Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):258.e1-258.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.553. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
High-fidelity simulation creates conditions that resemble real circumstances, and can help teach procedures such as intrauterine contraception placement. Its impact on skill retention has not been studied.
We sought to evaluate novice learners' skills, attitudes, and knowledge on placement of intrauterine contraception when trained using a high-fidelity commercially available simulator compared with a low-fidelity simulator.
We recruited senior nurse practitioner students and interns in obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine inexperienced with intrauterine contraception placement. In this unblinded, randomized controlled trial, participants were assigned to practice within a high-fidelity simulator group or a coasterlike model group. We evaluated intrauterine contraception placement skills, self-perceived comfort and competence, and knowledge before and after simulation, as well as at 3 months. Our primary outcome was the change in scores for intrauterine contraception placement skills before and after practice. Assuming a standard deviation of 15 points, we needed 10 participants per group to detect a 20-point difference in scores with 80% power.
From June through July 2014, 60 participants enrolled; 59 completed the initial study visit and 1 withdrew. In all, 48 (80%) completed the second study visit at 3 months. Demographic characteristics were similar for the randomization groups. We observed an improvement in intrauterine contraception placement skills for both groups following practice on simulators (P < .01); the proportion that improved was similar (20% for the high-fidelity simulator group and 15% for the coaster group, P = .55). Increases in self-perceived comfort and competence with placing copper, levonorgestrel 52-mg, and levonorgestrel 13.5-mg devices were similar (all P ≥ .11). Knowledge assessment scores were comparable between the 2 groups postsimulation (73% for the high-fidelity simulator group and 80% for the coaster group, P = .29) and at 3 months (87% for both groups, P = 1.0).
Trainees' knowledge, intrauterine contraception placement skills, and self-perceived comfort and competence were comparable whether they used high- or low-fidelity simulators.
高保真模拟创造了类似于真实情况的条件,可帮助教授宫内节育器放置等操作。但它对技能保留的影响尚未得到研究。
我们旨在评估新手学习者在使用高保真商业可用模拟器与低保真模拟器进行培训时,在宫内节育器放置方面的技能、态度和知识。
我们招募了没有宫内节育器放置经验的资深护士从业者学生和妇产科及家庭医学实习医生。在这项非盲、随机对照试验中,参与者被分配到高保真模拟器组或类似过山车模型组进行练习。我们在模拟前后以及 3 个月时评估宫内节育器放置技能、自我感知舒适度和能力以及知识。我们的主要结局是宫内节育器放置技能在练习前后的变化。假设标准差为 15 分,我们需要每组 10 名参与者,才能以 80%的功效检测出分数相差 20 分的情况。
2014 年 6 月至 7 月,共有 60 名参与者入组;59 名完成了初始研究访视,1 名退出。总共,48 名(80%)在 3 个月时完成了第二次研究访视。随机分组的参与者在人口统计学特征上相似。两组参与者在使用模拟器进行练习后,宫内节育器放置技能均有所提高(均 P<.01);提高的比例相似(高保真模拟器组为 20%,过山车组为 15%,P=.55)。铜质、左炔诺孕酮 52mg 和左炔诺孕酮 13.5mg 装置的自我感知舒适度和能力的增加也相似(均 P≥.11)。模拟后两组的知识评估分数相似(高保真模拟器组为 73%,过山车组为 80%,P=.29)和 3 个月时的分数相似(两组均为 87%,P=1.0)。
无论使用高保真还是低保真模拟器,培训者的知识、宫内节育器放置技能以及自我感知舒适度和能力都相似。