• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中性肽链内切酶/肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂LCZ696的安全性

Safety of the neprilysin/renin-angiotensin system inhibitor LCZ696.

作者信息

Li Bo, Zhao Yunhe, Yin Bo, Helian Mengfei, Wang Xinmei, Chen Feng, Zhang Hongxia, Sun Hui, Meng Bin, An Fengshuang

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo, 255036, PR China.

Department of Pathology, Central Hospital of Zibo, Zibo, 255036, PR China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 May 31;8(47):83323-83333. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18312. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.

DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.18312
PMID:29137346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5669972/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The combined neprilysin/rennin-angiotensin system inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) has shown its superiority over ACEI/ARB therapy. In view of the existing concern of its adverse effects, we aimed to provide evidence of the safety of the new drug.

RESULTS

A total of 6 randomized trials with 11,821 subjects were included in this analysis. No significant differences were found in any adverse effects between LCZ696 and ACEI/ARB or placebo groups. LCZ696 significantly decreased the risks of serious adverse events and death compared with ACEI/ARB. LCZ696 also significantly decrease the risk of discontinuation of treatment for any adverse event no matter compared with ACEI/ARB or a placebo. LCZ696 significantly increased the risk of angioedema and dizziness, while it decreased the risk of renal dysfunction and bronchitis. There was no difference for hypotension, hyperkalemia, cough, upper respiratory tract inflammation, diarrhoea, back pain, nasopharyngitis, headache and influenza between the LCZ696 group and the ACEI/ARB group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis of eligible studies that used LCZ696 in heart failure and hypertension was performed. Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with data on any adverse effects, serious adverse events, discontinuation of treatment for any adverse event, death, angioedema, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and other adverse effects to perform this meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the beneficial effect of LCZ696 on end point events, the available evidences showed that LCZ696 was associated with less drug-risks than a placebo and ACEI/ARB.

摘要

目的

新型脑啡肽酶/肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)已显示出优于ACEI/ARB疗法的效果。鉴于目前对其不良反应的担忧,我们旨在提供该新药安全性的证据。

结果

本分析纳入了6项随机试验,共11821名受试者。LCZ696组与ACEI/ARB组或安慰剂组在任何不良反应方面均未发现显著差异。与ACEI/ARB相比,LCZ696显著降低了严重不良事件和死亡风险。无论与ACEI/ARB还是安慰剂相比,LCZ696也显著降低了因任何不良事件而停药的风险。LCZ696显著增加了血管性水肿和头晕的风险,同时降低了肾功能不全和支气管炎的风险。LCZ696组与ACEI/ARB组在低血压、高钾血症、咳嗽、上呼吸道炎症、腹泻、背痛、鼻咽炎、头痛和流感方面无差异。

材料与方法

对在心力衰竭和高血压中使用LCZ696的合格研究进行荟萃分析。检索了Embase、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆,以获取有关任何不良反应、严重不良事件、因任何不良事件停药、死亡、血管性水肿、低血压、高钾血症及其他不良反应数据的随机对照试验(RCT),以进行此项荟萃分析。

结论

除了LCZ696对终点事件的有益作用外,现有证据表明,与安慰剂和ACEI/ARB相比,LCZ696的药物风险更低。

相似文献

1
Safety of the neprilysin/renin-angiotensin system inhibitor LCZ696.中性肽链内切酶/肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂LCZ696的安全性
Oncotarget. 2017 May 31;8(47):83323-83333. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18312. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
2
Adverse Events of Sacubitril/Valsartan: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.沙库巴曲缬沙坦的不良反应:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 1;78(2):202-210. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001049.
3
LCZ696 and preservation of renal function in heart failure: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials.LCZ696 与心力衰竭患者肾功能的保护:6 项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Mar 30;21(1):113-118. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.01.2.
4
Sacubitril/valsartan: A novel angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor.沙库巴曲缬沙坦:一种新型血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂。
Indian Heart J. 2018 Jul;70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S102-S110. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure compared to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.与肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci. 2023 May 14;19(3):565-576. doi: 10.5114/aoms/159113. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Hypertension.沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗高血压的疗效
Am J Ther. 2022;29(3):e322-e333. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000925.
7
Effect and safety of LCZ696 in the treatment of hypertension: A meta-analysis of 9 RCT studies.LCZ696治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:9项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(28):e16093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016093.
8
Safety and tolerability of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor versus the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂联合用药对左心室功能不全患者的安全性和耐受性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Card Fail. 2008 Apr;14(3):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2007.11.008.
9
Renal events in patients receiving neprilysin inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受 Neprilysin 抑制剂治疗的患者的肾脏事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Nov 23;37(12):2418-2428. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac001.
10
Combined Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism and Neprilysin Inhibition.血管紧张素受体拮抗剂与中性内肽酶抑制剂联合使用
Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1115-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018622.

