• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖宫产术中操作技术与足月后续引产时子宫完全破裂风险。一项登记病例对照研究。

Operative technique at caesarean delivery and risk of complete uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labour at term. A registry case-control study.

作者信息

Thisted Dorthe L A, Mortensen Laust H, Hvidman Lone, Krebs Lone

机构信息

Fetal Medicine Unit. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaard Alle 30, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Methods and Analysis, Statistics Denmark, Sejeroegade 11, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187850. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187850
PMID:29136026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5685606/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the relation of single-layer closure at previous caesarean delivery, and other pre-labour and intra-partum risk factors for complete uterine rupture in trial of vaginal birth after a caesarean (TOLAC) at term.

STUDY DESIGN

Population-based case-control study. We identified all women (n = 39 742) recorded in the Danish Medical Birth Registry (DMBR) during a 12-year period (1997-2008) with a singleton pregnancy at term and TOLAC. Among these, all women with a complete uterine rupture were identified (cases). Information from the registry was validated against medical records. Controls were selected in the DMBR as the following two births with TOLAC at term and no uterine rupture. Detailed information from cases and controls was collected from manual review of medical records. Main outcome measure was complete uterine rupture during TOLAC at term.

RESULTS

Upon validation, 175 cases and 272 controls met the above criteria. After adjustment for possible confounding factors there was no association between single layer closure and uterine rupture (aOR 1.38, CI: 0.88-2.17). Significant risk factors were: Induction with an unfavourable cervix (aOR 2.10 CI: 1.19-3.71), epidural (aOR 2.17 CI 1.31-3.57), augmentation by oxytocin for more than one hour (aOR 2.03 CI: 1.20-3.44), and birth weight ≥ 4000g (aOR 2.65 CI 1.05-6.64). Previous vaginal delivery (aOR 0.41 CI: 0.25-0.68) and inter-delivery interval of more than 24 months (aOR 0.38 CI: 0.18-0.78) reduced the risk of uterine rupture.

CONCLUSION

Single-layer uterine closure did not remain significantly associated to uterine rupture during TOLAC at term after adjustment for confounding factors. Induction of labour with an unfavourable cervix, birth weight ≥ 4000g and indicators of prolonged labour were all major risk factors for uterine rupture.

摘要

目的

评估足月剖宫产术后经阴道分娩(TOLAC)时,前次剖宫产单层缝合与其他产前及产时子宫完全破裂风险因素之间的关系。

研究设计

基于人群的病例对照研究。我们确定了丹麦医疗出生登记处(DMBR)在12年期间(1997 - 2008年)记录的所有足月单胎妊娠且进行TOLAC的妇女(n = 39742)。其中,确定了所有发生子宫完全破裂的妇女(病例)。登记处的信息与病历进行了核对。在DMBR中选择对照为接下来两次足月进行TOLAC且未发生子宫破裂的分娩。通过人工查阅病历收集病例和对照的详细信息。主要结局指标是足月TOLAC期间子宫完全破裂。

结果

经核对,175例病例和272例对照符合上述标准。在对可能的混杂因素进行调整后,单层缝合与子宫破裂之间无关联(校正比值比[aOR]为1.38,可信区间[CI]:0.88 - 2.17)。显著的风险因素包括:宫颈条件不佳时引产(aOR 2.10,CI:1.19 - 3.71)、硬膜外麻醉(aOR 2.17,CI 1.31 - 3.57)、缩宫素引产超过1小时(aOR 2.03,CI:1.20 - 3.44)以及出生体重≥4000g(aOR 2.65,CI 1.05 - 6.64)。既往阴道分娩(aOR 0.41,CI:0.25 - 0.68)和两次分娩间隔超过24个月(aOR 0.38,CI:0.18 - 0.78)可降低子宫破裂风险。

