Dempsey B, Callaghan S, Higgins M F
Perinatal Research Centre, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Feb 2;11(2):e35481. doi: 10.2196/35481.
Despite being one of the most common gynecological procedures in the world, abortion care remains highly stigmatized. Internationally, providers have noted negative impacts related to their involvement in the services, and abortion care has been described as "dirty work." Though much of the existing research focuses on the challenges of providing, many have also highlighted the positive aspects of working in abortion care. Despite the steadily increasing interest in this area over the past decade, however, no one has sought to systematically review the literature to date.
The aim of this review is to systematically explore published studies on the experiences of abortion care providers to create a narrative review on the lived experience of providing abortion care, reflecting on what is already known and what areas require further exploration.
This review will be conducted according to the framework outlined by Levac et al, which expanded on the popular Arksey and O'Malley framework. We will systematically search for peer-reviewed articles in 6 electronic databases: CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Web of Science. Following a pilot exercise, we devised a search strategy to identify relevant studies. In this protocol, we outline how citations will be assessed for eligibility and what information will be extracted from the included articles. We also highlight how this information will be combined in the review.
As of December 2021, at the time of writing, we have searched for articles in the electronic databases and identified 6624 unique citations. We intend to fully assess these citations for eligibility by the end of January 2022, chart and analyze data from the eligible citations by the end of March 2022, and submit a journal article for peer review by late spring 2022.
The findings of this review will provide a comprehensive overview on the known experiences of providing abortion care. We also anticipate that the findings will identify aspects of care and experiences that are not reflected in the available literature. We will disseminate the results via a publication in a peer-reviewed academic journal and by presenting the findings at conferences in the areas of abortion care, obstetrics, and midwifery. As this review is a secondary analysis of published articles, ethical approval was not required.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35481.
尽管堕胎护理是世界上最常见的妇科手术之一,但它仍然受到高度污名化。在国际上,提供者已经注意到与他们参与这些服务相关的负面影响,堕胎护理被描述为“脏活”。虽然现有的许多研究都集中在提供堕胎护理的挑战上,但也有许多人强调了从事堕胎护理工作的积极方面。然而,尽管在过去十年中对这一领域的兴趣稳步增加,但迄今为止还没有人试图系统地回顾相关文献。
本综述的目的是系统地探索已发表的关于堕胎护理提供者经历的研究,以对提供堕胎护理的实际经历进行叙述性综述,反思已知的内容以及哪些领域需要进一步探索。
本综述将根据Levac等人概述的框架进行,该框架是在广受欢迎的Arksey和O'Malley框架的基础上扩展而来的。我们将系统地在6个电子数据库中搜索同行评审的文章:护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、考克兰图书馆、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycInfo)、医学期刊数据库(PubMed)和科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)。在进行了一次预试验后,我们设计了一种搜索策略来识别相关研究。在本方案中,我们概述了将如何评估引文的 eligibility以及将从纳入的文章中提取哪些信息。我们还强调了这些信息将如何在综述中进行整合。
截至2021年12月撰写本文时,我们已经在电子数据库中搜索了文章,并识别出6624条独特的引文。我们打算在2022年1月底前全面评估这些引文的eligibility,在2022年3月底前对符合条件的引文的数据进行图表绘制和分析,并在2022年春末提交一篇期刊文章供同行评审。
本综述的结果将提供关于提供堕胎护理的已知经历的全面概述。我们还预计,这些结果将识别出在现有文献中未得到体现的护理和经历方面。我们将通过在同行评审的学术期刊上发表以及在堕胎护理、产科学和助产学领域的会议上展示研究结果来传播这些结果。由于本综述是对已发表文章的二次分析,因此无需伦理批准。
国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/35481 。
原文中“eligibility”未明确给出中文释义,根据语境推测大概是指某种资格、合格性之类的意思,这里保留英文未翻译。