Li Shuyu D, Martial Annia, Schrock Alexa B, Liu Jane J
Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA.
Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT 06902 USA.
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2017 Nov 6;6:29. doi: 10.1186/s40164-017-0089-y. eCollection 2017.
The treatment algorithm for metastatic non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) has been evolving rapidly due to the development of new therapeutic agents. Although guidelines are provided by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for treatment options according to biomarker testing results, sequentially applying the three main modalities (chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy) remains an ad hoc practice in clinic. In light of recent FDA approval of dabrafenib and trametinib combination for metastatic NSCLCs with V600E mutation, one question arises due to insufficient clinical data is if the targeted therapy should be used before immunotherapy in patients with both V600E and PD-L1 expression.
We present a case of 74-year-old female, former smoker with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. The V600E mutation among other abnormalities was identified by comprehensive genomic profiling. The patient had an excellent 2-year response to the combination of pemetrexed and sorafenib. The patient was then treated with dabrafenib due to the presence of the V600E mutation and intolerance to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Not only the patient had an 18-month durable response to dabrafenib, she experienced outstanding quality of life with no serious adverse effects. At the time of symptomatic progression, the patient was then treated with two cycles of pembrolizumab based on her positive PD-L1 staining (90%). She had early response and came off pembrolizumab due to side effects. Seven months after initiation of pembrolizumab, the patient is off all the therapy and is currently asymptomatic. The patient is surviving with metastatic disease for over 7 years as of to date.
By appropriately sequencing the three main modalities of systemic therapies, we are able to achieve long-term disease control with minimal side effects even in a geriatric patient with multiple comorbidities. We argue that it is reasonable to first use a BRAF inhibitor before considering immunotherapy for NSCLCs positive for both V600E and PD-L1.
由于新型治疗药物的出现,转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗方案正在迅速发展。尽管美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)根据生物标志物检测结果提供了治疗选择指南,但在临床上依次应用三种主要治疗方式(化疗、靶向治疗和免疫治疗)仍然是一种临时做法。鉴于美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)最近批准达拉非尼和曲美替尼联合用于治疗具有V600E突变的转移性NSCLC,由于临床数据不足,一个问题随之而来,即对于同时具有V600E和PD-L1表达的患者,靶向治疗是否应在免疫治疗之前使用。
我们报告一例74岁女性、既往吸烟者,患有转移性肺腺癌。通过全面基因组分析发现了V600E突变以及其他异常情况。该患者对培美曲塞和索拉非尼联合治疗有2年的良好反应。由于存在V600E突变且对细胞毒性化疗不耐受,该患者随后接受了达拉非尼治疗。该患者不仅对达拉非尼有18个月的持久反应,而且生活质量良好,没有严重不良反应。在出现症状性进展时,基于其PD-L1染色阳性(90%),该患者随后接受了两个周期的帕博利珠单抗治疗。她有早期反应,但因副作用而停用帕博利珠单抗。开始使用帕博利珠单抗七个月后,该患者停止了所有治疗,目前无症状。截至目前,该患者转移性疾病存活已超过7年。
通过合理安排全身治疗的三种主要方式的顺序,即使是患有多种合并症的老年患者,我们也能够以最小的副作用实现长期疾病控制。我们认为,对于V600E和PD-L1均为阳性的NSCLC患者,在考虑免疫治疗之前先使用BRAF抑制剂是合理的。