Saadat Victoria M
Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Cent Asian J Glob Health. 2016 Jan 4;4(2):225. doi: 10.5195/cajgh.2015.225. eCollection 2015.
The dissolution of the USSR resulted in independence for constituent republics but left them battling an unstable economic environment and healthcare. Increases in injection drug use, prostitution, and migration were all widespread responses to this transition and have contributed to the emergence of an HIV epidemic in the countries of former Soviet Union. Researchers have begun to identify the risks of HIV infection as well as the barriers to HIV testing and treatment in the former Soviet Union. Significant methodological challenges have arisen and need to be addressed. The objective of this review is to determine common threads in HIV research in the former Soviet Union and provide useful recommendations for future research studies.
In this systematic review of the literature, Pubmed was searched for English-language studies using the key search terms "HIV", "AIDS", "human immunodeficiency virus", "acquired immune deficiency syndrome", "Central Asia", "Kazakhstan", "Kyrgyzstan", "Uzbekistan", "Tajikistan", "Turkmenistan", "Russia", "Ukraine", "Armenia", "Azerbaijan", and "Georgia". Studies were evaluated against eligibility criteria for inclusion.
Thirty-nine studies were identified across the two main topic areas of HIV risk and barriers to testing and treatment, themes subsequently referred to as "risk" and "barriers". Study design was predominantly cross-sectional. The most frequently used sampling methods were peer-to-peer and non-probabilistic sampling. The most frequently reported risks were condom misuse, risky intercourse, and unsafe practices among injection drug users. Common barriers to testing included that testing was inconvenient, and that results would not remain confidential. Frequent barriers to treatment were based on a distrust in the treatment system.
The findings of this review reveal methodological limitations that span the existing studies. Small sample size, cross-sectional design, and non-probabilistic sampling methods were frequently reported limitations. Future work is needed to examine barriers to testing and treatment as well as longitudinal studies on HIV risk over time in most-at-risk populations.
苏联解体使得各加盟共和国获得独立,但却让它们陷入了经济环境不稳定和医疗保健困境之中。注射吸毒、卖淫和移民现象的增加都是对这种转型的普遍反应,并且在前苏联国家引发了艾滋病疫情。研究人员已开始识别前苏联地区艾滋病毒感染的风险以及艾滋病毒检测和治疗的障碍。由此出现了重大的方法学挑战,需要加以应对。本综述的目的是确定前苏联地区艾滋病毒研究中的共同要点,并为未来的研究提供有益建议。
在本次文献系统综述中,我们在PubMed数据库中搜索了英文研究,使用的关键搜索词包括“艾滋病毒”“艾滋病”“人类免疫缺陷病毒”“获得性免疫缺陷综合征”“中亚”“哈萨克斯坦”“吉尔吉斯斯坦”“乌兹别克斯坦”“塔吉克斯坦”“土库曼斯坦”“俄罗斯”“乌克兰”“亚美尼亚”“阿塞拜疆”和“格鲁吉亚”。根据纳入标准对研究进行评估。
在艾滋病毒风险以及检测和治疗障碍这两个主要主题领域共识别出39项研究,这些主题随后被称为“风险”和“障碍”。研究设计主要为横断面研究。最常用的抽样方法是 peer-to-peer 和非概率抽样。最常报告的风险是避孕套使用不当、危险性行为以及注射吸毒者中的不安全行为。检测的常见障碍包括检测不方便以及结果无法保密。治疗的常见障碍是对治疗系统不信任。
本综述的结果揭示了现有研究中存在的方法学局限性。样本量小、横断面设计和非概率抽样方法是经常报告的局限性。未来需要开展工作,研究检测和治疗的障碍以及对高危人群中艾滋病毒风险随时间变化的纵向研究。