Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
Glob Heart. 2018 Mar;13(1):27-34.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
Health-system barriers and facilitators associated with cardiovascular medication adherence have seldom been studied, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where uptake rates are poorest.
This study sought to explore the major obstacles and facilitators to the use of evidence-supported medications for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease using qualitative analysis in 2 diverse countries across multiple levels of their health care systems.
A qualitative descriptive study approach was implemented in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and Delhi, India. A purposeful sample (n = 69) of 23 patients, 10 physicians, 2 nurse practitioners, 5 Department of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy physicians, 11 pharmacists, 3 nurses, 4 hospital administrators, 1 social worker, 3 nongovernmental organization workers, 2 pharmaceutical company representatives, and 5 policy makers participated in interviews in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (n = 21), and Delhi, India (n = 48). All interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed followed by directed content analysis to summarize and categorize the interviews.
Themes that emerged across the stakeholder groups included: medication counseling; monitoring adherence; medication availability; medication affordability and drug coverage; time restrictions; and task shifting. The depth of verbal medication counseling provided varied substantially between countries, with prescribers in India unable to convey relevant information about drug treatments due to time constraint and high patient load. Canadian patients reported drug affordability as a common issue and very few patients were familiar with government subsidized drug programs. In India, patients purchased medications out-of-pocket from private, community pharmacies to avoid long commutes, lost wages, and unavailability of medications from hospitals formularies. Task shifting medication-refilling and titration to nonphysician health workers was accepted and supported by physicians in Canada but not in India, where many of the physicians considered a high level of clinical expertise a precondition to carry out these tasks skillfully.
Our findings reveal context-specific, health system factors that affect the patient's choice or ability to initiate and/or continue cardiovascular medication. Strategies to optimize cardiovascular drug use should be targeted and relevant to the health care system.
心血管药物治疗依从性相关的卫生系统障碍和促进因素很少得到研究,尤其是在药物使用率最低的低收入和中等收入国家。
本研究旨在使用定性分析方法,在两个不同国家的多个卫生系统层面上,探讨使用循证药物进行二级预防心血管疾病的主要障碍和促进因素。
在加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿和印度德里实施了定性描述性研究方法。采用目的抽样法,在汉密尔顿(加拿大)(n=21)和德里(印度)(n=48)共纳入23 名患者、10 名医生、2 名执业护士、5 名印度阿育吠陀、瑜伽和顺势疗法医生、11 名药剂师、3 名护士、4 名医院管理人员、1 名社会工作者、3 名非政府组织工作人员、2 名制药公司代表和 5 名政策制定者,参与访谈。所有访谈均进行数字化记录和转录,然后进行定向内容分析,以总结和分类访谈。
跨利益相关者群体出现的主题包括:药物咨询;监测依从性;药物供应;药物可负担性和药物覆盖范围;时间限制;以及任务转移。两国之间的口头药物咨询深度差异很大,印度的开处方者由于时间限制和患者人数众多,无法传达有关药物治疗的相关信息。加拿大患者报告药物可负担性是一个常见问题,很少有患者熟悉政府补贴药物计划。在印度,患者从私人社区药店自费购买药物,以避免长途通勤、旷工和医院处方药物的短缺。在加拿大,将药物续药和滴定任务转移给非医师卫生工作者是可以接受的,也得到了医生的支持,但在印度,许多医生认为熟练执行这些任务的前提是具备高水平的临床专业知识。
我们的研究结果揭示了影响患者选择或启动和/或继续心血管药物治疗的特定于具体情况的卫生系统因素。优化心血管药物使用的策略应该针对并与卫生保健系统相关。