Schiff Rachel, Sasson Ayelet, Star Galit, Kahta Shani
Learning Disabilities Studies, School of Education, Bar Ilan University, 5290002, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Haddad Center for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities, Bar Ilan University, 5290002, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Ann Dyslexia. 2017 Oct;67(3):333-355. doi: 10.1007/s11881-017-0147-5. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
The importance of feedback for learning has been firmly established over the past few decades. The question of whether feedback plays a significant role in the statistical learning abilities of adults with dyslexia, however, is currently unresolved. Here, we examined the role of feedback in grammaticality judgment, type of structural knowledge, and confidence rating in both typically developed and dyslexic adults. We implemented two artificial grammar learning experiments: implicit and explicit. The second experiment was directly analogous to the first experiment in all respects except training format: the standard memorization instruction was replaced with an explicit rule-search instruction. Each experiment was conducted with and without performance feedback. While both groups showed significantly improved learning in the feedback-based explicit artificial grammar learning task, only the typically developed adults demonstrated higher levels of conscious structural knowledge. The present study demonstrates that the basis for the grammaticality judgment of adults with dyslexia differs from that of typically developed adults, regardless of increase in the level of explicitness.
在过去几十年里,反馈对学习的重要性已得到确凿证实。然而,反馈在阅读障碍成年患者的统计学习能力中是否发挥重要作用这一问题,目前尚无定论。在此,我们研究了反馈在语法性判断、结构知识类型以及正常发育成年人和阅读障碍成年人的信心评级中的作用。我们开展了两项人工语法学习实验:隐性实验和显性实验。第二项实验在所有方面都与第一项实验直接类似,只是训练形式不同:标准的记忆指令被明确的规则搜索指令所取代。每项实验都在有和没有表现反馈的情况下进行。虽然两组在基于反馈的显性人工语法学习任务中学习都有显著提高,但只有正常发育的成年人表现出更高水平的显性结构知识。本研究表明,无论明确程度如何提高,阅读障碍成年人的语法性判断依据与正常发育成年人不同。