• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择中国东北地区不同土地利用方式下碱性土壤的最小数据集和定量土壤质量指数。

Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China.

机构信息

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.

Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130102, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar;616-617:564-571. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.301. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.301
PMID:29154147
Abstract

Understanding the influences of land use conversions on soil quality (SQ) and function are essential to adopt proper agricultural management practices for a specific region. The primary objective of this study was to develop soil quality indices (SQIs) to assess the short-term influences of different land uses on SQ in semiarid alkaline grassland in northeastern China. Land use treatments were corn cropland (Corn), alfalfa perennial forage (Alfalfa), monoculture Lyemus chinensis grassland (MG) and successional regrowth grassland (SRG), which were applied for five years. Twenty-two soil indicators were determined at 0-20cm depth as the potential SQ indicators. Of these, thirteen indicators exhibited treatment differences and were identified as the total data set (TDS) for subsequent analysis. Principal component analysis was used with the TDS to select the minimum data set (MDS), and four SQIs were calculated using linear/non-linear scoring functions and additive/weighted additive methods. Invertase, N:P ratio, water-extractable organic carbon and labile carbon were identified as the MDS. The four SQIs performed well, with significant positive correlations (P<0.001, n=16) among them. However, the SQI calculated using the non-linear weighted additive integration (SQI-NLWA) had the best discrimination under different land-use treatments due to the higher F values and larger coefficient of variance as compared to the other SQIs. The SQI value under the MG treatment was the highest, followed by that under the SRG and Alfalfa treatments, and all of these were significantly higher than that of Corn treatment. These results indicated that conversion of cropland to perennial forage or grassland can significantly improve the SQ in the Songnen grassland. In addition, SQI-NLWA can provide a better practical, quantitative tool for assessing SQ and is recommended for soil quality evaluation under different land uses in semiarid agroecosystems.

摘要

了解土地利用变化对土壤质量(SQ)和功能的影响对于采用特定地区的适当农业管理实践至关重要。本研究的主要目的是开发土壤质量指数(SQI),以评估不同土地利用对中国东北半干旱碱性草原短期土壤质量的影响。土地利用处理为玉米耕地(玉米)、多年生苜蓿牧草(苜蓿)、单种芨芨草草地(MG)和演替再生草地(SRG),应用于五年。在 0-20cm 深度测定了 22 个土壤指标作为潜在土壤质量指标。其中,13 个指标表现出处理差异,被确定为后续分析的总数据集(TDS)。采用主成分分析法对 TDS 进行分析,选择最小数据集(MDS),并采用线性/非线性评分函数和加性/加权加性方法计算四个 SQI。转化酶、N:P 比、水可提取有机碳和活性碳被确定为 MDS。四个 SQI 表现良好,它们之间存在显著的正相关(P<0.001,n=16)。然而,与其他 SQI 相比,基于非线性加权加性综合(SQI-NLWA)的 SQI 在不同土地利用处理下具有更好的区分能力,因为它具有更高的 F 值和更大的变异系数。MG 处理下的 SQI 值最高,其次是 SRG 和苜蓿处理下的 SQI 值,均显著高于玉米处理下的 SQI 值。这些结果表明,将耕地转化为多年生牧草或草地可以显著提高松嫩草原的土壤质量。此外,SQI-NLWA 可以为评估土壤质量提供更好的实用定量工具,建议在半干旱农业生态系统中不同土地利用下进行土壤质量评价。

