• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髓系肿瘤的复发和细胞遗传学演变。

Relapse and cytogenetic evolution in myeloid neoplasms.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA -

出版信息

Panminerva Med. 2017 Dec;59(4):308-319. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.17.03380-8.

DOI:10.23736/S0031-0808.17.03380-8
PMID:29144072
Abstract

Based on the current WHO Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms, cytogenetic findings play a central role in the diagnostic classification of the myeloid malignancies. Cytogenetic abnormalities detected at primary diagnosis may change over time. Karyotype changes can be characterized as cytogenetic evolution, cytogenetic regression or a combination of both. While the exact mechanism of cytogenetic evolution is not completely understood, the process of cytogenetic evolution is not random, but follows different, and often disease-specific patterns during progression and relapse of myeloid neoplasms. Important lessons were learned from the cytogenetic evolution pathways observed over the course of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), progressing through chronic phase into accelerated phase and blast crisis. Cytogenetic evolution pathways of CML are divided into major and minor route abnormalities. The major route changes include an extra Ph chromosome (+Ph) trisomy 8 (+8) and the occurrence of an i(17q). The six most common minor route abnormalities include -7, -17, +17, +21 and -Y and one structural change, t(3;21). Recently an increased number of CML cases with karyotype abnormalities in Ph-negative cells have been reported in patients treated with imatinib. These abnormalities include trisomy 8, abnormalities of chromosome 7, and chromosome 20. The significance of the Ph-negative karyotype changes in subsequent development of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is unclear. Nevertheless, the occurrence of clonal abnormalities in Ph-negative cells underlines the importance of conventional cytogenetic studies in monitoring of CML patients. In AML, karyotype changes commonly occur between diagnosis and relapse status post chemotherapy. Karyotype evolution seems more common in patients who had unfavorable aberrations at diagnosis as compared to patients with favorable or intermediate abnormalities. Karyotype evolution results in shortened remission duration as compared to cases without cytogenetic change. Recent studies on cytogenetic evolution at relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) were similar to the data observed in chemotherapy-treated AML. Serial bone marrow evaluations after allo-HCT offer insights into the dynamics of karyotype evolution, notably, they demonstrated that a detection of karyotype abnormalities is usually followed by a relapse within the next 90 days. As a contrast, karyotype abnormalities were not observed in patients who do not relapse in the next 3 months. CGE at relapse was associated with significantly decreased postrelapse and post-transplantation survival compared with the non-CGE group. Very few data exist regarding a potential association between the dose or certain types of chemotherapy and cytogenetic evolution. Based on the results of a single study conducted recently, no specific chemotherapy regimen emerged to predispose for cytogenetic evolution. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of the altered bone marrow environment and immunosuppression on karyotype stability.

摘要

基于目前的世界卫生组织(WHO)髓系肿瘤分类,细胞遗传学发现在髓系恶性肿瘤的诊断分类中起着核心作用。在原发性诊断时检测到的细胞遗传学异常可能随时间而变化。核型变化可被描述为细胞遗传学进化、细胞遗传学消退或两者的组合。虽然细胞遗传学进化的确切机制尚不完全清楚,但在髓系肿瘤的进展和复发过程中,细胞遗传学进化的过程并非随机,而是遵循不同的、通常是特定于疾病的模式。从慢性髓系白血病(CML)过程中观察到的细胞遗传学进化途径中吸取了重要的经验教训,该疾病从慢性期进展为加速期和急变期。CML 的细胞遗传学进化途径分为主要途径和次要途径异常。主要途径的改变包括额外的 Ph 染色体(+Ph)三体 8(+8)和 i(17q)的发生。六个最常见的次要途径异常包括-7、-17、+17、+21 和-Y 以及一个结构改变,t(3;21)。最近,在接受伊马替尼治疗的患者中,报告了越来越多的 Ph 阴性细胞中存在细胞遗传学异常的 CML 病例。这些异常包括三体 8、7 号染色体异常和 20 号染色体异常。Ph 阴性核型变化在随后发生骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)或急性髓系白血病(AML)中的意义尚不清楚。然而,Ph 阴性细胞中克隆异常的发生强调了常规细胞遗传学研究在监测 CML 患者中的重要性。在 AML 中,核型变化通常发生在诊断后和化疗后复发状态之间。与具有有利或中间异常的患者相比,具有不利异常的患者中更常发生核型进化。与没有细胞遗传学改变的病例相比,核型进化导致缓解持续时间缩短。最近对异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)后复发时细胞遗传学进化的研究与在化疗治疗的 AML 中观察到的数据相似。allo-HCT 后连续骨髓评估提供了对核型进化动态的深入了解,特别是,它们表明核型异常的检测通常在接下来的 90 天内会导致复发。相比之下,在接下来的 3 个月内没有复发的患者中未观察到核型异常。与非 CGE 组相比,复发时的 CGE 与复发后和移植后生存明显降低相关。关于特定剂量或特定类型的化疗与细胞遗传学进化之间潜在关联的信息非常有限。基于最近进行的一项单一研究的结果,没有特定的化疗方案被认为会导致细胞遗传学进化。需要进一步的研究来评估骨髓环境改变和免疫抑制对核型稳定性的影响。

