was gastrointestinal, occurring in 130 [2%] patients who received combined rivaroxaban plus aspirin, in 84 [1%] patients who received rivaroxaban alone, and in 61 [1%] patients who received aspirin alone. Rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced mortality when compared with aspirin alone (262 [3%] of 8313 vs 339 [4%] of 8261; HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·65-0·90, p=0·0012).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with stable coronary artery disease, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin lowered major vascular events, but increased major bleeding. There was no significant increase in intracranial bleeding or other critical organ bleeding. There was also a significant net benefit in favour of rivaroxaban plus aspirin and deaths were reduced by 23%. Thus, addition of rivaroxaban to aspirin has the potential to substantially reduce morbidity and mortality from coronary artery disease worldwide.

FUNDING

Bayer AG.

摘要

背景

冠心病是全世界发病率和死亡率的主要原因,是涉及血小板和凝血蛋白激活的急性血栓事件的后果。因子 Xa 抑制剂和阿司匹林均可减少血栓事件,但尚未在稳定型冠心病患者中联合或相互进行测试。

方法

在这项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、门诊试验中,在 33 个国家的 602 家医院、诊所或社区中心招募了患有稳定型冠心病或外周动脉疾病的患者。本文报告了患有冠心病的患者。患有冠心病的合格患者必须在过去 20 年内发生过心肌梗死、多血管性冠心病、稳定或不稳定型心绞痛病史、先前的多血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或先前的多血管冠状动脉旁路移植术。经过 30 天的洗脱期后,患者随机(1:1:1)接受利伐沙班(每天两次口服 2.5 毫克)加阿司匹林(每天一次口服 100 毫克)、利伐沙班(每天两次口服 5 毫克)或阿司匹林(每天一次口服 100 毫克)治疗。随机分配由计算机生成。每个治疗组均为双盲,患者、研究者和中心研究人员对治疗分配情况均不知情。COMPASS 试验的主要终点是心肌梗死、卒中和心血管死亡的发生。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01776424,现已对新参与者关闭。

结果

2013 年 3 月 12 日至 2016 年 5 月 10 日期间,共纳入 27395 例患者参加 COMPASS 试验,其中 558 个中心的 24824 例患者患有稳定型冠心病。利伐沙班加阿司匹林联合治疗较阿司匹林单药治疗降低主要终点事件的发生率更高(8313 例中的 347 例[4%]与 8261 例中的 460 例[6%];风险比[HR]0.74,95%CI0.65-0.86,p<0.0001)。相比之下,与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,利伐沙班单药治疗并未显著改善主要终点事件(8250 例中的 411 例[5%]与 8261 例中的 460 例[6%];HR0.89,95%CI0.78-1.02,p=0.094)。联合应用利伐沙班加阿司匹林治疗的大出血发生率高于阿司匹林单药治疗(8313 例中的 263 例[3%]与 8261 例中的 158 例[2%];HR1.66,95%CI1.37-2.03,p<0.0001),同样,利伐沙班单药治疗组的出血发生率也高于阿司匹林单药治疗组(8250 例中的 236 例[3%]与 8261 例中的 158 例[2%];HR1.51,95%CI1.23-1.84,p<0.0001)。最常见的大出血部位是胃肠道,在接受联合利伐沙班加阿司匹林治疗的 130 例患者(2%)、接受利伐沙班单药治疗的 84 例患者(1%)和接受阿司匹林单药治疗的 61 例患者(1%)中发生。与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,利伐沙班加阿司匹林降低了死亡率(8313 例中的 262 例[3%]与 8261 例中的 339 例[4%];HR0.77,95%CI0.65-0.90,p=0.0012)。

解释

在稳定型冠心病患者中,加用利伐沙班可降低主要血管事件,但增加大出血。颅内出血或其他重要器官出血没有明显增加。利伐沙班加阿司匹林治疗也有明显的净效益,死亡率降低了 23%。因此,加用利伐沙班可显著降低全球冠心病的发病率和死亡率。

经费来源

拜耳公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验