Suppr超能文献

内镜切除捕获标记法切除息肉后的一一对应部位:一项随机前瞻性研究。

One-to-One Correspondence Locations of Resected Polyps after Endoscopic Resection Using Catcher Tagged Method: A Randomized Prospective Study.

机构信息

Departments of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Miki, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ehime Rosai Hospital, Niihama, Japan.

出版信息

Digestion. 2017 Nov;96(4):239-247. doi: 10.1159/000484043. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Multiple colorectal polyps with a diameter in the range of 10-19 mm are unable to be retrieved through a 3-mm endoscopic channel by the aspiration method. This study aims to assess the usefulness of Catcher Tag retrieval, which not only allows the accurate identification of the resected location but also enables the easiest retrieval in a short time without any special device.

METHODS

One hundred thirty five patients (483 polyps) were diagnosed with colorectal neoplasm, and 64 patients (225 polyps) were enrolled and randomly allocated into the Net forceps group (NET) and the Catcher Tagged group (TAG). In TAG, 3 types of colored ring-threads were used to retrieve resected polyps. After local injection of natural saline, ring-threads were placed close to polyps. The primary outcome was the number of one-to-one correspondence locations (UMIN000020826).

RESULTS

There was significant difference in one-to-one correspondence (p = 0.004). The average retrieval procedure time was 13.56 ± 3.47 (min) in NET and 3.55 ± 1.68 in TAG (p = 0.006). In NET, 1 polyp in each of 4 cases was lost during endoscopic mucosal resection and 2 polyps were lost in 1 case. In TAG, no polyp was lost (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The Catcher Tagged method is very useful for accurate one-to-one correspondence locations and pathological evaluation, and easy-to-retrieve multiple resected specimens.

摘要

背景/目的:直径在 10-19 毫米范围内的多个结直肠息肉无法通过抽吸法通过 3 毫米的内镜通道取出。本研究旨在评估 Catcher Tag 回收的有用性,该方法不仅可以准确识别切除部位,还可以在不使用任何特殊设备的情况下,在最短的时间内轻松回收。

方法

诊断为结直肠肿瘤的 135 例患者(483 个息肉),其中 64 例患者(225 个息肉)入组并随机分为网抓钳组(NET)和 Catcher Tag 组(TAG)。在 TAG 中,使用 3 种彩色环纹线来回收切除的息肉。在局部注射生理盐水后,将环纹线放置在息肉附近。主要结局是一一对应部位的数量(UMIN000020826)。

结果

一一对应部位有显著差异(p=0.004)。NET 的平均回收程序时间为 13.56±3.47(min),TAG 为 3.55±1.68(min)(p=0.006)。在 NET 中,有 4 例各有 1 个息肉在内镜黏膜切除术期间丢失,1 例丢失 2 个息肉。在 TAG 中,没有息肉丢失(p=0.016)。

结论

Catcher Tag 方法对于准确的一一对应部位和病理评估以及易于回收多个切除标本非常有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验