相似文献

1
Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China.选择中国东北地区不同土地利用方式下碱性土壤的最小数据集和定量土壤质量指数。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar;616-617:564-571. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.301. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
2
Responses of soil specific enzyme activities to short-term land use conversions in a salt-affected region, northeastern China.盐渍地区短期土地利用方式转变对土壤特异性酶活性的响应
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 15;687:939-945. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.171. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
3
Soil quality assessment of coastal salt-affected acid soils of India.印度沿海盐渍酸化土壤的质量评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(21):26221-26238. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09010-w. Epub 2020 May 2.
4
[Comprehensive evaluation of soil quality of different land use types on the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China].[中国青藏高原东北缘不同土地利用类型土壤质量综合评价]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Dec;33(12):3279-3286. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202212.016.
5
A framework for selecting and assessing soil quality indicators for sustainable soil management in waste dumps.用于垃圾填埋场可持续土壤管理的土壤质量指标选择与评估框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 11;14(1):8491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58930-x.
6
Evaluating quality of soils formed on basement complex rocks in Kaduna State, northern Guinea savanna of Nigeria.评估尼日利亚几内亚草原北部卡杜纳州基岩上发育的土壤的质量。
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Jun 5;193(7):383. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09157-0.
7
Restoration of soil quality of degraded grassland can be accelerated by reseeding in an arid area of Northwest China.在中国西北干旱地区,通过重新播种可以加速退化草地土壤质量的恢复。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 13;14:1101295. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1101295. eCollection 2023.
8
Soil Quality Indexing Strategies for Evaluating Sugarcane Expansion in Brazil.巴西甘蔗种植扩张评估的土壤质量指标策略
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 3;11(3):e0150860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150860. eCollection 2016.
9
Spatiotemporal variations in the soil quality of agricultural land and its drivers in China from 1980 to 2018.1980年至2018年中国农用地土壤质量的时空变化及其驱动因素
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Sep 20;892:164649. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164649. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
10
Soil quality index (SQI) for evaluating the sustainability status of Kakia-Esamburmbur catchment under three different land use types in Narok County, Kenya.用于评估肯尼亚纳罗克县卡卡亚-埃桑布尔姆布尔集水区三种不同土地利用类型下可持续性状况的土壤质量指数(SQI)。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 5;10(5):e25611. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25611. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Microbial determinants of soil quality in mixed larch and birch forests: network structure and keystone taxa abundances.落叶松和白桦混交林土壤质量的微生物决定因素:网络结构和关键分类群丰度
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jul 15;16:1491038. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1491038. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of Land use on soil quality: Insights from the forest-savannah transition zone of Ghana.土地利用对土壤质量的影响:来自加纳森林 - 稀树草原过渡带的见解
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 13;11(1):e41183. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41183. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
3
Impact of Different Land-Use Types on Soil Microbial Carbon Metabolism Function in Arid Region of Alpine Grassland.
不同土地利用类型对高寒草原干旱区土壤微生物碳代谢功能的影响
Plants (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;13(24):3531. doi: 10.3390/plants13243531.
4
Coupling Relationship Between Soil Properties and Plant Diversity Under Different Ecological Restoration Patterns in the Abandoned Coal Mine Area of Southern China.中国南方废弃矿区不同生态修复模式下土壤性质与植物多样性的耦合关系
Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 17;14(12):e70686. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70686. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Conversion of farmland to forest or grassland improves soil carbon, nitrogen, and ecosystem multi-functionality in a subtropical karst region of southwest China.在中国西南部亚热带喀斯特地区,退耕还林还草可改善土壤碳、氮及生态系统多功能性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(1):17745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68883-w.
6
A framework for selecting and assessing soil quality indicators for sustainable soil management in waste dumps.用于垃圾填埋场可持续土壤管理的土壤质量指标选择与评估框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 11;14(1):8491. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58930-x.
7
Evaluating the Soil Quality Index Using Three Methods to Assess Soil Fertility.使用三种方法评估土壤肥力来评价土壤质量指数
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 29;24(3):864. doi: 10.3390/s24030864.
8
Assessment of soil quality in an arid and barren mountainous of Shandong province, China.中国山东省干旱贫瘠山区土壤质量评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 15;13(1):19966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46136-6.
9
Soil Microbial Community, Soil Quality, and Productivity along a Chronosequence of Forests.沿森林时间序列的土壤微生物群落、土壤质量与生产力
Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;12(16):2913. doi: 10.3390/plants12162913.
10
Restoration of soil quality of degraded grassland can be accelerated by reseeding in an arid area of Northwest China.在中国西北干旱地区,通过重新播种可以加速退化草地土壤质量的恢复。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jun 13;14:1101295. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1101295. eCollection 2023.