Suppr超能文献

高频振荡通气与传统通气对右心衰竭犬器官血流及心血管系统的影响

Organ blood flow and cardiovascular effects of high-frequency oscillation versus conventional ventilation in dogs with right heart failure.

作者信息

Lucking S E, Williams T M, Mickell J J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Medical Center, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond 23298.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1989 Feb;17(2):158-62. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198902000-00011.

Abstract

Mongrel dogs underwent a large (apex to pulmonary valve) right ventriculotomy to produce right ventricular dysfunction. Right ventriculotomy decreased cardiac output from 2.47 +/- 0.43 to 1.34 +/- 0.16 L/min (p less than .01), increased CVP from 3.7 +/- 1.5 to 8.3 +/- 2.4 mm Hg (p less than .01), and decreased mean systemic arterial pressure (MAP) from 143 +/- 16 to 121 +/- 21 mm Hg (p less than .01). There was no effect on mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) or pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. After stabilization a randomized crossover controlled comparison of conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and high-frequency oscillation (HFO) was performed. FIO2, pH, PCO2, core temperature, and preload were held constant. Mean airway pressure (Paw) was 4.8 +/- 0.7 cm H2O on CMV vs. 3.5 +/- 1.0 cm H2O on HFO (p less than .05). There was no difference in PaO2. We found no statistically significant differences between the two modes of ventilation with respect to cardiac output, MAP, MPAP, systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary vascular resistance. Blood flows to cerebral cortex, renal cortex, adrenal, hepatic artery, left ventricular myocardium, and skeletal muscle were not different when comparing CMV to HFO. Despite the ability to attain equivalent oxygenation and ventilation at lower Paw, HFO offers no hemodynamic advantage over CMV in the presence of right ventricular dysfunction.

摘要

杂种犬接受了大的(心尖至肺动脉瓣)右心室切开术以产生右心室功能障碍。右心室切开术使心输出量从2.47±0.43降至1.34±0.16L/分钟(p<0.01),中心静脉压从3.7±1.5升高至8.3±2.4mmHg(p<0.01),平均体动脉压(MAP)从143±16降至121±21mmHg(p<0.01)。对平均肺动脉压(MPAP)或肺动脉闭塞压无影响。在稳定后,进行了常规机械通气(CMV)和高频振荡(HFO)的随机交叉对照比较。维持吸入氧分数(FIO2)、pH值、二氧化碳分压(PCO2)、核心温度和前负荷恒定。CMV时平均气道压(Paw)为4.8±0.7cmH2O,而HFO时为3.5±1.0cmH2O(p<0.05)。动脉血氧分压(PaO2)无差异。我们发现,在心脏输出量、MAP、MPAP、体循环血管阻力和肺血管阻力方面,两种通气模式之间没有统计学上的显著差异。比较CMV和HFO时,脑皮质、肾皮质、肾上腺、肝动脉、左心室心肌和骨骼肌的血流量没有差异。尽管在较低的Paw下能够实现等效的氧合和通气,但在存在右心室功能障碍的情况下,HFO在血流动力学方面并不优于CMV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验