Cobos Pilar, Sánchez María, Pérez Nieves, Vila Jaime
a Malaga University, Spain.
b Granada University, Spain.
Cogn Emot. 2004 Feb 1;18(2):281-287. doi: 10.1080/02699930244000471.
Responses to a structured interview by 19 patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) (7 women and 12 men) concerning their past (pre-injury) and present emotions were analysed and compared with responses by 19 SCI-free controls matched for sex, age, and education. In addition, subjects assessed the valence and arousal of 10 pleasant, 10 neutral, and 10 unpleasant pictures selected from the International Affective Picture System. The results indicate that there is no decrease in emotional experience among individuals with SCI compared with those without. For all the emotional scales (joy, love, sentimentalism, positive emotions as a whole, fear, anger, sadness, and negative emotions as a whole) the SCI group always showed either no change or an increase; this increase was significantly higher in SCI than in control subjects for sadness. No differences were observed between the two groups in the subjective assessment of the pictures. The implications of the results for the James versus Cannon controversy on the theory of emotions are discussed.
分析了19名脊髓损伤(SCI)患者(7名女性和12名男性)针对其过去(受伤前)和当前情绪的结构化访谈回复,并与19名在性别、年龄和教育程度上匹配的无脊髓损伤对照者的回复进行了比较。此外,受试者对从国际情感图片系统中选出的10张愉悦、10张中性和10张不愉快图片的效价和唤醒度进行了评估。结果表明,与无脊髓损伤者相比,脊髓损伤个体的情感体验没有减少。在所有情感量表(喜悦、爱、多愁善感、整体积极情绪、恐惧、愤怒、悲伤以及整体消极情绪)上,脊髓损伤组要么没有变化,要么有所增加;悲伤方面,脊髓损伤组的增加显著高于对照组。两组在图片的主观评估上未观察到差异。讨论了这些结果对詹姆斯与坎农关于情绪理论争议的影响。