J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(5):417-424. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39277.
To investigate the effect of a universal adhesive on the bond strength of composite cements to a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network.
Shear bond strength to a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (Vita Enamic) and to its polymer and ceramic components was assessed on polished surfaces using either a conventional dual-curing resin (RelyX Ultimate) or self-adhesive composite cement (RelyX Unicem 2 Automix). Substrate surfaces were either not pretreated or a silane coupling agent (Vitasil), a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive), or both were applied. Further, the shear bond strength to polymer-infiltrated ceramic network was evaluated after etching with 5% hydrofluoric acid (Vita Ceramics Etch) of 0, 15, 30, 60 or 120 s without or with application of silane, universal adhesive, or both (n = 10). Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05) followed by post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction.
No bond (0 MPa) was formed to the polished polymer-infiltrated ceramic network or to its components for either cement. Application of silane resulted in low mean bond strengths (4 to 5 MPa) to the ceramic. The universal adhesive bonded mainly to the polymer part of the polymer-infiltrated ceramic network. The best bonding performance for both cements was achieved when silane and universal adhesive were applied on the polymer-infiltrated ceramic network. Etching for 30 s or 60 s resulted in the highest mean shear bond strengths for all pretreatment groups (p < 0.05).
The best bonding performance of the self-adhesive dual-curing composite cement RelyX Unicem 2 Automix was found on the HF-etched polymer-infiltrated ceramic network. The conventional dual-curing composite cement RelyX Ultimate with Scotchbond Universal Adhesive may bond chemically to the polymer part of the polymer-infiltrated ceramic network. To achieve the highest bond strengths for both cements, the polymer-infiltrated ceramic network should be etched for 30 to 60 s, followed by the application of silane and universal adhesive.
研究通用粘结剂对复合水泥与聚合物渗透陶瓷网络粘结强度的影响。
在经过抛光的表面上,使用传统双固化树脂(RelyX Ultimate)或自粘结复合水泥(RelyX Unicem 2 Automix)评估对聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(Vita Enamic)及其聚合物和陶瓷成分的剪切粘结强度。基底表面要么未经预处理,要么应用硅烷偶联剂(Vitasil)、通用粘结剂(Scotchbond Universal Adhesive)或两者都应用。此外,在不使用或使用硅烷、通用粘结剂或两者的情况下,评估了经过 0、15、30、60 或 120 s 的 5%氢氟酸(Vita Ceramics Etch)蚀刻后对聚合物渗透陶瓷网络的剪切粘结强度(n = 10)。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验(p < 0.05)进行统计分析,然后用 Bonferroni 校正进行事后比较。
对于任何水泥,都没有在抛光的聚合物渗透陶瓷网络或其成分上形成粘结(0 MPa)。硅烷的应用导致对陶瓷的平均粘结强度低(4 至 5 MPa)。通用粘结剂主要粘结在聚合物渗透陶瓷网络的聚合物部分。当硅烷和通用粘结剂应用于聚合物渗透陶瓷网络时,两种水泥都获得了最佳的粘结性能。对于所有预处理组,蚀刻 30 s 或 60 s 导致最高的平均剪切粘结强度(p < 0.05)。
发现自粘结双固化复合水泥 RelyX Unicem 2 Automix 的最佳粘结性能是在 HF 蚀刻的聚合物渗透陶瓷网络上。传统的双固化复合水泥 RelyX Ultimate 与 Scotchbond Universal Adhesive 可能会与聚合物渗透陶瓷网络的聚合物部分发生化学粘结。为了获得两种水泥的最高粘结强度,聚合物渗透陶瓷网络应蚀刻 30 至 60 s,然后应用硅烷和通用粘结剂。