相似文献

1
Relapse and cytogenetic evolution in myeloid neoplasms.髓系肿瘤的复发和细胞遗传学演变。
Panminerva Med. 2017 Dec;59(4):308-319. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.17.03380-8.
2
Cytogenetic Evolution in Myeloid Neoplasms at Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Association with Previous Chemotherapy and Effect on Survival.异基因造血细胞移植后复发的髓系肿瘤的细胞遗传学演变:与既往化疗的关联及对生存的影响
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 May;23(5):782-789. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
Cytomegalovirus Reactivation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Relapse in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Survived to Day 100 after Transplantation: The Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Transplantation-related Complication Working Group.异基因造血干细胞移植后巨细胞病毒再激活与移植后存活至第100天的急性髓系白血病患者复发风险降低相关:日本造血细胞移植学会移植相关并发症工作组
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Nov;21(11):2008-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
4
Acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 17 abnormalities and long-term outcomes with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.伴有 17 号染色体异常的急性髓系白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征,以及造血干细胞移植与否的长期预后。
Leuk Res. 2020 Aug;95:106402. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2020.106402. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Cytogenetic correlation with disease status and treatment outcome in advanced stage leukemia post bone marrow transplantation: a Southwest Oncology Group study (SWOG-8612).晚期白血病骨髓移植后细胞遗传学与疾病状态及治疗结果的相关性:西南肿瘤协作组研究(SWOG-8612)
Leuk Res. 1995 Jun;19(6):381-8. doi: 10.1016/0145-2126(94)00162-4.
6
Cytogenetic abnormalities in 532 patients with myeloid leukemias and myelodyplastic syndrome. The Czechoslovak MDS Cooperative Group.532例髓系白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征患者的细胞遗传学异常。捷克斯洛伐克骨髓增生异常综合征合作组
Czech Med. 1990;13(4):133-44.
7
Impact of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System, cytogenetics and monosomal karyotype on outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute myeloid leukemia evolving from myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective multicenter study of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation.修订后的国际预后评分系统、细胞遗传学和单倍体核型对骨髓增生异常综合征及由骨髓增生异常综合征演变而来的继发性急性髓系白血病异基因干细胞移植后结局的影响:欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会的一项回顾性多中心研究
Haematologica. 2015 Mar;100(3):400-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.116715. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
8
Ring chromosome in myeloid neoplasms is associated with complex karyotype and disease progression.髓系肿瘤中的环状染色体与复杂核型和疾病进展相关。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Oct;68:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
9
Myeloid Neoplasms Following Solid Organ Transplantation: Clinicopathologic Studies of 23 Cases.实体器官移植后的骨髓增生性肿瘤:23 例临床病理研究。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2017 Dec 20;149(1):55-66. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqx133.
10
Cytogenetic and molecular genetic evolution of chronic myeloid leukemia.慢性髓系白血病的细胞遗传学和分子遗传学演变
Acta Haematol. 2002;107(2):76-94. doi: 10.1159/000046636.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood Cancer: Occurrence, Treatment and Risk of Second Primary Malignancies.儿童癌症:发病情况、治疗及二次原发性恶性肿瘤风险
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 26;13(11):2607. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112607.
2
3D Telomere Structure Analysis to DetectGenomic Instability and Cytogenetic Evolutionin Myelodysplastic Syndromes.3D 端粒结构分析检测骨髓增生异常综合征中的基因组不稳定性和细胞遗传学演变。
Cells. 2019 Apr 2;8(4):304. doi: 10.3390/cells8040304.