Département d'Hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes (IPC), 13009, Marseille.
Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, CNRS UMR7258, 13009, Marseille.
Am J Hematol. 2018 Mar;93(3):330-338. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24973. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
Acute myeloid leukemias secondary (sAML) to myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have variable clinical courses and outcomes, but remain almost always fatal. Large cohorts of sAML to MPN are difficult to obtain and there is very little scientific literature or prospective trials for determining robust prognostic markers and efficient treatments. We analyzed event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of 73 patients with MPN who progressed to sAML, based on their epidemiological characteristics, the preexisting MPN, the different treatments received, the different prognostic groups and the responses achieved according to the ELN, and their mutational status determined by next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). For 24 patients, we were able to do a comparative NGS analysis at both MPN and sAML phase. After acute transformation EFS and OS were respectively of 2.9 months (range: 0-48.1) and 4.7 months (range: 0.1-58.8). No difference in EFS or OS regarding the previous MPN, the ELN2017 prognostic classification, the first-line therapy or the response was found. After univariate analysis, three genes, TP53, SRSF2 and TET2, impacted pejoratively sAML prognosis at sAML time. In multivariate analysis, TP53 (P = .0001), TET2 (P = .011) and SRSF2 (P = .018) remained independent prognostic factors. Time to sAML transformation was shorter in SRSF2-mutated patients (51.2 months, range: 14.7-98) than in SRSF2-unmutated patients (133.8 months, range: 12.6-411.2) (P < .001). Conventional clinical factors (age, karyotype, ELN2017 prognostic classification, treatments received, treatments response, Allo-SCT…) failed to predict the patients' outcome. Only the mutational status appeared relevant to predict patients' prognosis at sAML phase.
继发于骨髓增生性肿瘤(MPN)的急性髓系白血病(sAML)具有不同的临床病程和结局,但几乎总是致命的。获得大量继发于 MPN 的 sAML 队列非常困难,而且几乎没有科学文献或前瞻性试验来确定可靠的预后标志物和有效的治疗方法。我们根据患者的流行病学特征、先前的 MPN、接受的不同治疗、不同的预后分组以及根据 ELN 获得的反应,以及通过下一代 DNA 测序(NGS)确定的突变状态,分析了 73 例进展为 sAML 的 MPN 患者的无事件生存(EFS)和总生存(OS)。对于 24 例患者,我们能够在 MPN 和 sAML 阶段进行比较 NGS 分析。急性转化后 EFS 和 OS 分别为 2.9 个月(范围:0-48.1)和 4.7 个月(范围:0.1-58.8)。先前的 MPN、ELN2017 预后分类、一线治疗或反应对 EFS 或 OS 没有影响。单因素分析后,TP53、SRSF2 和 TET2 三个基因在 sAML 时间点对 sAML 预后产生不利影响。多因素分析显示,TP53(P = .0001)、TET2(P = .011)和 SRSF2(P = .018)仍然是独立的预后因素。SRSF2 突变患者 sAML 转化时间更短(51.2 个月,范围:14.7-98),而非 SRSF2 未突变患者 sAML 转化时间更长(133.8 个月,范围:12.6-411.2)(P < .001)。传统的临床因素(年龄、核型、ELN2017 预后分类、接受的治疗、治疗反应、allo-SCT…)无法预测患者的结局。只有突变状态似乎与 sAML 阶段患者的预后相关。