Gallioli Andrea, De Lorenzis Elisa, Boeri Luca, Delor Maurizio, Zanetti Stefano Paolo, Longo Fabrizio, Trinchieri Alberto, Montanari Emanuele
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Urology, University of Milan, Via della Commenda 15, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Department of Urology, University of Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
BMC Urol. 2017 Nov 16;17(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0296-1.
Computed Tomography (CT) is considered the gold-standard for the pre-operative evaluation of urolithiasis. However, no Hounsfield (HU) variable capable of differentiating stone types has been clearly identified. The aim of this study is to assess the predictive value of HU parameters on CT for determining stone composition and outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Seventy seven consecutive cases of PCNL between 2011 and 2016 were divided into 4 groups: 40 (52%) calcium, 26 (34%) uric acid, 5 (6%) struvite and 6 (8%) cystine stones. All images were reviewed by a single urologist using abdomen/bone windows to evaluate: stone volume, core (HUC), periphery HU and their absolute difference. HU density (HUD) was defined as the ratio between mean HU and the stone's largest diameter. ROC curves assessed the predictive power of HU for determining stone composition/stone-free rate (SFR).
No differences were found based on the viewing window (abdomen vs bone). Struvite stones had values halfway between hyperdense (calcium) and low-density (cystine/uric acid) calculi for all parameters except HUD, which was the lowest. All HU variables for medium-high density stones were greater than low-density stones (p < 0.001). HUC differentiated the two groups (cut-off 825 HU; specificity 90.6%, sensitivity 88.9%). HUD distinguished calcium from struvite (mean ± SD 51 ± 16 and 28 ± 12 respectively; p = 0.02) with high sensitivity (82.5%) and specificity (80%) at a cut-off of 35 HU/mm. Multivariate analysis revealed HUD ≥ 38.5 HU/mm to be an independent predictor of SFR (OR = 3.1, p = 0.03). No relationship was found between HU values and complication rate.
HU parameters help predict stone composition to select patients for oral chemolysis. HUD is an independent predictor of residual fragments after PCNL and may be fundamental to categorize it, driving the imaging choice at follow-up.
计算机断层扫描(CT)被认为是尿路结石术前评估的金标准。然而,尚未明确鉴定出能够区分结石类型的亨氏(HU)变量。本研究的目的是评估CT上HU参数对经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中结石成分及手术结果的预测价值。
2011年至2016年间连续77例PCNL病例被分为4组:40例(52%)为钙结石,26例(34%)为尿酸结石,5例(6%)为磷酸镁铵结石,6例(8%)为胱氨酸结石。所有图像均由一名泌尿外科医生使用腹部/骨窗进行复查,以评估:结石体积、核心(HUC)、周边HU及其绝对差值。HU密度(HUD)定义为平均HU与结石最大直径之比。ROC曲线评估HU对确定结石成分/无石率(SFR)的预测能力。
基于观察窗(腹部与骨窗)未发现差异。除HUD最低外,磷酸镁铵结石在所有参数上的值均介于高密度(钙)结石和低密度(胱氨酸/尿酸)结石之间。中高密度结石的所有HU变量均大于低密度结石(p < 0.001)。HUC区分了两组(截断值825 HU;特异性90.6%,敏感性88.9%)。HUD区分钙结石和磷酸镁铵结石(均值±标准差分别为51±16和28±12;p = 0.02),截断值为35 HU/mm时,敏感性(82.5%)和特异性(80%)较高。多因素分析显示HUD≥38.5 HU/mm是SFR的独立预测因素(OR =
3.1,p = 0.03)。未发现HU值与并发症发生率之间存在关联。
HU参数有助于预测结石成分,以选择适合口服化学溶解治疗的患者。HUD是PCNL术后残余碎片的独立预测因素,可能是对其进行分类的关键因素,指导随访时的影像学选择。