Institute of Urban Environment & Human Resources, Department of Economic & Regional Development, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 29 Aristotelous Street, GR-17671, Kallithea, Athens, Greece; Center for Systems Integration & Sustainability, Michigan State University, Manly Miles Building, 1405 South Harrison Road, East Lansing, MI 48823-5243, USA.
Institute of Urban Environment & Human Resources, Department of Economic & Regional Development, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, 29 Aristotelous Street, GR-17671, Kallithea, Athens, Greece; Public Power Corporation S.A. (PPC SA), Support Operations Division, Department of Material and Purchasing, 55 Stournari Street, GR-10432 Athens, Greece.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 1;619-620:338-351. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.061. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
Interest in investigating the complex link between resources and developments has revived recently following studies which support striking "dematerialized" growth over the last hundred years or so. This so-called decoupling effect is defined as the declining quantity of resources required for producing one unit of GDP. Decoupling studies adopt aggregate GDP as the measure of the outcome of the economy. However, this outcome is contributed by the total population which differs over time and between countries. A valid comparison should use a comparable, standardized indicator that adjusts for population size. GDP per capita, the income index, defines in monetary terms the ultimate outcome of the economy and is adopted by international organizations as the standard index for comparing economies. The income index approximates, in monetary terms, the welfare produced by the economic system and enjoyed by individuals. Recently developed alternative indexes of welfare lack broad data coverage and have limited empirical application as yet. For this reason and for ensuring direct comparison with the standard decoupling estimates, our study remains within the monetary context. The present paper re-evaluates the resources-economy link from the perspective of "the resources required for the production of one unit of GDP per capita (Income)" and hence evaluates the efficiency of turning resources into the actual outcome of the economic system. Our estimates suggest that the dependence of global economic growth on natural resources has increased by over 60% in the last 110years (1900-2009), contrasting with the prevailing decoupling estimates which suggest a reduction by 63%. We find that the actual decoupling, which began in the mid-1970s in post-industrial economies, is counterbalanced by the intensified resource intensity of several developing economies. Accordingly, in the pursuit of sustainability, the dematerialization target needs to be more clearly incorporated into environmental policies and pervade contemporary economic thinking.
近年来,随着研究支持过去一百年来左右明显的“去物质化”增长,人们对研究资源与发展之间复杂关系的兴趣重新燃起。这种所谓的脱钩效应被定义为生产一单位国内生产总值所需资源数量的下降。脱钩研究采用总国内生产总值作为经济成果的衡量标准。然而,这种结果是由总人口贡献的,总人口在时间上和国家之间有所不同。有效的比较应该使用可比较的标准化指标,该指标可根据人口规模进行调整。人均国内生产总值,即收入指数,以货币形式定义了经济的最终成果,并被国际组织作为比较经济的标准指数采用。收入指数以货币形式近似表示经济体系所产生的福利,并为个人所享有。最近开发的福利替代指数缺乏广泛的数据覆盖范围,并且到目前为止,其经验应用有限。出于这个原因,并为确保与标准脱钩估计值的直接比较,我们的研究仍然在货币背景下进行。本文从“人均国内生产总值(收入)所需的资源”的角度重新评估资源与经济的关系,从而评估将资源转化为经济体系实际成果的效率。我们的估计表明,在过去的 110 年(1900-2009 年)中,全球经济增长对自然资源的依赖增加了 60%以上,而普遍的脱钩估计表明减少了 63%。我们发现,自 20 世纪 70 年代中期以来,在后工业化经济体中开始出现实际脱钩,这被几个发展中经济体资源密集度的加强所抵消。因此,在追求可持续性的过程中,需要更明确地将去物质化目标纳入环境政策,并渗透到当代经济思维中。