结论

在对混杂因素进行调整后,足月TOLAC期间单层子宫缝合与子宫破裂之间无显著关联。宫颈条件不佳时引产、出生体重≥4000g以及产程延长的指标均是子宫破裂的主要风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292d/5685606/e9a70730b7ce/pone.0187850.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292d/5685606/e9a70730b7ce/pone.0187850.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292d/5685606/e9a70730b7ce/pone.0187850.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Operative technique at caesarean delivery and risk of complete uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labour at term. A registry case-control study.剖宫产术中操作技术与足月后续引产时子宫完全破裂风险。一项登记病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187850. eCollection 2017.
2
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).有剖宫产史产妇的分娩:法国妇产科医生学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
3
How does uterine contractile activity affect the success of trial of labour after caesarean section, and the risk of uterine rupture? An exploratory, blinded analysis of a cohort from a randomised controlled trial.子宫收缩活动如何影响剖宫产术后试产的成功率和子宫破裂的风险?一项随机对照试验队列的探索性、盲法分析。
BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):976-984. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17005. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
4
Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.与再次剖宫产相比,对于没有其他风险因素的产妇,行试产。这些产妇的唯一风险因素是曾行剖宫产。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Nov;92(11):1256-63. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12240.
5
Uterine rupture without previous caesarean delivery: a population-based cohort study.无既往剖宫产史的子宫破裂:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:151-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
6
Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.既往有剖宫产史的女性引产术后子宫破裂
BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):451-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x.
7
Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience.剖宫产术后试产的产时管理:证据与经验。
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):157-62. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12449. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
8
Complicated primary cesarean delivery increases the risk for uterine rupture at subsequent trial of labor after cesarean.复杂的初次剖宫产会增加再次剖宫产试产时子宫破裂的风险。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;298(2):273-277. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4801-x. Epub 2018 May 24.
9
Neonatal outcomes following a trial of labor after Caesarean delivery: a population-based study.剖宫产术后试产的新生儿结局:一项基于人群的研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Aug;31(16):2148-2154. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1337740. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
10
Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?孕周是影响子宫瘢痕破裂率的独立变量吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 May 1;126(1):68-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.07.021. Epub 2005 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for complete uterine rupture in patients with trial of labor after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后阴道试产患者完全子宫破裂的危险因素。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Feb;104(2):380-388. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15017. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
2
Outcome of subsequent pregnancies in women with complete uterine rupture: A population-based case-control study.完全性子宫破裂患者再次妊娠结局:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):506-513. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14338. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
3
Vaginal birth after caesarean section before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth.

本文引用的文献

1
Caesarean section surgical techniques: 3 year follow-up of the CORONIS fractional, factorial, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.剖宫产手术技术:CORONIS分组、析因、非盲法、随机对照试验的3年随访
Lancet. 2016 Jul 2;388(10039):62-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00204-X. Epub 2016 May 4.
2
Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.剖宫产术后子宫关闭对子宫肌层残余厚度的影响:一项随机对照试验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):507.e1-507.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
3
The Nordic Obstetric Surveillance Study: a study of complete uterine rupture, abnormally invasive placenta, peripartum hysterectomy, and severe blood loss at delivery.
COVID-19 大流行前后的剖宫产术后阴道分娩。与阴道分娩成功相关的因素。
Women Birth. 2022 Nov;35(6):570-575. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
4
Intentions and influencing factors regarding natural childbirth among urban pregnant women in China, based on the theory of reasoned action and structural equation modeling.基于理性行动理论和结构方程模型的中国城市孕妇自然分娩意向及影响因素研究
J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4482-4491. doi: 10.1177/0300060519862089. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
北欧产科监测研究:一项关于完全性子宫破裂、胎盘植入异常、产时子宫切除术及分娩时严重失血的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jul;94(7):734-744. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12639. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
4
The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study.与双层缝合相比,单层缝合并不会增加子宫破裂的风险:一项瑞典队列研究。
BJOG. 2015 Oct;122(11):1535-41. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13015. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
5
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.剖宫产时子宫切口及子宫缝合的手术技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 22;2014(7):CD004732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004732.pub3.
6
Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis.单层与双层缝合关闭方式对不良结局和子宫瘢痕缺损的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):453-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
7
Use of ICD-10 codes to monitor uterine rupture: validation of a national birth registry.使用 ICD-10 编码监测子宫破裂:国家出生登记处的验证。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Feb;173:23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.033. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
8
Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery.与再次剖宫产相比,对于没有其他风险因素的产妇,行试产。这些产妇的唯一风险因素是曾行剖宫产。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Nov;92(11):1256-63. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12240.
9
Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK: a national case-control study.英国计划分娩方式所致的子宫破裂:一项全国性病例对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
10
Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture.剖宫产术中子宫切口单层缝合与双层缝合与子宫破裂风险的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Oct;115(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.013. Epub 2011 Jul 26.