Pan Tao, Mu Lu-Wen, Wu Chun, Wu Xi-Qun, Xie Qian-Kun, Li Xi-Shan, Lyu Ning, Li Shao-Long, Deng Hai-Jing, Jiang Zai-Bo, Lin Ai-Hua, Zhao Ming
Department of Vascular Interventional Radiology, the Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Division of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
J Cancer. 2017 Sep 29;8(17):3506-3513. doi: 10.7150/jca.19964. eCollection 2017.
We compared the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with that of surgical resection (SR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the up-to-seven criteria. From January 2004 to December 2014, 420 multicenter consecutive patients with HCC who conformed to the up-to-seven criteria and initially received either TACE plus CT-guided RFA (TACE-RFA) or SR were enrolled. A matched cohort composed of 206 patients was selected after adjustment with propensity score matching. The overall survival (OS) of each patient was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The median OS and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 56.0 months, 96.1%, 76.7% and 41.3% in the TACE-RFA group and 58.0 months, 96.1%, 86.4% and 46.2% in the SR group, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups ( = 0.138). For patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria, TACE-RFA provided a longer median OS than SR (52.0 vs 45.0 months, = 0.023). Treatment by TACE-RFA conferred an OS rate comparable with that of SR in patients within the up-to-seven criteria. For patients with HCC between the Milan and the up-to-seven criteria, TACE-RFA might be superior to SR for survival prolongation.
我们比较了经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合CT引导下射频消融术(RFA)与手术切除(SR)对符合米兰标准及扩展标准的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的疗效。2004年1月至2014年12月,420例符合米兰标准及扩展标准且最初接受TACE联合CT引导下RFA(TACE-RFA)或SR的多中心连续HCC患者入组。经倾向得分匹配调整后,选取了由206例患者组成的匹配队列。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算每位患者的总生存期(OS),并通过对数秩检验进行比较。TACE-RFA组患者的中位OS及1年、3年和5年生存率分别为56.0个月、96.1%、76.7%和41.3%,SR组分别为58.0个月、96.1%、86.4%和46.2%。两组间OS无显著差异(P = 0.138)。对于超出米兰标准的HCC患者,TACE-RFA的中位OS长于SR(52.0个月对45.0个月,P = 0.023)。在符合扩展标准的患者中,TACE-RFA治疗的OS率与SR相当。对于米兰标准至扩展标准之间的HCC患者,TACE-RFA在延长生存期方面可能优于SR。