Suppr超能文献

热圈套息肉切除术联合或不联合生理盐水/肾上腺素提升在完全切除小的结直肠息肉中的应用。

Hot snare polypectomy with or without saline solution/epinephrine lift for the complete resection of small colorectal polyps.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea.

Department of Pathology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jun;87(6):1539-1547. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.031. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The criteria for a standard polypectomy technique for complete removal of small colorectal polyps has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the complete resection rate of hot snare polypectomy (HSP) with that of EMR for small, sessile, or flat polyps.

METHODS

Patients with 5- to 9-mm non-pedunculated colorectal polyps were prospectively randomized to the HSP or EMR group. The presence of residual polyps was assessed by performing histologic assessment of 4-quadrant forceps biopsy specimens taken from the edges of the polypectomy site. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate after HSP or EMR; the secondary outcomes were the proportion of procedure-related adverse events and specimen-loss rate. Sample size was estimated using a superiority trial design. We assumed that the complete resection rate of the EMR group would be at least 8% higher than that of the HSP group.

RESULTS

A total of 382 polyps in 269 patients were assessed and randomly assigned to each method using 4 × 4 block randomization. Of these, 353 polyps were finally analyzed based on the pathology results. The mean polyp size was 6.3 ± 1.3 mm. The complete resection rate did not differ between the HSP and EMR groups (88.4% [152/172] vs 92.8% [168/181], respectively; P = .2). The intraprocedural bleeding rate, immediately after polypectomy, was significantly higher in the HSP group than in the EMR group (5.2% vs 0.6%, respectively; P = .009). However, clinically significant bleeding and tissue retrieval failure rates did not differ between the groups. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, sessile serrated adenoma/polyps or hyperplastic polyps were almost 3 times (odds ratio, 2.824; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-7.75; P = .044) more likely to be incompletely resected compared with other conventional adenomatous polyps. Except for pathology, we found no significant independent predictors for incomplete resection.

CONCLUSION

EMR for small non-pedunculated colorectal polyps is not superior to HSP in terms of complete resection or safety. Both methods can be performed according to the endoscopist's preference. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0001640; cris.nih.go.kr.).

摘要

背景和目的

尚未确定用于完全切除小结直肠息肉的标准息肉切除术技术的标准。本研究旨在比较热活检钳息肉切除术(HSP)与内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)治疗小的无蒂或平坦息肉的完全切除率。

方法

前瞻性将 5-9mm 无蒂结直肠息肉患者随机分为 HSP 或 EMR 组。通过对息肉切除部位边缘进行 4 象限钳活检标本进行组织学评估,评估残留息肉的存在。主要结局是 HSP 或 EMR 后的完全切除率;次要结局是与操作相关的不良事件的比例和标本丢失率。使用优效性试验设计估计样本量。我们假设 EMR 组的完全切除率至少比 HSP 组高 8%。

结果

对 269 例患者的 382 个息肉进行了评估,并使用 4×4 块随机化将每个方法随机分配。其中,根据病理结果最终分析了 353 个息肉。平均息肉大小为 6.3±1.3mm。HSP 和 EMR 组的完全切除率无差异(分别为 88.4%[152/172]和 92.8%[168/181];P=.2)。HSP 组术中即刻出血率明显高于 EMR 组(分别为 5.2%和 0.6%;P=.009)。然而,两组的临床显著出血和组织采集失败率无差异。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉或增生性息肉与其他传统腺瘤性息肉相比,几乎有 3 倍(优势比,2.824;95%置信区间,1.03-7.75;P=.044)更可能未完全切除。除了病理,我们没有发现不完全切除的其他显著独立预测因素。

结论

对于小的无蒂结直肠息肉,EMR 在完全切除或安全性方面并不优于 HSP。两种方法都可以根据内镜医生的喜好进行。(临床试验注册号:KCT0001640;cris.nih.go.kr.)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验