引用本文的文献

1
Neprilysin inhibitors and risk of Alzheimer's disease: A future perspective.奈普利酶抑制剂与阿尔茨海默病风险:未来展望。
J Cell Mol Med. 2024 Jan;28(2):e17993. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17993. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
2
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure compared to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.与肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Med Sci. 2023 May 14;19(3):565-576. doi: 10.5114/aoms/159113. eCollection 2023.
3
Our Experience With Sacubitril/Valsartan in Chronic Heart Failure Management - HFrEF in the Ambulatory Setting.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Crystalline Valsartan/Sacubitril (LCZ696) Compared With Placebo and Combinations of Free Valsartan and Sacubitril in Patients With Systolic Hypertension: The RATIO Study.与安慰剂及缬沙坦和沙库巴曲游离组合相比,结晶型缬沙坦/沙库巴曲(LCZ696)治疗收缩期高血压患者的疗效和安全性:RATIO研究
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;69(6):374-381. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000485.
2
Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan on Central Hemodynamics in the Elderly With Systolic Hypertension: The PARAMETER Study.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与奥美沙坦对老年收缩期高血压患者中心血流动力学的影响:PARAMETER研究
Hypertension. 2017 Mar;69(3):411-420. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08556. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
3
我们在慢性心力衰竭管理中使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦的经验——门诊射血分数降低型心力衰竭。
Med Arch. 2022 Apr;76(2):101-107. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2022.76.101-107.
4
Evaluation of Drug-Related Receptors in Children With Dilated Cardiomyopathy.扩张型心肌病患儿药物相关受体的评估
Front Pediatr. 2019 Oct 1;7:387. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00387. eCollection 2019.
5
Effect and safety of LCZ696 in the treatment of hypertension: A meta-analysis of 9 RCT studies.LCZ696治疗高血压的疗效与安全性:9项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(28):e16093. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016093.
6
A comprehensive review of chronic heart failure pharmacotherapy treatment approaches in African Americans.非裔美国人慢性心力衰竭药物治疗方法的综合综述。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec;13:1753944719840192. doi: 10.1177/1753944719840192.
7
Stable but Progressive Nature of Heart Failure: Considerations for Primary Care Physicians.心力衰竭的稳定但进展的性质:基层医疗保健医生的考虑因素。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2018 Oct;18(5):333-345. doi: 10.1007/s40256-018-0277-0.
Combined neprilysin and renin-angiotensin system inhibition in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.
联合使用 Neprilysin 和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂治疗射血分数降低的心力衰竭:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;18(10):1238-1243. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.603. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
4
2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America.2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心力衰竭学会关于心力衰竭新药物治疗的聚焦更新:2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心力衰竭管理指南的更新:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组和美国心力衰竭学会的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 27;68(13):1476-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 May 20.
5
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.2016欧洲心脏病学会急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)急性和慢性心力衰竭诊断与治疗工作组编写,欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会(HFA)提供特别贡献。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. Epub 2016 May 20.
6
Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) After Single-Dose Administration in Healthy Chinese Subjects.沙库巴曲缬沙坦(LCZ696)在中国健康受试者单剂量给药后的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2017 Feb;42(1):109-116. doi: 10.1007/s13318-016-0328-3.
7
The effect of statins on microalbuminuria, proteinuria, progression of kidney function, and all-cause mortality in patients with non-end stage chronic kidney disease: A meta-analysis.他汀类药物对非终末期慢性肾脏病患者微量白蛋白尿、蛋白尿、肾功能进展和全因死亡率的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Pharmacol Res. 2016 Mar;105:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
8
Safety and efficacy of LCZ696, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, in Japanese patients with hypertension and renal dysfunction.一流的血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂LCZ696在日本高血压合并肾功能不全患者中的安全性和有效性。
Hypertens Res. 2015 Apr;38(4):269-75. doi: 10.1038/hr.2015.1. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
9
Neprilysin inhibitors preserve renal function in heart failure.中性肽链内切酶抑制剂可在心力衰竭中保护肾功能。
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Jan 20;179:329-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.059. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
10
Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure.血管紧张素-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与依那普利治疗心力衰竭的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077. Epub 2014 Aug 30.