Suppr超能文献

M4艾哈迈德青光眼引流植入物的临床经验

Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant.

作者信息

Sluch Ilya, Gudgel Brett, Dvorak Justin, Anne Ahluwalia Mary, Ding Kai, Vold Steve, Sarkisian Steven

机构信息

Ophthalmologist, Department of Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

Biostatistician, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

出版信息

J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2017 Sep-Dec;11(3):92-96. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1231. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the M4 (porous polyethylene plate) Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) drainage implant in a multicenter retrospective study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of medical records of patients who had undergone the M4 Ahmed valve was performed from January 2013 to April 2015. The primary outcome measure was surgical failure defined as: Less than a 20% reduction in baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) to last follow-up visit, final IOP less than 5 mm Hg or greater than 18 mm Hg, reoperation for glaucoma, or loss of light perception vision. All eyes not meeting the above criteria were defined as success.

RESULTS

A total of 291 eyes met all study inclusion criteria. The average follow-up in the study was 6 months (±7.6 months) with 112 patients achieving 12-month follow-up (38.5%). 208 eyes (71.5%) met the study success criteria at final follow-up. No statistically significant spikes in postoperative IOP at 1 and 4 months were detected. The average preoperative IOP was 26.0 on an average of 2.8 medications. At 6 months, the average IOP dropped to 16.7 on 0.9 medications and stayed relatively stable at 15.8 on 1.2 medications at 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The M4 valve appears to have less of a hypertensive phase compared with the other Ahmed class valves with a similar safety profile. While 71.5% success rate was achieved at final follow-up, the failure rate steadily increased over time.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

While the M4 production has been discontinued, the porous design of the M4 may avoid a pressure spike in the Ahmed valve class and warrants future investigation for valve design. Sluch I, Gudgel B, Dvorak J, Ahluwalia MA, Ding K, Vold S, Sarkisian S. Clinical Experience with the M4 Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2017;11(3):92-96.

摘要

目的

在一项多中心回顾性研究中评估M4(多孔聚乙烯板)艾哈迈德青光眼引流阀(AGV)植入物的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

对2013年1月至2015年4月期间接受M4艾哈迈德瓣膜植入手术的患者病历进行回顾性图表审查。主要结局指标定义为手术失败:从基线眼压(IOP)到最后一次随访时降低幅度小于20%,最终眼压小于5 mmHg或大于18 mmHg,因青光眼再次手术,或光感丧失。所有未达到上述标准的眼睛定义为成功。

结果

共有291只眼睛符合所有研究纳入标准。研究中的平均随访时间为6个月(±7.6个月),112例患者完成了12个月的随访(38.5%)。208只眼睛(71.5%)在最后一次随访时达到了研究成功标准。未检测到术后1个月和4个月眼压有统计学意义的峰值。术前平均眼压为26.0,平均使用2.8种药物。在6个月时,平均眼压降至16.7,使用0.9种药物,在12个月随访时,使用1.2种药物时相对稳定在15.8。

结论

与其他具有相似安全性的艾哈迈德类瓣膜相比,M4瓣膜的高血压期似乎较短。虽然最后一次随访时成功率达到71.5%,但失败率随时间稳步增加。

临床意义

虽然M4已停产,但其多孔设计可能避免艾哈迈德瓣膜类中的压力峰值,值得未来对瓣膜设计进行研究。Sluch I, Gudgel B, Dvorak J, Ahluwalia MA, Ding K, Vold S, Sarkisian S. M4艾哈迈德青光眼引流植入物的临床经验。《当代青光眼实践杂志》2017;11(3):92 - 96。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a1b/5684239/9271b46dbcab/jocgp-11-092-i001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验